Disney's Divinity wrote:MT and MMM are actually the best of the shorts films, imo (along with F&FF). Sort of tragic they were the last released like this, but better late than never, right?

I expect they are so late to blu-ray owing to how difficult it must be to market them. At least with
F&FF and
Ichabod you can play around with Mickey and well ... Ichabod.

With the Latin American films, you can use their "South of the Border" setting as a selling point.
But poor
MMM and
MT have no overarching theme to tie all the "shorts" together (well, besides music). There isn't even a Deems Taylor-like figure in between each segment à la
Fantasia, to help make at least some tenuous links between segments. So how do you sell them on home video? I guess the only reason they got a DVD release in 2000 was because it seems Disney back then was happy giving even incredibly obscure films in their catalogue wide releases. It's a different situation these days, of course. (Which is also why I'll probably have to sell both my kidneys on the black market to import these to Malta.

)
Still, I very much appreciate these films and what the animators were trying to achieve, even if the results weren't always necessarily great, or even good. I do consider certain segments in these films as "experimental", and being experimental means that one has to expect that certain audiences will not take to them easily. Years and years and years ago (

) before I got the films on DVD, and would read UD's reviews religiously, I was not expecting much from both movies. I recall the UD review describing
Blame it on the Samba as utterly pointless, being about "Latin dancing and nothing more".
I was truly expecting some unimaginative piece of tripe with just Donald and José bobbing around to the music. What I saw instead left me grinning from ear to ear, my toes tapping, my eyes dancing. Sure, there is no real point to it, but there doesn't have to be. It exists solely to stimulate the senses, and that is a perfectly valid reason for its existence!
Even it that makes the segment sound uninteresting, I have to say that it is executed wonderfully. Beautiful art direction, kinetic character animation, dazzling effects animation, and very amusing use of the live-action Ethel Smith on the organ!

Considering these films were made at a probable fraction of the budget afforded to something like
Fantasia, I have to say that the disparity in resources behind the scenes isn't as visible onscreen as you'd imagine it would be.
Frankly, you forget that at this point the Disney studio was barely even using their previously-much celebrated multiplane camera, because planning out sequences for it and executing them was so expensive! (If you pay attention you'll notice that even the single-narrative features of the 1950s, with the exception of
Sleeping Beauty, are highly austere productions, at least in comparison to
Snow White, Pinocchio, Fantasia and
Bambi. Special effects and niceties were kept to a minimum, and multiplane shots were barely perceptible, if not inexistent!)
One more thing. Generally speaking I think the musical arrangements in
MMM and
MT are lovely too, and make for a perfect marriage with the animation. I don't care if the music is "dated." It is of its time, and I enjoy it nonetheless.
Disclaimer: I am a musician, so perhaps that helps.
