Page 1 of 1

Disney Pulls Out of 'Peter Pan' Movie in Hospital Dispute

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 3:30 am
by 2099net
From IMDB

Disney was being depicted as a Scrooge after it dropped out of a new $140-million film version of Peter Pan over a merchandising dispute involving the distribution of profits to the Great Ormond Street Hospital in London. In his will, Peter Pan author J.M. Barrie had transferred the copyright to the hospital, which subsequently made a deal with Disney, in which it receives a regular annual payment for rights to the story. Disney continues to dispute the hospital's claim to a percentage of profits from Peter Pan merchandise that Disney produces. A Disney spokeswoman said, "We did not want to be in a situation where we were paying twice." But the London Daily Telegraph quoted an unnamed producer connected with the film as saying, "The bottom line is that [Disney] wanted a share of the merchandising but did not want to pay for it."

Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2003 5:31 am
by 2099net
There's a more detailed account here (including Disney copyright police, policing a copyright they don't own!) :(

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/11/ ... 16621.html

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 12:20 am
by Grunches
very interesting thanks for sharing.

Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2003 4:31 pm
by Prince Adam
I'm sorry, but I think Peter Pan is just one of those things that should never be live-action-NeverLand is to magical and wonderful to be real, so it shouldn't be.
NeverLand should be brought to life only by animation: nothing else can capture the magic.

Plus, I recently saw some stills from that new movie, and they didn't look all that great :roll:

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 8:39 pm
by BasilOfBakerStreet427
Wow.That was actually old news from last year.Universal eventually went on to make it with Revolution Studios.

Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2003 11:29 pm
by XxSuRgEoxX
Prince Adam wrote:I'm sorry, but I think Peter Pan is just one of those things that should never be live-action-NeverLand is to magical and wonderful to be real, so it shouldn't be.
NeverLand should be brought to life only by animation: nothing else can capture the magic.

Plus, I recently saw some stills from that new movie, and they didn't look all that great :roll:
Well it was a play to begin with so there wouldn't be any Disney animated version if it wasn't for the live action play.

Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2003 5:18 am
by 2099net
Sort of getting off topic, but here's some new JM Barrie Peter Pan news:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/devon/3308591.stm