Page 40 of 90
Rapunzel
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:35 pm
by Disney Duster
More than concept art, that's more like a 3-D still that rotated around and showed all dimensions and sides! That's no mere sketch, that's what a finished film still would look like. 3-D CGI that looks like a painting.
I agree, if they just made the film exactly like that, it'd be perfect in look.
Re: Rapunzel
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 2:54 pm
by ajmrowland
Disney Duster wrote:More than concept art, that's more like a 3-D still that rotated around and showed all dimensions and sides! That's no mere sketch, that's what a finished film still would look like. 3-D CGI that looks like a painting.
I agree, if they just made the film exactly like that, it'd be perfect in look.
Not even close. It'd be way too much on such a production.
Rapunzel
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 3:58 pm
by Disney Duster
BUT that is what Glen Keane always intended! For the film's animation to look exactly like that finished still!
Re: Rapunzel
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:04 pm
by nomad2010
ajmrowland wrote:Disney Duster wrote:More than concept art, that's more like a 3-D still that rotated around and showed all dimensions and sides! That's no mere sketch, that's what a finished film still would look like. 3-D CGI that looks like a painting.
I agree, if they just made the film exactly like that, it'd be perfect in look.
Not even close. It'd be way too much on such a production.
what i don't understand is with all the technology we have, you'd think we' just be able to tell computers to make it look that way.. you know?
Re: Rapunzel
Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:22 pm
by Super Aurora
nomad2010 wrote:ajmrowland wrote:
Not even close. It'd be way too much on such a production.
what i don't understand is with all the technology we have, you'd think we' just be able to tell computers to make it look that way.. you know?
Our technology is not THAT advance yet.
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 1:49 am
by Old Fish Tale
Not exactly new...
01
02
03
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:17 am
by blackcauldron85
On the picture on the right on "02", is that the witch?!? Is that the first we've seen of her?!? It looks like concept art, but it's still exciting to me!
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:09 am
by Rumpelstiltskin
What I don't understand is why they have decided to use the Disney animation from the 50's as an inspiration. This style has already inspired the look of The Princess and the Frog. Somewhere in the future, we could hopefully have a movie based on the style from the peak of the 40's.
As it has already been quoted in this thread:
“The design of (this) film will try to put … a fresh twist on a 1950s retro vibe. “Byron and I are such huge fans of Disneyland, and of Fantasyland in particular,” Nathan says. “The architecture of Fantasyland is nostalgic 1950s Fantasyland. There’s real appeal and style that are used in films like Cinderella, so we’re doing research on that style …”
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:47 am
by Mooky
I've said some negative things about this movie before, but if the finished product manages to look anything like that third pic (which is only concept art, I presume), I'm gonna have to eat my words.
Is Kristin Chenoweth still the voice of Rapunzel? Because it seems they based the character's looks off of her.
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:28 am
by KubrickFan
Mooky wrote:
Is Kristin Chenoweth still the voice of Rapunzel? Because it seems they based the character's looks off of her.
I don't think there's any news on that, only rumors. Apparently, according to IMDb David Schwimmer and Peter Sallis (Wallace from the claymation films) are also in this. I don't know whether there's any truth to that, but it would be good.
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:09 pm
by Jules
If David Schwimmer is
really in I'll be
really psyched!
Posted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:11 pm
by goofystitch
I hope it's true. David Schwimmer has a voice made for animation and he was my favorite part of Madagascar.
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 3:45 pm
by Jules
Is this an authentic David Schwimmer Facebook page? Or is it fanmade? It's difficult to tell with these celebrities ...
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id= ... ref=search
Posted: Thu Jul 23, 2009 11:12 pm
by singerguy04
If its really him then I am a lot more popular, lol.
Anyhow, I would really love for him to be a voice in this film. Do you think he'd be the prince?
Posted: Fri Jul 24, 2009 7:22 am
by Mooky
That's definitely fake. Besides, I doubt he'd use a publicity photo for his profile pic... Nobody's that vain.
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:39 pm
by skyler888
Rapunzel
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:52 pm
by Disney Duster
Yes, and it's all superbly beautiful, pretty perfect. I love it.
And look, instead of that plain tower in the clouds in the concept we got with the prince scaling the tower, they used the original, better, more beautiful tower with the roomier, house-on-top-of-the-tower-like structure. The OLD one on the left is the original, the NEW one on the right is based close to it:
I admit, I prefer the original's even roomier housier version, but it's nice that it's there at all...
But notice how in the original OLD one on the left, the painting is more detailed, rich, buttery, and rococco, the Fragonard look Glen Keane was going for? I hope they keep that, and don't make it just "painterly" like the new one makes me fear.
Re: Rapunzel
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 7:50 pm
by nomad2010
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 8:44 pm
by Rumpelstiltskin
I was just gonna post that. Guess I was a little too late.
Is that a tiny beard I see at the tip of the prince's chin? I hope not.
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:19 pm
by nomad2010
Rumpelstiltskin wrote:I was just gonna post that. Guess I was a little too late.
Is that a tiny beard I see at the tip of the prince's chin? I hope not.
i noticed that too. it's only concept art though.
