Page 1 of 1
Disney Gonna Get Tight-Lipped?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 5:39 am
by Jules
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 6:48 am
by KinOO
It's just the Jim Hill's way to tell that his source has left Disney

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 7:12 am
by PixarFan2006
That sounds like a bad idea. How are we supposed to know what will be coming out in the near future?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:06 am
by blackcauldron85
Well, even tight-lipped Pixar has let us know about "WALL-E", so we'll get some news, even if this Cone of Silence is true. I'v been an avid JHM reader for a long time, and I highly doubt that Jim only gets information from one WDFA insider.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:11 am
by Jules
blackcauldron85 wrote:Well, even tight-lipped Pixar has let us know about "WALL-E", so we'll get some news, even if this Cone of Silence is true. I'v been an avid JHM reader for a long time, and I highly doubt that Jim only gets information from one WDFA insider.
Well, I expect news on Wall-E leaked out through WDFA and not pixar.

lol... on the article, there's my post just a little bit below yours. You've been on JHM for ages ... then you joined UD. I remember your old JHM avatar (pre UD years) used to be of Taran, Eilonwy and Gurgi in a group hug.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:17 am
by blackcauldron85
Julian Carter wrote:blackcauldron85 wrote:Well, even tight-lipped Pixar has let us know about "WALL-E", so we'll get some news, even if this Cone of Silence is true. I'v been an avid JHM reader for a long time, and I highly doubt that Jim only gets information from one WDFA insider.
Well, I expect news on Wall-E leaked out through WDFA and not pixar.

lol... on the article, there's my post just a little bit below yours. You've been on JHM for ages ... then you joined UD. I remember your old JHM avatar (pre UD years) used to be of Taran, Eilonwy and Gurgi in a group hug.

Awww, you noticed! I LOVED that avatar, but, when I joined UD, I saw that Gurgi30 had the SAME avatar, so I changed it. I hope he appreciates it!

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 8:42 am
by akhenaten
im restless. there's no point of having the internet now.i need my daily dosage of rapunzels and frog princesses and enchanted and god knows whats coming out.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:03 am
by Jules
akhenaten wrote:im restless. there's no point of having the internet now.i need my daily dosage of rapunzels and frog princesses and enchanted and god knows whats coming out.
Precisely! How are we supposed to survive without our regular Disney-leaked-news-on-WDFA-projects dose?
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:39 am
by Wonderlicious
I've always found Disney to be somewhat tight lipped anyway (well, they seemed like that up until recently with
Enchanted) . Hmm...
Anyway, I wouldn't mind if things like titles to projects, projected release dates and pieces of concept art surfaced. So long as we don't get into the kind of scenario like discovering that the new Disney animated classic
Mickey's Introduction to French Grammar and Usage is (or more like was) being made six weeks prior to its release, I'm okay.
And equally, too much information is annoying. I accidently read (on Jim Hill, as well) the ending to
Meet the Robinsons...

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 9:41 am
by Mr. Toad
Good for them. Way too much information was coming from the wrong sources. It is especially damaging when information is leaked selectively to people like Jim Hill with an axe to grind. That way only a negative spin gets put on things as the writer is coming from a position of extreme bias.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:07 am
by akhenaten
well at least its good. we're getting too pampered.now itll be just like the old days...when disney was having its 90s renaissance! this could be something worth waiting for. i guess when we have too much input on story changes and all the politics behind a certain production.thats what devalues it and disappoint us if things dont reach our certain expectations. this way we'd just sit back and wait..while sneaking on a few slipped shots on the web.

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 10:25 am
by PatrickvD
KinOO wrote:It's just the Jim Hill's way to tell that his source has left Disney

LMAO
that was classic. Yeah it sounds like Jim writing an entire article around his source telling him he's out of the loop as of today.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 11:10 am
by Gurgi30
blackcauldron85 wrote:
Awww, you noticed! I LOVED that avatar, but, when I joined UD, I saw that Gurgi30 had the SAME avatar, so I changed it. I hope he appreciates it!

You mean this great thing?
I was hoping to find one of just Gurgi but this one was great. I do appreciate it and I love your avatar as well. It's easy to spot you since you have it both here and over at JMH.
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2007 3:57 pm
by blackcauldron85
Thanks, Gurgi! I was kind of kidding about my post, not thinking you'd read it! But, it is a great avatar...I love that scene! And, thanks for the complements on mine!