Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 9:23 am
ARRRRRRRRGGGG!!!
No news?????
No news?????
DVDizzy Forum
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
The Little Mermaid III Discussion
Page 34 of 59
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 4:29 pm
Has this or has this not been canceled? I apologize for my ignorant question.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:47 pm
it hasn't been cancelled, and here's how i know.
a couple years ago they released a special edition of dumbo, and it had on it a preview of dumbo II
and then when dII was cancelled the next year, they had to re-release a new version of dumbo without the preview for legal reasons
since the little mermaid PE not only contains but is advertised as having a preview of the little mermaid 3
they would need to do the same thing
which would be such an expense and throw away all the success that TLM PE has had
so, that, if no other reason, is why it's definately still on. when we recieve a cheesey "Under the Sea" reissue of TLM or some such thing, then we'll know it's cancelled.
a couple years ago they released a special edition of dumbo, and it had on it a preview of dumbo II
and then when dII was cancelled the next year, they had to re-release a new version of dumbo without the preview for legal reasons
since the little mermaid PE not only contains but is advertised as having a preview of the little mermaid 3
they would need to do the same thing
which would be such an expense and throw away all the success that TLM PE has had
so, that, if no other reason, is why it's definately still on. when we recieve a cheesey "Under the Sea" reissue of TLM or some such thing, then we'll know it's cancelled.
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:34 pm
Wow, really?Fantasmic wrote:it hasn't been cancelled, and here's how i know.
a couple years ago they released a special edition of dumbo, and it had on it a preview of dumbo II
and then when dII was cancelled the next year, they had to re-release a new version of dumbo without the preview for legal reasons
since the little mermaid PE not only contains but is advertised as having a preview of the little mermaid 3
they would need to do the same thing
which would be such an expense and throw away all the success that TLM PE has had
so, that, if no other reason, is why it's definately still on. when we recieve a cheesey "Under the Sea" reissue of TLM or some such thing, then we'll know it's cancelled.
I didn't know that there was a preview for Dumbo 2!!! Does anyone have it?
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:38 pm
Plus, did we already hear earlier that The Little Mermaid III would be the last of the direct to video (DVD) Disney sequels? So, I doubt they would say that, and then turn around and cancel it.
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:10 am
I dedicate this to Disney:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNyRU0fKHAY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNyRU0fKHAY
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:48 am
Agreed,when Disney will finaly tell us something about this movie?.Aladdin from Agrabah wrote:I dedicate this to Disney:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNyRU0fKHAY
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 4:21 am
It seems that there will be no trailer for this movie on The Jungle Book DVD as previously reported.
Disney had better be making this film darn good to make it worth our wait!
Disney had better be making this film darn good to make it worth our wait!
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 5:56 am
Yeah,i"ll kill them if all this waiting is for nothing.atlanticaunderthesea wrote:It seems that there will be no trailer for this movie on The Jungle Book DVD as previously reported.
Disney had better be making this film darn good to make it worth our wait!
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:04 am
What do you mean?
Surely you don't think they would delete the whole thing? Not after Jodi Benson saying they "had just done a Mermaid III album, and a Mermaid III movie . . .", implying that they had compleated it. Well, at least voice work.
Remember Disney Duster said they had done a test screening and the audience loved it so much, they went back to add in more scenes to make it longer?
Having said that, Disney has shelved a movie before, when it was heavily into production; Peter Pan II, with Katheryn Beaumont reprising the role of Wendy. They scrapped the idea, and changed the whole movie, after she had finished all her dialogue and there had been rough animation compleated.
DISNEY CANT DO THIS TO ALL THEIR LITTLE MERMAID FANS WHO HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS MOVIE FOR WHAT SEEMS LIKE YEARS !
Surely you don't think they would delete the whole thing? Not after Jodi Benson saying they "had just done a Mermaid III album, and a Mermaid III movie . . .", implying that they had compleated it. Well, at least voice work.
Remember Disney Duster said they had done a test screening and the audience loved it so much, they went back to add in more scenes to make it longer?
Having said that, Disney has shelved a movie before, when it was heavily into production; Peter Pan II, with Katheryn Beaumont reprising the role of Wendy. They scrapped the idea, and changed the whole movie, after she had finished all her dialogue and there had been rough animation compleated.
DISNEY CANT DO THIS TO ALL THEIR LITTLE MERMAID FANS WHO HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS MOVIE FOR WHAT SEEMS LIKE YEARS !
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:10 am
No,i don't think they'll delete it,i mean they might make a cheap sequle after all of this.atlanticaunderthesea wrote:What do you mean?
Surely you don't think they would delete the whole thing? Not after Jodi Benson saying they "had just done a Mermaid III album, and a Mermaid III movie . . .", implying that they had compleated it. Well, at least voice work.
Remember Disney Duster said they had done a test screening and the audience loved it so much, they went back to add in more scenes to make it longer?
Having said that, Disney has shelved a movie before, when it was heavily into production; Peter Pan II, with Katheryn Beaumont reprising the role of Wendy. They scrapped the idea, and changed the whole movie, after she had finished all her dialogue and there had been rough animation compleated.
DISNEY CANT DO THIS TO ALL THEIR LITTLE MERMAID FANS WHO HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS MOVIE FOR WHAT SEEMS LIKE YEARS !
I didn't know about the deleted version of Peter Pan II
can you tell me more? 
.Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:21 am
I got the info from the interview that Animated Views did with Mrs. Beaumont.
AV: Were you contacted about reprising your role as Wendy for the Peter Pan sequel, Return to Never-Land?
KB: Oh yeah, we did the whole film – we recorded it. But they made different decisions after the film was completely recorded. They had - I don’t know what problems. But you know how sometimes when films are made, they look at the way it is at that time and decide they want to make changes, or they’re not sure if certain things are going to work, and they completely redo. That’s what happened with this film. They just dropped everything, including most of the voices. I think they changed most of the voices, including mine. So that was the way it went.
There is also this as well:
As the voice of Wendy in Walt Disney's Peter Pan, Kathryn Beaumont likewise recorded all of Wendy's dialogue for Return to Never Land. However, for unknown reasons, the role of Wendy in Never Land was later recast with Kathie Soucie.
I always thought that was really interesting. . .
AV: Were you contacted about reprising your role as Wendy for the Peter Pan sequel, Return to Never-Land?
KB: Oh yeah, we did the whole film – we recorded it. But they made different decisions after the film was completely recorded. They had - I don’t know what problems. But you know how sometimes when films are made, they look at the way it is at that time and decide they want to make changes, or they’re not sure if certain things are going to work, and they completely redo. That’s what happened with this film. They just dropped everything, including most of the voices. I think they changed most of the voices, including mine. So that was the way it went.
There is also this as well:
As the voice of Wendy in Walt Disney's Peter Pan, Kathryn Beaumont likewise recorded all of Wendy's dialogue for Return to Never Land. However, for unknown reasons, the role of Wendy in Never Land was later recast with Kathie Soucie.
I always thought that was really interesting. . .
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:35 am
It is intersting,sounds like Wendy was suposed to be a child again in Peter Pan II.atlanticaunderthesea wrote:I got the info from the interview that Animated Views did with Mrs. Beaumont.
AV: Were you contacted about reprising your role as Wendy for the Peter Pan sequel, Return to Never-Land?
KB: Oh yeah, we did the whole film – we recorded it. But they made different decisions after the film was completely recorded. They had - I don’t know what problems. But you know how sometimes when films are made, they look at the way it is at that time and decide they want to make changes, or they’re not sure if certain things are going to work, and they completely redo. That’s what happened with this film. They just dropped everything, including most of the voices. I think they changed most of the voices, including mine. So that was the way it went.
There is also this as well:
As the voice of Wendy in Walt Disney's Peter Pan, Kathryn Beaumont likewise recorded all of Wendy's dialogue for Return to Never Land. However, for unknown reasons, the role of Wendy in Never Land was later recast with Kathie Soucie.
I always thought that was really interesting. . .
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:38 am
Really? I didnt think so; I just presumed that she would be doing the voice work for Wendy as a mother.
I still cant understand why they took her off the film. It makes perfect sense to have her in it!
I still cant understand why they took her off the film. It makes perfect sense to have her in it!
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:43 am
Well,becouse as a child is different then as a grown up,so they changed the voice and that why i think she's was a child in that deleted version.atlanticaunderthesea wrote:Really? I didnt think so; I just presumed that she would be doing the voice work for Wendy as a mother.
I still cant understand why they took her off the film. It makes perfect sense to have her in it!
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:46 am
Oh right, I see what you mean! 
That woudl have been an amzing extra on the DVD, showing the scrapped film, but did they include it? NO ! They had to make space for a zillion set top games
That woudl have been an amzing extra on the DVD, showing the scrapped film, but did they include it? NO ! They had to make space for a zillion set top games
Posted: Fri Sep 28, 2007 6:59 am
Yay!atlanticaunderthesea wrote:Oh right, I see what you mean!
That woudl have been an amzing extra on the DVD, showing the scrapped film, but did they include it? NO ! They had to make space for a zillion set top games
.Yeah,they could do that insted of making million games
.(i think there's just deleted sence about Hook finds out that he didn't kidnappt Wendy and TinkerBell gets a flower and i'ts poisen or something.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:03 am
Can't wait for another 2 years until "The Little Mermaid 3" comes out on DVD.Old Fish Tale wrote:The studio will also complete Little Mermaid III, due on DVD in 2009.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:05 am
Where the heck did 2009 come from ?!?!?!?!?!??!
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 8:55 am
Wow,thank you Disney,we can't wait to the movie and you delay it,thanks a lotOld Fish Tale wrote:The studio will also complete Little Mermaid III, due on DVD in 2009.
.