Page 44 of 45
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2008 11:35 pm
by yukitora
Are you guys serious? TLM II was horrible because Ariel was old? That's rather sickening.
You must've hated the three good fairies in Sleeping Beauty, and Sophie in Howl's Moving Castle. Is it really bad to see your hero age?
Anyhow I read somewhere that Ariel must be logically 42 or something years old. It doesn't sound right, but does anyone know what age exactly she should be by the end of TLM II?
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:19 am
by Cordy_Biddle
Ariel was, I believe, sixteen years old in the original "Little Mermaid". I would imagine that in the second movie she'd be in her mid-twenties or approaching 30.
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 2:58 am
by pap64
Sorry for bringing back the dead (

) but I saw "Cinderella III" yesterday and noticed something very funny.
In the scene in which the Stepsisters have a food fight, they make a BIG mess and destroy the giant cake in the middle of the room. When Prince Charming and The King step in you can see for a brief second the Prince slipping on the frosting, then looking at his shoes.
I know its a very small detail, but I thought that they added a cute and funny touch to the scene. Not to mention that it adds a bit of humanity to the Prince because its ALWAYS expected for the comic relief character to slip and fall while the "cool" characters keep standing.
Oh, and the movie is still good

.
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:21 am
by Ariel'sprince
Prince Charmign slipped? I don't remember this part,I need to see Cinderella III again.
And something that bothers me about the film-Where were the other birds? and the mice? and Bruno? and Major? this film only had 2 birds and Jaq and Gus,that's all she had in this movie from the million of mice and birds she had in the film.
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:30 am
by pap64
Ariel'sprince wrote:Prince Charmign slipped? I don't remember this part,I need to see Cinderella III again.
He doesn't fall, though, but he does slip on the frosting, and looks at his shoe afterwards.
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 3:34 am
by Ariel'sprince
Oh,still I don't remember that

.
I don't think he whould fall.
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:35 am
by yukitora
lol, what a cute moment pap!
yeah this movie was great for finally expanding Charming's character. If only "The Prince" was given such an opportunity.
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:15 am
by supertalies
yukitora wrote:If only "The Prince" was given such an opportunity.
Snow White II?
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
No, thank you!
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 6:37 am
by Ariel'sprince
How about Enchanted Tales?.
(And there's a Princess book called Enchanted Stables I think and it has a story about Snow White and his hourse goes to rescue him,maybe there's more about his personality there).
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:57 pm
by Coolmanio
I dont think I could deal with a Snow White II, and I am glad that Disney is done with Animated Classic sequels.
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:08 pm
by Escapay
Happily Ever After anyone?
Abysmal movie and I love it for all the wrong reasons, and a few right ones as well.
albert
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 4:45 pm
by bradhig
I would like a Snow White II. A few years ago they said they would do a SWII and then they gave in to the dark side and cancled it cause of winny people on the net not wanting it.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 2:14 am
by supertalies
bradhig wrote:I would like a Snow White II. A few years ago they said they would do a SWII and then they gave in to the dark side and cancled it cause of winny people on the net not wanting it.
Wasn't that a april's fool joke?
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:24 am
by yukitora
I'd want it too.
Disney hasn't messed with their most prestigious film yet. Aside from the countless Snow White clip-art, they've been quite respectful to Walt's masterpiece.
SO IF THEY DID MAKE A SEQUEL, I'm sure they'd pay it the greatest of attention rather than give to to some newb movie director like Peggy Holmes who just does didn't understand what The Little Mermaid was about at all, as evident through Jodi Benson's interviews.
But my 10 year old sister said she DID like it better than the original, so maybe she did well in making a film directed solely for children. And this is my sister who has seen ALL the disney feature films from snow white to MTR, except for Saludos Amigos and bits of Fantasia.
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 7:45 pm
by Coolmanio
Just wondering, does anyone have the soundtrack to Cindy 3? I love the songs but I cant find it anywhere and I do not have the movie so I cant rip the songs myself. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Re: Cinderella III: A Twist in Time DVD Press Release/Discus
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 10:28 am
by WillytheDino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bOKGmin8G7M
This video popped up in my YouTube timeline and I wanted to post it here. I had forgotten how funny Cinderella III was.
Re: Cinderella III: A Twist in Time DVD Press Release/Discus
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:57 pm
by Redadoodles
I wish the film was made for a theatre release a la Return To Neverland.I mean,with a bigger budget and some small changes, it could have been a true classic that would have erased the first sequel from our minds...
The only thing that bothers me in A Twist In Time is how much they make a big deal out of the whole touching of the hands thing as it is supposed to reveal your one true love. However, in the original the prince never touched Cinderella's hands. She was wearing gloves the entire time she was at the ball, even when she touched the water from the fountain during "So This Is Love" so it doesn't add up with the third film. I wouldn't make a big deal out of it if the screen writers didn't make out of big deal of it haha.
Re: Cinderella III: A Twist in Time DVD Press Release/Discus
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2021 1:52 am
by Disney Duster
I wish it had been theatrical, too, and called just Cinderella: A Twist in Time.
The idea of the touching hands thing is you just have to touch hands at all. The love passes through the gloves.
Re: Cinderella III: A Twist in Time DVD Press Release/Discus
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2021 1:59 am
by Redadoodles
Disney Duster wrote:I wish it had been theatrical, too, and called just Cinderella: A Twist in Time.
The idea of the touching hands thing is you just have to touch hands at all. The love passes through the gloves.
Yeah... no, I'm not buying it.

Re: Cinderella III: A Twist in Time DVD Press Release/Discus
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2021 2:51 am
by Farerb
I'm sorry but I didn't find any of the jokes here funny at all. It's clearly aimed for children, and that's fine since that's what the DTVs were all about, but it's just not my thing. The original had a subtle humor with the mice and lucifer and some with the stepsisters, but accidentally hitting your sister with a flute or accidentally standing on your dress is not the same as over the top clumsiness all around.