Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:03 am
What in the hell. How do you not know Perry the Platypus?? He's Perry the Platypus!!
Thanks! I've never seen Phineas and Ferb.Super Aurora wrote:He's from the tv show phineas and ferb. And it's not a duck. It's suppose to be a platypus.Will Barks wrote:Where's that blue duck with the hat from? Never seen this character before.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Mv6yKNkdNxU" frameborder="0"></iframe>Will Barks wrote:Thanks! I've never seen Phineas and Ferb.Super Aurora wrote: He's from the tv show phineas and ferb. And it's not a duck. It's suppose to be a platypus.
Neither have I. lol. I just knew this info.Will Barks wrote:Thanks! I've never seen Phineas and Ferb.Super Aurora wrote: He's from the tv show phineas and ferb. And it's not a duck. It's suppose to be a platypus.
I've heard of that show but have never watched it.Avaitor wrote:The best? Nah, Gravity Falls smears P&F into the ground tenfold.
Indeed. From what Ive seen F&F is awful. The Dorito head in particular infuriates me just from a design perspective.Avaitor wrote:The best? Nah, Gravity Falls smears P&F into the ground tenfold.
Kyle wrote:The Dorito head in particular infuriates me just from a design perspective.
SWillie! wrote:Kyle wrote:The Dorito head in particular infuriates me just from a design perspective.Phineas' design is genius. He's immediately identifiable in silhouette from any angle. Just because it strays from realism doesn't mean it's bad.
Im all for strong silhouettes, we need more of em in animation these days. But one of the easiest ways to loose appeal if you ask me is to use too many harsh angles and straight lines, and a flat triangle that cant even convincingly rotate around just ain't my idea of a good design. Its not really about realism, the characters in Hey Arnold for example have all sorts of crazy shapes, but at least they look organic enough to exist in dimensional space. The show looks unintentionally flat. Flat on propose can work (like a lot of UPA shorts) but here it just feels like its a time saver.SWillie! wrote:Phineas' design is genius. He's immediately identifiable in silhouette from any angle. Just because it strays from realism doesn't mean it's bad.
Walt Disney Co has pushed back the launch date of its new video game and toy initiative known as "Infinity" to August from June, saying it was seeking to capitalize on a more favorable retail season.
The new launch date will be August 18, John Pleasants, co-president of Disney Interactive, said in a statement.
But the new date will also mean that the division will only be able to profit from the new offering in the fourth quarter instead of the third. The division made a loss in the last year although it returned to a small profit in the latest quarter.
Pleasants told the New York Times that the shift in the launch date would definitely impact the division's goal of achieving profitability for the year but would also allow it to add more bells and whistles.
A starter pack with software, the board and three plastic figurines is priced at $75.
It hasn't been confirmed, but there's evidence for Anna and Elsa later this year. As for earlier princess, nothing yet - but I'm sure they're coming.bradhig wrote:Any princesses besides Rapunzel?
If there's one thing Disney Loves to promote, it's its Princesses so yeah it will come. Probably Merida also. I'm thinking maybe Ariel later this fall since the Blu Ray is coming though I'm not going to try to predict the unpredictable Disney Marketing of the 21st Century's Logic since not a lot existsSWillie! wrote:It hasn't been confirmed, but there's evidence for Anna and Elsa later this year. As for earlier princess, nothing yet - but I'm sure they're coming.bradhig wrote:Any princesses besides Rapunzel?