SwordInTheStone777 wrote:If this how Disney is going to treat this release then I have Offically lost all respect for the whole Walt Disney Company.
It took you this long after what...3 years of mediocre releases?
They first lost some of my respect when slipcovers started appearing and trailers started disappearing.
They lost more of my respect after the insult-to-a-viewer's-intelligence EasyFind icons and FastPlay feature were added.
They lost a huge chunk of my respect when
Tarzan and
The Emperor's New Groove were downgraded to single-discs while
Lilo & Stitch: Special Edition remained in R1 release limbo.
Then, they finally lost all my respect when
Peter Pan was given such a crappy "Platinum" treatment and deserved so much more.
There's no point in hoping for the glory days of 2001-2004.
PatrickvD wrote:is it really THAT hard to include a gallery, theatrical trailer, small making of and story origin feature?
A gallery is included: "The Sword in the Stone Scrapbook". Unless you mean a more in-depth gallery that's more than the 60 images and 8 text screens.
I have a sad feeling that the Disneyland episode may be dropped (but if it's part of that ever-teasing ever-annoying "And Much More!" tag, I won't be surprised).
Spring, Jack! Heel, Jack! wrote:...is anyone really shocked?
Nope.
I was stupidly hoping that they could have at least culled together some old interviews (either from the Disney Studio Album series, or additional comments made during interviews for other DVDs) into a hasty 10-minute featurette. That'd at least be something worth upgrading for. The Doctor Who DVDs do that all the time (ask the interview subjects during the interview session about more than one serial than the one that they're mainly being interviewed for, that way they can use those comments for a future documentary). Disney should really start "banking" interviews for future use.
SITS777 wrote:I think we should boycot anything Disney, and watch them lose millions and millions of dollars, as well as losing loyal and dear fans.
Yes, a few hundred angry fans can boycott Disney while a few million Soccer Moms and Joe Sixpacks buy the stuff anyway.
Matt wrote:The only thing worthy of this DVD is the slip cover LOL
I'm only laughing because that's likely what the majority of new buyers may think!
TonyWDA wrote:Man, tough crowd. IT'S JUST A RE-RELEASE PEOPLE!!!
<snip>
The movie is still a classic!
You said it, Tony!
TonyWDA wrote:No one ever said it was a Platinum Edition.
Frankly, I have no idea why people are still clinging to the idea of a non-Platinum two-disc DVD...
Spring, Jack! Heel, Jack! Come Up With A Nickname For Me To Call You, Jack! wrote:In case you haven't noticed, we may complain about the quality of the DVDs, but when all is said and done, we buy them anyway.

So true.
Anyway, perhaps the only reason I have to rebuy this is the theatrical ratio being available.
(and if I hear one more word from someone that's along the lines of "OMG, they're matting the picture, I want the full animated picture! How dare Disney provide the theatrical ratio! Give me the full animated picture, and to hell with those that want the theatrical ratio! Appease us, not them!" I will throw a pink elephant at them and have the elephant stomp their eyes out. I can understand both sides of the argument regarding matted animation, but why is it some people are always so damn insistent on believing in only one and forcing that belief on others? Seriously! And to anyone reading this, I'm sorry for the mini-rant).
Albert