Last night I thought it would be interesting to make a comparison list of the RottenTomatoes critic / audience scores just for myself. Then I decided to do it for all the films this morning (even some I don't really think of as "remakes" exactly, like
Oz and
Christopher Robin) and post it here as food for thought:
Alice in Wonderland 2010
Critics: 51% (276 reviews)
Audience: 55% (480,200 user ratings)
Oz the Great and Powerful 2013
Critics: 57% (268 reviews)
Audience: 56% (292,900 user ratings)
Cinderella 2015
Critics: 84% (246 reviews)
Audience: 78% (77,700 user ratings)
Maleficent 2014
Critics: 53% (268 reviews)
Audience: 70% (176,300 user ratings)
Alice Through the Looking Glass 2016
Critics: 29% (254 reviews)
Audience: 48% (37,800 user ratings)
The Jungle Book 2016
Critics: 94% (322 reviews)
Audience: 86% (94,600 user ratings)
Pete's Dragon 2016
Critics: 88% (240 reviews)
Audience: 72% (37,100 user ratings)
Beauty and the Beast 2017
Critics: 71% (374 reviews)
Audience: 80% (86,300 user ratings)
Mary Poppins Returns 2018
Critics: 79% (370 reviews)
Audience: 65% (7,300 user ratings)
Christopher Robin 2018
Critics: 73% (270 reviews)
Audience: 83% (5,700 user ratings)
Aladdin 2019
Critics: 57% (370 reviews)
Audience: 94% (59,000 user ratings)
Lady and the Tramp 2019
Critics: 66% (64 reviews)
Audience: 51% (650 user ratings)
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil 2019
Critics: 40% (251 reviews)
Audience: 95% (19,100 user ratings)
The Lion King 2019
Critics: 52% (420 reviews)
Audience: 88% (76,300 user ratings)
Dumbo 2020
Critics: 46% (362 reviews)
Audience: 48% (4,400 user ratings)
Mulan 2020 (I'll update as the numbers shift over the next few days)
Critics: 73% (300 reviews)
Audience: 49% (10,125 user ratings)
Audience Ratings Ranked:
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil 2019 95%*
Aladdin 2019 94%
The Lion King 2019 88%
The Jungle Book 2016 86%
Christopher Robin 2018 83%
Beauty and the Beast 2017 80%
Cinderella 2015 78%
Pete's Dragon 2016 72%
Maleficent 2014 70%
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 65%
Oz the Great and Powerful 2013 56%
Alice in Wonderland 2010 55%
Lady and the Tramp 2019 51%
Mulan 2020 49%
Dumbo 2020 48%
Alice Through the Looking Glass 2016 48%
*
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil’s is the only one that’s weird. But, if you notice, the number of audience ratings for it is dwarfed by the number for the first
Maleficent (176,000 v. 19,000 ratings). My guess is its high audience score is due to the fact that only the people who liked the first film actually watched / rated the second, which is why it’s higher than makes sense.

You’d think the same would’ve been true for
Alice Through the Looking Glass, but, tbh, I think I can understand it. I ended up disappointed by that film even as someone who was vaguely interested in seeing more of HBC’s and Hathaway’s characters. *shrug*
Critics Ratings Ranked:
The Jungle Book 2016 94%
Pete's Dragon 2016 88%
Cinderella 2015 84%
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 79%
Christopher Robin 2018 73%
Mulan 2020 73%
Beauty and the Beast 2017 71%
Lady and the Tramp 2019 66%
Aladdin 2019 57%
Oz the Great and Powerful 2013 57%
Maleficent 2014 2014 53%
The Lion King 2019 52%
Alice in Wonderland 2010 51%
Dumbo 2020 46%
Maleficent: Mistress of Evil 2019 40%
Alice Through the Looking Glass 2016 29%
The most recent films in particular highlight how out-of-tune the critics have become with audiences.
estefan wrote:I get the sense it's frustrating being Disney and hearing different audience demands for the remakes. "The Lion King" and "Beauty and the Beast" were knocked for being too close to the animated film, while before release, there were already complaints of "Mulan" lacking songs and Mushu. And there also seems to be a divide with "Mulan" from critics who are pleased it's not a carbon copy and audiences who are underwhelmed at the lack of elements from the animated film. If I was running Disney, I would be thinking "So you don't want the same movie? But you also want the same movie?"
I don't think it's that complicated. It's clear critics and audiences aren't on the same page with the re-makes, especially the last couple of years... Critics want something new and audiences want a re-make to be, well, a re-make of what they liked in the first place. Is Disney looking to create "new," quality films that please critics with this re-make fad of theirs? Or are they looking to make money / build franchises, which requires pleasing audiences the first go 'round in order to get them to come back for more? Even if we pretended Disney was making these simply to create quality films (they're not), I can't help but feel it would be a pointless endeavor to chase the critics considering the best of the re-makes are still pretty bad quality-wise, aren't they? And the awards shows would never make over them regardless.
As far as the audience reaction,
Mulan's down there with
Alice so far.
Maleficent's sequel actually managed to hit half a billion at the box office, which still wasn't enough for Disney to consider it successful, and the first
Maleficent did better with the audience than
Mulanis currently doing (again, so far). I hope they're not dumb enough to give
Mulan II an enormous budget otherwise they're about to repeat the mistake they made with
Alice Through the Looking Glass. I remember feeling snookered by how bad
Alice in Wonderland turned out when the trailers looked really good. I imagine a similar thing is happening with
Mulan here, with people feeling cheated out of what the marketing was selling them. Why would they come back for a sequel if you've left them feeling that way? And the film having been priced so high will just rub salt in the wound for those who fell for it.