DVDizzy Forum

Madagascar probably would not have made it in even if it were really amazing, simply due to the fact that sequels have a tough time making the cut.

The only one I haven't seen yet is Frankenweenie.

So far this year has been adequate, nothings been totally bad and most of them are solid to good, but I can only think of one film that is truly great. It's sad that Arietty doesn't qualify, but even if could, it's not Ghibli's best, but it is one of the better films of the year.

For me "Paranorman" is the best of the year so far and I genuinely think even in a great year this would be a strong contender.

As for the top 5 I would go with
Paranorman
Brave
The Lorax
Pirates
Hotel

However, the last 4 are very loosly placed. Hopefully Ralph and Gaurdian will change it. I wouldn't mind a couple foreign movies entering the list.

Pokeholic_Prince wrote:The only one I haven't seen yet is Frankenweenie.

So far this year has been adequate, nothings been totally bad and most of them are solid to good, but I can only think of one film that is truly great. It's sad that Arietty doesn't qualify, but even if could, it's not Ghibli's best, but it is one of the better films of the year.

For me "Paranorman" is the best of the year so far and I genuinely think even in a great year this would be a strong contender.

As for the top 5 I would go with
Paranorman
Brave
The Lorax
Pirates
Hotel

However, the last 4 are very loosly placed. Hopefully Ralph and Gaurdian will change it. I wouldn't mind a couple foreign movies entering the list.

Arrietty had no business being nominated 2 years after it was first released. I am a stickler for this, though, always been annoyed that they follow US release dates instead of original release dates for foreign movies.

Rise of the Guardians has won yet another award.

http://www.examiner.com/article/hollywo ... mated-film

I am getting a little sick of this, especially since the movie hasn't been released yet. I would really like to know the details of the selection process.

qindarka wrote:Rise of the Guardians has won yet another award.

http://www.examiner.com/article/hollywo ... mated-film

I am getting a little sick of this, especially since the movie hasn't been released yet. I would really like to know the details of the selection process.

Sounds like there is no selection process. They just paid some money and got an award. Ta-daaa.

I've never even heard of all these awards. The critics awards are the ones that count and I'm pretty sure Paranorman, Wreck-it Ralph and Frankenweenie are gonna clean up those. Guardians only has two reviews out right now and they're both saying it's 'okay'.

But watch Guardians win the Golden Globe because of their campaigning though. The Globes can be bought.

PatrickvD is pretty much spot-on. The Hollywood Movie Awards are pretty much just a publicity machine. I found another article on the awards and Quentin Tarantino pretty much admitted it was bought, since he won Best Screenplay for a movie he's still editing!

By virtue of its mid-October date, the Hollywood Film Awards, run by Carlos de Abreu, have become the mandatory first stop in the awards-season circuit, even if, because of the early spot on the calendar, many of the films and performances being honored have yet to be seen.

“It’s strange to get an award while I’m still in the editing room,” said Quentin Tarantino, who took screenplay honors for his upcoming gonzo western “Django Unchained,” which will be released in theaters Christmas Day. Then again, he added, the honor could prove helpful in winning arguments with his editor. “I'll be able to say, ‘Hey, you want to take a line out of my award-winning screenplay?'"

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/en ... 8130.story

The real critics awards don't start until the National Board of Review and New York Film Critics Circle in early December.

PatrickvD wrote:

qindarka wrote:Rise of the Guardians has won yet another award.

http://www.examiner.com/article/hollywo ... mated-film

I am getting a little sick of this, especially since the movie hasn't been released yet. I would really like to know the details of the selection process.

Sounds like there is no selection process. They just paid some money and got an award. Ta-daaa.

I've never even heard of all these awards. The critics awards are the ones that count and I'm pretty sure Paranorman, Wreck-it Ralph and Frankenweenie are gonna clean up those. Guardians only has two reviews out right now and they're both saying it's 'okay'.

But watch Guardians win the Golden Globe because of their campaigning though. The Globes can be bought.

But that's not fair!!

DisneyJedi wrote:

PatrickvD wrote: Sounds like there is no selection process. They just paid some money and got an award. Ta-daaa.

I've never even heard of all these awards. The critics awards are the ones that count and I'm pretty sure Paranorman, Wreck-it Ralph and Frankenweenie are gonna clean up those. Guardians only has two reviews out right now and they're both saying it's 'okay'.

But watch Guardians win the Golden Globe because of their campaigning though. The Globes can be bought.

But that's not fair!!

Man,this is sounding suspiciously what they do in politics.But replace the campaigners with lobbyists.

And for anyone that would like to see the Rotten Tomatoes User statistics:

<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/brave_2012/">Brave</a>
Liked by 80% (Tomatometer 78%)
Rating 3.9/5 or 7.8/10 (Tomatometer 6.9/10)

<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_lorax/">Dr Seuss' The Lorax</a>
Liked by 66% (Tomatometer 54%)
Rating 3.7/5 or 7.4/10 (Tomatometer 5.9/10)

<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/franken ... nkenWeenie (2012)</a>
Liked by 79% (Tomatometer 88%)
Rating 3.9/5 or 7.8/10 (Tomatometer 7.7/10)

<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/hotel_t ... ia/">Hotel Transylvania</a>
Liked by 75% (Tomatometer 43%)
Rating 3.9/5 or 7.8/10 (Tomatometer 5.3/10)

<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/ice_age ... t_3d/">Ice Age: Continental Drift</a>
Liked by 61% (Tomatometer 38%)
Rating 3.6/5 or 7.2/10 (Tomatometer 5.1/10)

<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/madagas ... Madagascar 3: Europe's Most Wanted</a>
Liked by 78% (Tomatometer 78%)
Rating 4/5 or 8/10 (Tomatometer 6.7/10)

<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/paranor ... aNorman</a>
Liked by 77% (Tomatometer 86%)
Rating 3.9/5 or 7.8/10 (Tomatometer 7.3/10)

<a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_pir ... fits/">The Pirates! Band of Misfits</a>
Liked by 61% (Tomatometer 86%)
Rating 3.5/5 or 7/10 (Tomatometer 7.2/10)

I'm personally glad that they moved the user ratings to the main ratings area, because I'd rather see those ratings. Although, I don't necessarily base whether or not I'll see a movie because of its ratings.

I personally think Howl's Moving Castle is better than Spirited Away, but that just me of course. It's different for every person. Out of the films I've seen, I quite enjoyed Hotel Transylvania and Brave, with Ice Age 4 and The Pirates rated as good.

So, here are the 21 films that have been submitted for Oscar consideration in the Best Animated Feature category:

“Adventures in Zambezia”
“Brave”
“Delhi Safari”
“Dr. Seuss’ The Lorax”
“Frankenweenie”
“From Up on Poppy Hill”
“Hey Krishna”
“Hotel Transylvania”
“Ice Age Continental Drift”
“A Liar’s Autobiography: The Untrue Story of Monty Python’s Graham Chapman”
“Madagascar 3: Europe’s Most Wanted”
“The Mystical Laws”
“The Painting”
“ParaNorman”
“The Pirates! Band of Misfits”
“The Rabbi’s Cat”
“Rise of the Guardians”
“Secret of the Wings”
“Walter & Tandoori’s Christmas”
“Wreck-It Ralph”
“Zarafa”

http://www.oscars.org/press/pressreleas ... 21102.html

I'm so sick of Dreamworks coughing up money to get awards for their movies. It's so annoying and unfair towards those who actually want to be honest towards their projects.

Several of this year’s Oscar contenders discuss their biggest challenges, triumphs, inspirations and the state of animation in a very good year.

Tackling the Big Questions
http://www.animationmagazine.net/people ... questions/

The first For Your Consideration ads from Disney:

All in all this is a fantastic year for Disney animation in general.

Here's is a composite I made of all 21 films in the running this year! Can't believe how many there were to hunt down that I had had yet to see.

Just finished The Rabbi's Cat & thought it was great, about to see Zarafa & I'm excited about that. Going to a screening of Rise of the Guardians next week & I'm stoked! Also going to see The Painting this week during the LA Animation Film festival & I'm so jazzed!

[/img]

Why on earth is From Up on Poppy Hill being nominated for nomination? It was released in Japan in 2011 and hasn't been released in the US yet.

If a film is released in another country the year before and given a qualifying run in Los Angeles this year (which GKIDS plans to do), it's eligible. So, yes, under Academy rules, Up on Poppy Hill is allowed to compete.

estefan wrote:If a film is released in another country the year before and given a qualifying run in Los Angeles this year (which GKIDS plans to do), it's eligible. So, yes, under Academy rules, Up on Poppy Hill is allowed to compete.

I hate these rules. Wish they would just use the initial date of release for consistency.

Well, it's an American awards show. So they go by the American release date, even if it quietly playing for a week at one cinema in LA counts as a release (which was what GKIDS apparently does).

thelittleursula wrote:I'm so sick of Dreamworks coughing up money to get awards for their movies. It's so annoying and unfair towards those who actually want to be honest towards their projects.

I’m surprised nobody responded to this, actually. Replace “Dreamworks” with “Pixar,” and we would’ve had a lynch mob on our hands.

Love Merida's hair in that picture, btw.