DVDizzy Forum

I bought this earlier today just because I got my paycheck and Shopko's on the way home from work. I bought it on a whim so no coupon so the 2-disc Combo was still about $27

And here's the last deleted scene (Vigor the Visionary):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYQC_70WH50

mokka456 wrote:And here's the last deleted scene (Vigor the Visionary):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYQC_70WH50

Thanks!!

Here's a video about people who worked on Tangled:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg6A6qx3 ... ded#at=250

mokka456 wrote:Here's a video about people who worked on Tangled:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jg6A6qx3 ... ded#at=250

I love Bon Iver, beautiful music and very fitting for WDAS in its current state. bittersweet.

mokka456 wrote:And here's the Chemistry Develops one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJVke1ethJw

It's official: Rapunzel is my new favorite princess.

Even in rough sketches, they make her so huggable.

BK wrote:Not going to waste my time looking into pages of nonsensical DD talk and while humourous, neither do I want to read people bashing that nonsense because it's so futile.

Why is it nonsense? I'm discussing how the film could be more like past Disney films, and be more Disney. And I give reasons.

Meanwhile most other people are saying how cute Rapunzel is. Yea, she is.

Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!

Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!

Oh, God.

Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!

And then they changed it, why? Because they realized it wasn't working. So you see, they chose to do what was better for the movie, so they could tell the story in a manner that could interest and entertain the audience. Because if you can't get people interested in the movie, then what was the point of making it in the first place?

Honestly, does the storybook opening even works anymore? The last couple of times I've seen it, in Shrek and Enchanted, it was pretty much used as a parody.

Disney Duster wrote:Why is it nonsense?

Because Disney is gone. no one else is disney, no one should be trying to emulate someone to the degree that you push it. If you set out to make a film that is "Disney" or "Pixar", "Dreamworks" whatever your doomed from the start because your putting a movie into a box that it needs not to be in. every director does things differently and should be allowed to do things that they feel is for the best. creative minds, if allowed will redefine what it means in the first place to be "Disney". the more you try to pretend to know what Walt might have done the more inbread and bland everything becomes.

^Yet another solid piece of common sense that Duster will either totally ignore or twist into something else or twist his own argument to either accodomate or fight the new development.

The way I see it, Tangled had every ingredient of a solid Disney movie. Too many of them in fact. The same formula grows a tad stale after awhile no matter how you dress it.

Disney Duster wrote:Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!

DisneyDuster wrote:This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do

Can I ask, who exactly said that they felt it was a Disney thing to do?

Here's a catalogue site (i think) with Tangled things:

http://online-fremdfigurenkatalog.de/se ... 7bc&page=1

Disney Duster, you're talking about Disney making movies today that would reflect the 50's as though they were made in that decade. Disney doesn't have the mindset for making the movies like those from the 50's because most of the people that worked on the films then are dead, retired, etc. Also take into consideration that movie audiences of today are interested in differents things from the audiences of the 50's.

Disney Duster wrote:
Anyway, they not only were thinking of having a storybook opening, but having Mother Gothel keep the flower in her garden behind walls, just like in the original fairy tale! This was more Disney than what they did in the final film. So you see, it's so Disney, they were even considering doing it at one point, because they felt it was a Disney thing to do!

When I was watching that deleted scene, the first thing I said to my self is :

"Duster is going to bring this up on UD and use it to say they had right idea of disney ness blah blah blah but noooooo blah blah blah..... "


i'm psychic.

PatrickvD wrote:

*snort*

*wipes beer off his computer screen*

This has become one of my favorite Rapunzel pics from dA.

my favorite Rapunzel fanart is not appropriate for here unfortunately

Super Aurora wrote:my favorite Rapunzel fanart is not appropriate for here unfortunately

There's so much great fanart for this movie...makes me so happy.