Posted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 12:31 pm
LOL, so true Escapay!
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
I looked at this while I was out DVD shopping today. The box says that it's a 2-disc edition on the front, but there is nothing on the back to indicate such. The only extras listed were a featurette, music video, and some games. I thought maybe it was offered in two aspect ratios, but that is also not the case. It's apparently either a misprint on the front, or just unnecessarily streched over two discs to boost sales.my chicken is infected wrote:I looked for that on Amazon, and they said it only has one disc. But it is a new reissue with some bonuses, albeit probably lame ones. And it's in widescreen, and anamorphically enhanced.xxhplinkxx wrote:a new 2 disc edition of The Pebble and the Penguin
I can't see why it'd get a 2-Disc release. I've seen the movie's box office gross on IMDB. Pretty abysmal. It's not one of Don's most popular movies, and I doubt there's enough material for two discs.
I think I have a good explanation for why I don't like that but its complicated.Escapay wrote:Except for the "rubbish" ending of Anastasia.bradhig wrote:Most of his stuff doesn't interest me much.
Escapay
That's because it's only in its OAR, whereas the old DVD had the OAR and the hackjob P&S version as well.bradhig wrote:I don't like the Aspect Ratio on the Anastasia two disc set its smaller then the original dvd and I have both.
I always thought it was Richard Williams that was the animation perfectionist? If you ever saw the uncut Theif and the Cobler on youtube then you'll know what I'm talking about.Siren wrote:About the hate towards Bluth....Bluth was strongly involved in movies like Rescuerers and Fox and the Hound and look how good they were. As far as I'm concerned, they were as much of Bluth movies as they were Disney movies. Like Disney, he had a great eye for really making the audience feel for orphans. And he focuses on details. An American Tail's artwork is as stunning as any Disney movie out there. As is Secret of NIMH and Land Before Time. He isn't a Disney-wanna-be, he was a major hitter in Disney animation for years before he quit because he didn't like how they got so cheap. He loves details. He has no problem spending days on one scene. Look at the Great Owl scene in NIMH, that took months to complete, because like Walt Disney, he was a perfectionist. And when the heads at Disney told him, "don't bother to color in the eyes" for the movie Rescuers, because it would save Disney money, he quickly started getting sick of it. They cut corners to save money and Disney suffered, till they finally brought back the Disney tradition of detailed animation and stories with Little Mermaid. While Bluth has never wavered from his attention to detail. He struggles to make movies now. Because he rather struggle to make it so it perfect, then do it cheap and fast and sloppy.
And box officer scores mean jack. A lot of Disney classics did very poorly in the theaters too. Fantasia was a box office bomb and yet it is scene as a work of art now
And look at just how much image is lost if you watch the film in pan & scan...bradhig wrote:okay here is the original dvd
http://www.sfstlskyway.com/originalanastasia.jpg
and the special edtion
http://www.sfstlskyway.com/seanastasia.jpg

Which makes me dislike Bluth even MORE so.Siren wrote:About the hate towards Bluth....Bluth was strongly involved in movies like Rescuerers and Fox and the Hound and look how good they were.
You're kidding right?They cut corners to save money and Disney suffered, till they finally brought back the Disney tradition of detailed animation and stories with Little Mermaid.
Disney and Bluth are far from the only animation perfectionists. Miyazaki comes to mind as well.Super Aurora wrote:I always thought it was Richard Williams that was the animation perfectionist? If you ever saw the uncut Theif and the Cobler on youtube then you'll know what I'm talking about.Siren wrote:About the hate towards Bluth....Bluth was strongly involved in movies like Rescuerers and Fox and the Hound and look how good they were. As far as I'm concerned, they were as much of Bluth movies as they were Disney movies. Like Disney, he had a great eye for really making the audience feel for orphans. And he focuses on details. An American Tail's artwork is as stunning as any Disney movie out there. As is Secret of NIMH and Land Before Time. He isn't a Disney-wanna-be, he was a major hitter in Disney animation for years before he quit because he didn't like how they got so cheap. He loves details. He has no problem spending days on one scene. Look at the Great Owl scene in NIMH, that took months to complete, because like Walt Disney, he was a perfectionist. And when the heads at Disney told him, "don't bother to color in the eyes" for the movie Rescuers, because it would save Disney money, he quickly started getting sick of it. They cut corners to save money and Disney suffered, till they finally brought back the Disney tradition of detailed animation and stories with Little Mermaid. While Bluth has never wavered from his attention to detail. He struggles to make movies now. Because he rather struggle to make it so it perfect, then do it cheap and fast and sloppy.
And box officer scores mean jack. A lot of Disney classics did very poorly in the theaters too. Fantasia was a box office bomb and yet it is scene as a work of art now
*through gritted teeth*bradhig wrote:The only thing I would hate him is the messed plot of Anastasia.
I'm pissed at the makers of Anastasia for not making the ending suck enough. Would've been cooler to see Anastasia start seducing Rasputin and they decide to take over Russia and rule as tyrants...Siren wrote:Are you sure you understand the magnitude of Anastasia's sucky ending Escapay? I mean, are you REALLY sure?