Page 36 of 74

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:05 pm
by Escapay
blackcauldron85 wrote:^ Is that due to PAL speedup/slowdown/whatever?
Yes. PAL runs 4% faster than NTSC, as it is 25fps rather than 24fps.

126 minutes in PAL is 114 minutes (1991 BBFC classification for the video)

74 minutes in PAL is 71 minutes (2000 BBFC classification for the video)


albert

Posted: Fri Aug 13, 2010 2:36 am
by miniroll32
That doesn't make sense, because the 2000 release had more content than the 1991 version.

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:17 am
by KubrickFan
singerguy04 wrote:Personally, I almost support the edit in Fantasia. I do believe Sunflower to be unacceptable by today's standards, and being that she's such a tiny unimportant part of the sequence I don't mind her being cut. My biggest problem with it is the tiny blurp in the music where the cut occurs. If she does appear in the film I wouldn't be outraged or anything, but I don't see why disney would risk a possible media superstorm for a few seconds of obscure footage. True, it was someone's hard work that went into the creation of Sunflower, but much worse cuts have been made in films before. It's just a part of the business.

I know it sounds hypocritical because I believe Song of the South should be released, but there's a huge difference for me between an entire film and a few seconds of film.
Censorship is censorship. It's as simple as that. If it's either a couple of seconds, or an entire movie, doesn't matter.
By the way, there aren't any cuts, not since the 1991 restoration. The footage is either zoomed in to remove the centaurette, or she's painted out.
You could reverse the argument, of course. Would anyone really make so much fuss for just a couple of seconds worth of footage? Yes, it's stereotypical, but should every stereotype from every movie be removed? There will always be people who might be offended by it.

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:23 am
by miniroll32
I think they may do a 'paint' job on this to get past the censorship. In Peter Pan, they changed the hues of the Indian Chief so that he wasn't as red (ridiculous, I know) and that was one of the early Lowry restorations too for the Platinum line. The only problem with doing this though is that the centurette has other body features that are stereotyped, so it's really up in the air.

In my opinion, I think they'll retain the original look of the scenes without zooming simply because the Diamond Edition line is supposed to be 'the best of the best' in terms of restoration and original presentation. Either way, during the restoration Lowry will have been able to look at the scenes in lots of detail :)

To me, the main problem with censorship is that people are willing to make the most fuss over the visual context of racism from production, and much less over other features of Disney films such as lyrics. There are so many examples of crude lyrics within these films, but they rarely get mentioned. If censorship aims for equality, then someone is doing a very poor job...

Lets just hope Disney release Fantasia uncut. Let by-gones be by-gones and accept that the state of mind back in the late 1930's/40's was very, very different to now, and to be thankful we live in a much fairer society.

After all, how are we ever going to accept this when the evidence is just so obviously swept under the carpet?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 12:11 pm
by KubrickFan
miniroll32 wrote: Lets just hope Disney release Fantasia uncut. Let by-gones be by-gones and accept that the state of mind back in the late 1930's/40's was very, very different to now, and to be thankful we live in a much fairer society.

After all, how are we ever going to accept this when the evidence is just so obviously swept under the carpet?
Well, not really, since titles like The Lion King, The Little Mermaid and Aladdin were still edited.

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 5:22 pm
by miniroll32
Fantasia product page now live on Amazon.co.uk!

Also available... "Fantasia Double Play"

*cue 'Oooohs' and 'Arrrrrrs'*

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 5:43 pm
by tlc38tlc38
miniroll32 wrote:Fantasia product page now live on Amazon.co.uk!

Also available... "Fantasia Double Play"

*cue 'Oooohs' and 'Arrrrrrs'*
Says it's coming out in the UK Nov. 8th. I wonder if this is also gonna be the US release date?

What is Double Play?

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 5:47 pm
by miniroll32
Maybe thats the box set with Fantasia 2000? Afterall, F2K isn't listed separately.

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 5:48 pm
by UmbrellaFish
tlc38tlc38 wrote:
miniroll32 wrote:Fantasia product page now live on Amazon.co.uk!

Also available... "Fantasia Double Play"

*cue 'Oooohs' and 'Arrrrrrs'*
Says it's coming out in the UK Nov. 8th. I wonder if this is also gonna be the US release date?

What is Double Play?
Better not be another Dumbo...

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 5:52 pm
by miniroll32
Maybe 'double play' is just the new marketing title for the Blu-Ray + DVD combo? This could explain why no DVD's are listed.

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:14 pm
by MutantEnemy
miniroll32 wrote:Maybe 'double play' is just the new marketing title for the Blu-Ray + DVD combo? This could explain why no DVD's are listed.
You're right. I went on to investigate and it says that Iron Man 2 is a triple play, meaning Blu-ray,DVD, and Digital Copy.

Mystery solved!

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 9:50 pm
by tlc38tlc38
They've been added to the German Amazon site with cover art.

here's the link:

http://forum.blu-ray.com/blu-ray-movies ... -a-24.html

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 10:42 pm
by Tristy
Oh you gotta be kidding me! It's the same cover art as before?

I was expecting something more different like having a cover where most of the characters are interacting. Like Chernabog dominating the top, the Sprite flying around Mickey, Donald catching hold of a star and the fairies flying with the sprite!

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:04 pm
by singerguy04
I know what you mean, I've been hoping for some new cover art as well. Maybe the US will get something new!

Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2010 11:46 pm
by Scamander
Tristy wrote:Oh you gotta be kidding me! It's the same cover art as before?
It's not the final cover art, but just temporary.

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:35 am
by MutantEnemy
Is cover art REALLY that important. I'll take the same cover art as long as we can buy these THIS year!!!

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 9:53 am
by miniroll32
I know what you mean, I guess some people just see it as an addition of the product. From Disneys point also, the artwork makes a big difference to the selling point. They can target a specific audience based on whats on the cover, and with this in mind, I hope they don't place some crude imagery and dumb down the nature of the film.

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:32 am
by Mason_Ireton
I'd suggest they reuse the 80s/90s poster for Fantasia and have a new cover for Fantasia 2000.

At least there's no memorable disney song that can be ruined by Disney Channel, but I wouldn't mind having a upcoming orchestra or a school orchestra perform one of segements.

Jonas Bros already performed Blue Danube on their show, Jonas last year

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FhJ1QN9Aig

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 10:48 am
by Coolmanio
Let's remember that different regions don't usually have the same cover art, so if the German one is indeed that (which I highly doubt it will be), there is still a good chance that we will have a different cover art.

Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:57 pm
by jpanimation
miniroll32 wrote:In my opinion, I think they'll retain the original look of the scenes without zooming simply because the Diamond Edition line is supposed to be 'the best of the best' in terms of restoration and original presentation. Either way, during the restoration Lowry will have been able to look at the scenes in lots of detail :)
Well, just imagine how terrible that scene will look if they keep it zoomed in. With the sheer amount of DNR they apply, with the added clarity of HD, that will be one blurry image.