Posted: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:26 pm
I like how everyone who reports the news kind of rolls their eyes. I think it was obvious to just about everyone except the 30 year old women who had crushes on him. 
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
Nope. You can't prove that. Me saying there is something in all of us that, little as it may be, tells people we are gay is not the same kind of giant sweeping statement as "all gay guys who have lisps are just doing it on purpose." Why would they do that? How do you think the stereotype of gays having lisps started in the first place? There must be a true connection.Escapay wrote:Only because they want to make it more obvious than others, and half of them don't have it naturally.Mike wrote:Escapay...of course it's a speech impediment, but one that seems to happen to more gay boys.
Hehehehehe...I DID have a lisp when I was younger! And I even went to a speech...person...I don't know if it was a therapist or not, but she had to help me get over my lisp over a good amount of sessions! And I happen to have pretty good teeth. Anyway, I think lisps are cute and you shouldn't stop them just because other people make fun of you or say it's wrong. You could say a man loving a man is wrong too. But I don't know if they're are good reasons to get rid of lisps besides people don't like them.Escapay wrote:Having a lisp is no picnic and became quite an annoyance once I realized I had it. Why you keep going on about how it's a sexuality thing when you don't have one (as far as I know) is totally beyond me. If it's part of your wishful thinking that secretly all guys are gay, please, just drop it now because that's certainly not the case.
That last sentence especially reveals that even if you say you have nothing against gay people, the thought of anyone thinking you are gay makes you cry. And I bet it's because your family has made you believe it is bad if you are. You can talk about how okay you think it is for your friends and other people to be gay all you want, but you revealed that you could not accept yourself being gay. Tim had many gay friends but couldn't take being it himself, until he stopped suppressing who he really was.Disney Villain wrote:I apologize for venting, but this is something that truly bothers me. There are certain people who don’t speak to me. When I make new friends they question my sexuality. Just because I’m not your stereotypical 19 year old boy, does not mean I’m gay. My own family questions me, and sometimes that makes me so upset I could cry.
If you found it, and still have my E-mail address...could I see it?!SpringHeelJack wrote:Hey, I remember that ad. Jockey. I might still have it somewhere.Disney's Divinity wrote:I remember an underwear advertisement in one of my mom's magazines, which was of a line of about 12 firemen with their pants down, that I kept for three months when I was around thirteen.
But your type is just your preference for certain looks. The kind of guys are like are not considered attractive to most people, but I am attracted to those looks. I can't believe you haven't found certain looks you like the most.Disney's Divinity wrote:Maybe it's just me, but it's hard for me to find a person beautiful or ugly. Sure, there are some that are more or less attractive than what you usually see, but I don't think of them as "superior/inferior" in looks. Just different. Hence the reason I don't have a particular "type".
Speaking of which, has anyone noticed that when certain celebrities come out, male of female, perception of that person changes dramatically?lord-of-sith wrote:While I'm glad that more celebs are comming out in the public, I do kinda wish it were one's who weren't COMPLETELY obvious, hahaha. But good for them none the less!
This has a lot to do with how young men handle sexuality. I've seen young men accept their sexuality, and their families accept it as well. And the first thing they do is dress and act like a woman.lord-of-sith wrote:I agree completely pap64!
I try to follow that philosophy myself. At school and when I'm around my friends, I act just as I always have and my personality and sense of humor and all of that has changed zero (though we're now able to slide in the occasional joke now and then, which is just fine).
And I wouldn't be surprised (though gossip spreads like wild fire at my school) if there were those who didn't know about my sexual preferences, and like being around me due to my personality, which is how it should be. The one thing I stressed when I decided to tell people was that I wasn't any different of a person! Luckily, I think it's worked for the most part.
Actually, I think it was the fact that his family continually questions him that made him cry. If he's not gay, then why should he not be mad when people constantly say/suppose he is? It's no different than, say, assuming that because you're a woman you're naturally a gossip or busybody. It's a wide generalization that's offensive in and of itself.That last sentence especially reveals that even if you say you have nothing against gay people, the thought of anyone thinking you are gay makes you cry. And I bet it's because your family has made you believe it is bad if you are. You can talk about how okay you think it is for your friends and other people to be gay all you want, but you revealed that you could not accept yourself being gay. Tim had many gay friends but couldn't take being it himself, until he stopped suppressing who he really was.Disney Villain wrote:I apologize for venting, but this is something that truly bothers me. There are certain people who don’t speak to me. When I make new friends they question my sexuality. Just because I’m not your stereotypical 19 year old boy, does not mean I’m gay. My own family questions me, and sometimes that makes me so upset I could cry.
If you read my post: "Sure, there are some that are more or less attractive than what you usually see, but I don't think of them as 'superior/inferior' in looks." I personally find it not only impossible, but degrading to have a "type" of person you're looking for. No two people are alike completely. Sure, two people might have dark hair and rugged features, but one might have thick thighs while the other has thin arms. Noone's completely the same and to say you can only be attracted to "such-and-such who has A and B" is kind of ridiculus in my opinion. I've found many men attractive and not all of them fall under the same "type." Some were older, some pale, some hairy, some tall, some with curly hair, and so on. I can't honestly say that I prefer one to another as they're all equally satisfying. Meaning the looks have very little to do with a relationship for me as they're almost never a problem.Disney Duster wrote:But your type is just your preference for certain looks. The kind of guys are like are not considered attractive to most people, but I am attracted to those looks. I can't believe you haven't found certain looks you like the most.Disney's Divinity wrote:Maybe it's just me, but it's hard for me to find a person beautiful or ugly. Sure, there are some that are more or less attractive than what you usually see, but I don't think of them as "superior/inferior" in looks. Just different. Hence the reason I don't have a particular "type".
This reminds me of my pet peeve with the Gay Pride Parades. How can you take individuals, who are promoting the reality that two same-gender people can love each other equally as much as those of separate gender, seriously when it seems the only thing they present to the public is an image of promiscuity, superficiality and one-night-stands? What about the gay students, politicians, artists, teachers, older [long-term] couples, parents and everything else? Can we all be summed up in the degrading, sex-oriented mindset that pervades every inch of the parades? They have good ideas, to be sure (be proud and unashamed of who you are--especially when you don't find the life you're leading shameful), but they're flawed in their execution.pap64 wrote:I've always believed, and sorry if I offend anyone here, that if gay people want to be taken seriously they NEED to act seriously.
I wanted to mention this earlier, but didn't want to potentially offend anyone that believed in this.Disney's Divinity wrote:This reminds me of my pet peeve with the Gay Pride Parades. How can you take individuals, who are promoting the reality that two same-gender people can love each other equally as much as those of separate gender, seriously when it seems the only thing they present to the public is an image of promiscuity, superficiality and one-night-stands? What about the gay students, politicians, artists, couples, parents and everything else? Can we all be summed up in the degrading, sex-oriented mindset that pervades every inch of the parades? They have good ideas in mind (be proud and unashamed of who you are), but they're flawed in their execution.I've always believed, and sorry if I offend anyone here, that if gay people want to be taken seriously they NEED to act seriously.
But it actually is different. A gossip and a busybody are thought of as very negative things to be. In his mind, so is being gay!Disney's Divinity wrote:If he's not gay, then why should he not be mad when people constantly say/suppose he is? It's no different than, say, assuming that because you're a woman you're naturally a gossip or busybody. It's a wide generalization that's offensive in and of itself.
Well, I didn't say you were only attracted to you types. I don't go out only looking for one type of person, I want to give everyone a chance! Personally, I recognize many attractive people, but I noticed I'm more attracted to teddy bears than the usual Hollywood celebs. It's just what you notice you like the most. You really haven't found what you like the most looks wise, just, you know, noticed it?Disney Duster wrote:I personally find it not only impossible, but degrading to have a "type" of person you're looking for. No two people are alike completely. Sure, two people might have dark hair and rugged features, but one might have thick thighs while the other has thin arms. Noone's completely the same and to say you can only be attracted to "such-and-such who has A and B" is kind of ridiculus in my opinion. I've found many men attractive and not all of them fall under the same "type." Some were older, some pale, some hairy, some tall, some with curly hair, and so on. I can't honestly say that I prefer one to another as they're all equally satisfying. Meaning the looks have very little to do with a relationship for me as they're almost never a problem.
I said that this was going to be hard to argue because you are right in that if people are happy being that way they shouldn't hold it back. But there's also no denying that it works like a double edged knife. While you are happy showing your life style you are leading people to the belief that homosexuality means make up, feathers, parties and endless sex. Its part of homosexuality, sure, but a very small part of it.Disney Duster wrote:pap64 and Divinity: Okay, if pride is about being prideful of who you are, being yourself, who's to say those guys in the pride parades aren't just being prideful about how they like to dress like women or they like to be sexy and promiscuous? It's just letting everyone do what they want to do because it's who they are and what they like to do, and for some reason those "types" of guys or girls are the ones who are always in the parades. If you think about it, the ones who are the proudest probably are the ones who like showing the world that they're gay, but they probably also genuinely like those things, too. Can you imagine guys with rooms full of all this guy stuff just to show the whole world they're gay, but really, secretly, they hate it? Why would you waste your cash and time and space on all that?
I suppose that's true, but I hate that that's the impression the entire world seems to form about gay people as the result of it (and many other examples on TV and film). I don't like being compared to that side of gay life, but unfortunately I always am because I'm gay. I'm sure a respectable woman wouldn't enjoy being compared to a tramp either.Disney Duster wrote: Okay, if pride is about being prideful of who you are, being yourself, who's to say those guys in the pride parades aren't just being prideful about how they like to dress like women or they like to be sexy and promiscuous? It's just letting everyone do what they want to do because it's who they are and what they like to do, and for some reason those "types" of guys or girls are the ones who are always in the parades.
I've actually never really known who Liza Minelli is, I hear her name and draw a blank.pap64 wrote:I know I am pushing the issue, but I want to make this clear.
If you are gay and you like women's clothing, being trendy, sleeping with men, dressing up like a woman, wearing makeup and being openly gay that's FINE.
What I am talking about here is to not promote it as part of homosexuality or that people who are gay act this way too. That's what I am against. When was the last time you saw a serious portrayal of a gay guy? Very rarely because people are still holding on to the fact that all gay guys worship Liza Minelli, all gay guys wear excessive make up and feathers and that ALL gay guys can't be conservative or serious about their sexuality.
Just look at "Brokeback Mountain". Its supposedly a great drama and a very powerful love story, nominated for an Academy Award. What did people do? Make fun of it because it was a "gay cowboy movie", even though it presented a very serious side of homosexuality. And why is that? Because people see homosexuality as a JOKE, a joke that is sometimes pushed by the gay community. I understand that they can take a joke, but when they strive to say that "This is how ALL gay people are" it sends the cause back.
We can proud of who we are without openly expressing it. To me, being proud means being humble about it and strive for big dreams despite your stance in life. Not breaking out the American flag at any event isn't being un-patriotic. Not writing about your culture doesn't make you a hater, and not wearing women's clothing doesn't make you lose your homosexuality.
Not admitting who you really are is the real example of anti-pride. Being gay and not wearing women's clothes is not losing your homosexuality.
Y'know, I watched Cabaret... wasn't too impressed.carolinakid wrote:Hey, CB, to get a quick lesson in Liza Minelli watch Cabaret (1972). It's well worth your time!![]()
Jon