The War on Drugs
Posted: Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:13 pm
First off, let me state that this is about raising awareness of the consequences of drug prohibition. I'm not a drug user and I'm in no way conceding to the sale and distribution of illegal drugs.
I honestly believe that everything we are being told about the drugs and the drug users is being grossly distorted, and presented without useful context. The so called "War on Drugs", is primarily a tactic to keep street prices high and profits astronomical, regardless of the huge social and personal damage done.
This war was announced by Richard Nixon in 1971 and in 2003, it was announced that the U.S. federal government spent over $19 billion dollars on the War on Drugs. The budget has since been increased by over a billion dollars. There are currently over 1.5 million people in prisons across the United States, 59.6% of them are in there for drug offenses. While prisons are being populated with drug offenders, asset forfeiture laws have enabled police to confiscate millions of dollars in property from citizens merely suspected of involvement in drug trafficking.
Yet heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine and other illicit drugs are cheaper, purer and easier to get than ever before.
What's wrong with this picture and what is this war really about?
Many of the problems the drug war purports to resolve are in fact caused by the "Drug War" itself. So-called "drug-related" crime is a direct result of drug prohibition's distortion of immutable laws of supply and demand.
Let me explain.
The illicit drug industry is an annual market of $400 billion. The war on drugs is fought by trying to apprehend producers and distributors of drugs, and then to punish them rather severely if convicted. The expected punishment raises the price that suppliers of drugs need to receive in order for them to be willing to take the considerable risks involved in the drug trade. The harder the war is fought, the greater the expected punishment, the higher is the street price of drugs. This is the law of supply and demand.
The real problem with drugs in the modern world is that they are illegal. A legal drug is not necessarily safe or non-addictive. Drugs that are both legal and freely available (such as alcohol and nicotine) are among the most often abused. Even prescription drugs at prescribed doses can be addictive, can have dangerous side effects and can cause drug interactions. Other drugs (such as sedatives and tranquilizers) are available by prescription and are considered safe for medical purposes, but they are highly addictive, even at prescribed dosages.
The death of Anna Nicole Smith is a perfect example. Tests revealed that she had nine legal drugs in her blood.
There are now more Americans in prison than there are on active duty in the military. We spend about $40,000 per year per prisoner. How many people are dying everyday because they don't have access to medical care and proper nutrition? Should they start selling drugs and hope to get incarcerated?
Nowadays, it seems like everyone are either on some kind of anti-depressants or taking sleeping pills. We drown our sorrows in alcohol and control our pains with prescriptions.
I'm not saying that there is a simple solution to this problem but if we've been fighting this war a certain way since the 70's then maybe we should start looking for another avenue. It is my opinion that legalization could have a greater effect in reducing drug use than a "war on drug" without all the large and disturbing system costs.
The tax revenue from drugs would accrue to state and federal authorities, rather than being dissipated into the real cost involving police, imprisonment, dangerous qualities, and the like. Instead of drug cartels, there would be legal companies involved in production and distribution of drugs of reliable quality, as happened after the prohibition of alcohol ended.
What do you think?
I honestly believe that everything we are being told about the drugs and the drug users is being grossly distorted, and presented without useful context. The so called "War on Drugs", is primarily a tactic to keep street prices high and profits astronomical, regardless of the huge social and personal damage done.
This war was announced by Richard Nixon in 1971 and in 2003, it was announced that the U.S. federal government spent over $19 billion dollars on the War on Drugs. The budget has since been increased by over a billion dollars. There are currently over 1.5 million people in prisons across the United States, 59.6% of them are in there for drug offenses. While prisons are being populated with drug offenders, asset forfeiture laws have enabled police to confiscate millions of dollars in property from citizens merely suspected of involvement in drug trafficking.
Yet heroin, cocaine, methamphetamine and other illicit drugs are cheaper, purer and easier to get than ever before.
What's wrong with this picture and what is this war really about?
Many of the problems the drug war purports to resolve are in fact caused by the "Drug War" itself. So-called "drug-related" crime is a direct result of drug prohibition's distortion of immutable laws of supply and demand.
Let me explain.
The illicit drug industry is an annual market of $400 billion. The war on drugs is fought by trying to apprehend producers and distributors of drugs, and then to punish them rather severely if convicted. The expected punishment raises the price that suppliers of drugs need to receive in order for them to be willing to take the considerable risks involved in the drug trade. The harder the war is fought, the greater the expected punishment, the higher is the street price of drugs. This is the law of supply and demand.
The real problem with drugs in the modern world is that they are illegal. A legal drug is not necessarily safe or non-addictive. Drugs that are both legal and freely available (such as alcohol and nicotine) are among the most often abused. Even prescription drugs at prescribed doses can be addictive, can have dangerous side effects and can cause drug interactions. Other drugs (such as sedatives and tranquilizers) are available by prescription and are considered safe for medical purposes, but they are highly addictive, even at prescribed dosages.
The death of Anna Nicole Smith is a perfect example. Tests revealed that she had nine legal drugs in her blood.
There are now more Americans in prison than there are on active duty in the military. We spend about $40,000 per year per prisoner. How many people are dying everyday because they don't have access to medical care and proper nutrition? Should they start selling drugs and hope to get incarcerated?
Nowadays, it seems like everyone are either on some kind of anti-depressants or taking sleeping pills. We drown our sorrows in alcohol and control our pains with prescriptions.
I'm not saying that there is a simple solution to this problem but if we've been fighting this war a certain way since the 70's then maybe we should start looking for another avenue. It is my opinion that legalization could have a greater effect in reducing drug use than a "war on drug" without all the large and disturbing system costs.
The tax revenue from drugs would accrue to state and federal authorities, rather than being dissipated into the real cost involving police, imprisonment, dangerous qualities, and the like. Instead of drug cartels, there would be legal companies involved in production and distribution of drugs of reliable quality, as happened after the prohibition of alcohol ended.
What do you think?