Re: The Lion King (Live-Action)
Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:20 pm
Well, John Musker isn't at Disney anymore. That's probably why he can say things like that.JeanGreyForever wrote:I'm glad we have someone in Disney criticizing the film.
Well, John Musker isn't at Disney anymore. That's probably why he can say things like that.JeanGreyForever wrote:I'm glad we have someone in Disney criticizing the film.
Yes, that's true, I'm glad he can speak openly now.D82 wrote:Well, John Musker isn't at Disney anymore. That's probably why he can say things like that.JeanGreyForever wrote:I'm glad we have someone in Disney criticizing the film.
Source: https://www.comingsoon.net/movies/featu ... -lion-king“It’s a curious thing to see it, I didn’t have a problem with it,” Sanders said. “I think that I follow the camp of ‘I would’ve definitely pushed those designs a little harder.’ That’s a taste thing. I think for me, there was a same/same thing, especially when it came to Scar. But that’s a threshold they would’ve had to have crossed and stayed on the other side of. That was a choice obviously they must’ve had a conversation about early on, how stylized will we be? Do we want to be hyper-real and be very controlled in the proportions of the characters? Or do we want to go a little bit further? I think people do a CG version of the characters that did cross that line, and I thought it was very exciting. But again, nothing major here to say about how they did it, simply a choice. I thought one of the things I was curious about was how closely they adhered to the staging and cutting of the original, particularly the opening, which I was stunned to see was pretty much shot for shot verbatim, which I’m sure must’ve streamlined what they did.”
Source: https://www.polygon.com/features/226754 ... an-deblois“Lion King was an interesting thing, because they didn’t try to reinvent it. Almost a shot-for-shot remake. We worked so hard in that film. The film was perfect. I think it was exactly the film that it was supposed to be,” says Sanders. “So in some ways, you are happy that they did this shot-for-shot remake because it wasn’t the wrong film. On the other hand, when it’s a shot for shot remake ... It’s weird. It’s weird when you see it celebrated when it was all worked out ahead of time.”
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B98c2ZkWT9YChris Sanders wrote:When I heard they were doing a remake, the first thought in my head was "We did it right the first time." There's a frustrating aspect to this because we did it right the first time, so there is no need to redo it, right? So that's frustrating, but then on top of it, the finished film was almost shot-for-shot the movie that we made. So, the weird thing is rather than being upset by that, I suddenly was on the opposite side going "I'm glad they copied it because we got it right the first time."
Source: https://metro.co.uk/2020/08/19/sir-tim- ... -13149895/The pair were invited back to contribute to the 2019 computer animated remake, but in the end, just one new song made the cut, despite Sir Tim writing two especially for the movie. "To be honest, I should have, in a way, got more involved in that film," the 75-year-old told Metro.co.uk. "I assumed rather stupidly that they would be keen to make the most of the material they already had. But they had so many commitments, they had other artists wanting to get their songs in. I think they should have probably got me and Elton to write some stuff first. I rather liked the reflective ballad Light of the World. It’s one of those songs that really grows on you. I can see why they thought 'oh, this is too serious and too heavy'."
So Light of the World didn’t see the light of day, while their other offering Never Too Late made it into the film – albeit barely. "It should have been just laid down in the film somewhere, only maybe a minute of it, and then the whole thing would have been heard at the end of the film. But as it was, Never Too Late – which I think is a great song – is not in the film. At the end of the film you think, well, here’s a nice song by Elton – so what? Those lyrics are strongly related to the story, but you wouldn’t know it. I think we were very low on the food chain in that one. Whereas on the first film, we were involved right from day one, and it was very fun creating the songs, which really did well and they were very much part of the film being a success."
"I hope it comes over that I wasn’t 100% happy with the music in the film, but on the other hand, I don’t want it to come over as ungrateful or pissed off. Elton, I don’t think was too happy, to put it mildly, but luckily he had a really good song in another film at the same time that he won the Oscar for and I was delighted for him. It would have been nice to be nominated again, because I thought the song was quite a nice song, but it was only in the end credits and looked like it was just something stuck in."
"With The Lion King, I think I should have come in and said, 'hey, look, think about the music, mate!' The music was the last thing that people thought about in a way, and I think it suffered slightly."
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe8ynqoyHnETim Rice wrote:I didn't think the so-called live-action version worked as well as the cartoon, partly because it's extremely difficult to make animals have expressions, even though the whole thing was constructed and in a way a sort of cartoon itself. But to make real-looking animals have expressions was almost impossible and a lot of humor seemed to go from the film, I felt.
True. Still, I can just imagine Beyonce and Glover on those two songs even if the movie itself sucks. It's a shame.rodrigo_ca wrote:I was hoping this would use songs from the Broadway show as well, but as it is, I'm almost glad it didn't. Those songs remain (especially the ones you mentioned, Endless Night and Shadowland) as the best ones ever written for The Lion King in my opinion, and I'm glad they're not attached to the almost soulless project that was delivered. Maybe someday we can get something like Black is King but with the Broadway songs (ok, we know it's never going to happen)
Source: https://the-talks.com/interview/andreas-deja/Q: On the other hand, too much realism can also be detrimental. Watching the new CGI-based Lion King film, I really missed the very expressive faces that the hand-drawn process gave us in the original.
Andreas Deja: I had the same reaction. I didn't see the whole film, but I saw all the trailers and clips. It almost looks like National Geographic footage or something. You cannot have the human range that we had in our drawings because then it would ruin the realism. So, they’re a bit trapped by their own rules in that sense.
Good riddance, false king. The real king of animation has taken your place. You're out. Fired.Sotiris wrote: ↑Thu Sep 05, 2024 2:04 pm The king has fallen.
‘Inside Out 2’ Surpasses ‘The Lion King’ Remake, Becomes Highest-Grossing Animated Feature Of All Time
https://www.cartoonbrew.com/box-office- ... 42814.html