Page 1 of 2

James Cameron: 3-D Will Save Cinema; May Re-release Titanic

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 7:14 pm
by AwallaceUNC
Two articles about James Cameron out today. In the first, he says 3-D is the way to go to bring people back to the theaters:
World News


The Times June 30, 2006

3D tipped for star role, if it takes off
By Dalya Alberge
Director of Titanic says that cinema should wake up to possibilities

Click to see graphic

ONE of Hollywood’s leading directors called yesterday on studios, film-makers and distributors to wake up to the role that 3-D films can play in winning back audiences.

James Cameron, who was showered with Oscars for Titanic and who is directing a science-fiction 3-D film for 20th Century Fox, said that the technology enables cinemas to offer something that home entertainment cannot.

“I want to inspire people to come back to cinemas with an experience they can only have there,” he said. “Theatre owners, exhibitors and distributors should work to bring a sense of showmanship back to the cinema experience. Cinemagoing won’t go away, but it can get eroded. This is a wake-up call. Are we just going to lie down and let change roll over us, or do something about it?”

The latest 3-D technology boasts an unsurpassed clarity, making audiences feel that they are in the picture. Two reels of film go through the projector and fool the brain into merging them and seeing them in 3-D.

Although audiences still have to wear special glasses, advances mean that the eye strain and headaches associated with the green-and-red ones of past decades have been eliminated.

Cameron was speaking to The Times yesterday as Superman Returns, directed by Bryan Singer, has become the first live-action picture to have segments converted into 3-D.

Both the 2-D and 3-D versions are being released next month. Some 20 minutes of the film have been converted to 3-D, with visual cues — a green glasses symbol appears at the bottom of the screen — to indicate when to don the aids.

On Wednesday night, 450 delegates at a trade conference in Amsterdam were given a preview. They included Dennis Laws, general and technical manager of the Imax cinema in London, which will screen Superman Returns from July 14.

He said: “You felt you were there as part of the action. There are moments when you want to reach out and touch Superman as he whizzes past.”

But Cameron called for films to be shot completely in 3-D: “Superman was shot in 2-D, and then they dimensionalised part of it. I’m not a big fan of the dimensionalising process. If you’re making a film now, just shoot it in 3-D — not as an afterthought.”

The writer, producer and director, who produced hit films such as The Abyss, Aliens and True Lies, broke box-office records with Titanic, starring Kate Winslet and Leonardo DiCaprio. It made £1.1 billion, and won 11 Academy Awards, including an Oscar for Best Director. He would have made that film all in 3-D if he were shooting it today, Cameron said.

Richard Boyd, the head of technical services at the National Film Theatre, described 3-D cinema as “the future”.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 69,00.html

...And then in this second article, which covers a lot of the same ground, it says that he wants to re-release <i>Titanic</i> in 3-D and has already begun work on it:
http://www.variety.com/VR1117946102.html

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 7:17 pm
by Loomis
So Cameron 'does a Lucas': living off the success of a huge hit for years.

Surely he has another original idea in him somewhere?

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 7:20 pm
by Timon/Pumbaa fan
Great, now a film will never top Titanic's record. :roll:

C'monnnnnnn Pirates!

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 7:26 pm
by James
Loomis wrote:So Cameron 'does a Lucas': living off the success of a huge hit for years.

Surely he has another original idea in him somewhere?

Yeah, I know- I think that he should go into TV, do an Alan Ball (American Beauty, Six Feet Under), and create a super addictive TV show, that isn't about the Titanic, or boats, or water, or anything like that.
As you can see, I'm very into Six Feet Under at the moment. :)
-James

Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:55 pm
by Disneykid
Cameron is coming across very hypocritically to me. First he says that he doesn't like 2-D movies turned 3-D because the 3-D should be planned and not an afterthought. Now he goes and transfers Titanic into 3-D? He keeps milking that film for all its worth. It's cowardly of him not to dare to make a new film that isn't a low-key documentary. Titanic was not his only success. He is capable of making more good movies. He just seems too paranoid of Titanic comparisons to try to branch out.

Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:35 am
by Jules
But what is going to happen to the present day 2D format films?

Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:48 pm
by thatartguy
Cameron *IS* working on new movies right now. Two, in fact. One is based on Battle Angel Alita and he has another action film in the works. He's been filming short films in 3D and is planning on doing the same for his new movies.

Maybe his "hypocriticalness" of his previous statement was meaning that he didn't like people making 2D movies, then oter companies making them 3D without the original directors input.

Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 4:42 pm
by blackcauldron85
'Titanic' To Get A 3D Makeover: Start Planning To Dodge Icebergs & A Giant Sinking Ship Now!
http://hollywoodcrush.mtv.com/2009/07/2 ... -ship-now/
(via community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt)

:pink::pink::pink:

I will forever love Titanic, and I think I will have to see this in 3D when it comes out. So excited!!!

Posted: Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:22 pm
by Maerj
Loomis wrote:So Cameron 'does a Lucas': living off the success of a huge hit for years.

Surely he has another original idea in him somewhere?
Cameron's next much hyped film, Avatar is coming out in December, I believe.

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 3:57 pm
by ajmrowland
Wasn't that pushed back to summer with Shyamalan directing? Or are they two different movies?

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 4:35 pm
by Escapay
They're two entirely different movies.

James Cameron is directing Avatar, about humans possessing human-like bodies called Avatars.

M. Night Shyamalan is directing The Last Airbender, a live-action version of Nickelodeon's animated series "Avatar: The Last Airbender."

albert

Posted: Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:57 pm
by ajmrowland
Okay, thanks. I knew there was one for the nick series, but the James Cameron one sounds interesting.

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 6:57 am
by blackcauldron85
Oh. I was excited that someone posted something in this thread, but it's not even about Titanic. I see how it is. I'm excited, at least. :roll: :)

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:09 pm
by ajmrowland
We're talking Cameron, at least. It's not all titanic.

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:23 pm
by blackcauldron85
To me it is. :P I don't really follow him as a director or anything, but I do love me some Titanic...

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:26 pm
by ajmrowland
blackcauldron85 wrote:To me it is. :P I don't really follow him as a director or anything, but I do love me some Titanic...
Well, neither do I. But the topic title suggests Cameron's general views on, and future work with, 3D.

Posted: Tue Aug 04, 2009 3:28 pm
by blackcauldron85
Ohhh, I apparently wasn't paying attention. It is about more than just Titanic. My bad. :P

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 4:58 pm
by blackcauldron85
James Cameron Discusses Sending 3-D Cameras (And People) To Mars
http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/164584 ... tory.jhtml

Posted: Tue Aug 17, 2010 6:15 pm
by Kraken Guard
I dont know.. Titanic just doesn't seem like the type of movie to be in 3D.. :?

Also am not very thrilled with all this 3D Buisness.. It's almost like it takes absorbes more of the story for special effects.. Not sure. :oops:

Posted: Wed Aug 18, 2010 5:24 am
by KubrickFan
Kraken Guard wrote:I dont know.. Titanic just doesn't seem like the type of movie to be in 3D.. :?

Also am not very thrilled with all this 3D Buisness.. It's almost like it takes absorbes more of the story for special effects.. Not sure. :oops:
It's not like movies prior to this always had a great story :D.
I like 3D, but do think that movies should be shot that way, and not converted. Converting it to 3D is similar to colorizing black and white pictures. If you don't want to bother with the process, then don't bother with 3D at all.