Page 4 of 20

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:15 am
by Lnds500
Sotiris wrote:
Lnds500 wrote:I've been looking for the thread with Peter Pan's restoration comparison. Can someone redirect me?
Is this it?
No :(

EDIT: Actually it's the next page :D

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 4:57 am
by 271286
Ok, the colors on the PE looks more dull than I remember...

However I think a lot of the old VHS caps we see have brighter colors than the DVD... I think that might actually be a flaw of the VHS format and not that the restorations have become worse... I think it could be that the VHS format didn't have the same color depth as the formats of today... I don't think can be used as proof of original colors... I'm not just talking about the Peter Pan release but all their titles...

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:05 am
by Lnds500
271286 wrote:Ok, the colors on the PE looks more dull than I remember...

However I think a lot of the old VHS caps we see have brighter colors than the DVD... I think that might actually be a flaw of the VHS format and not that the restorations have become worse... I think it could be that the VHS format didn't have the same color depth as the formats of today... I don't think can be used as proof of original colors... I'm not just talking about the Peter Pan release but all their titles...
I also believe VHS is not a good indicator of how the films "should look". The restorations they could do back then were very limited as well, not using the original film prints etc.

I do, however, take issue and become suspicious when heavy, out-of-the-blue colour alterations happen, like the

Cinderella - Golden bedroom becoming light brown
ImageImage

Aristocats - coat colour change
ImageImage

the bard in Sleeping Beauty etc etc

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:00 pm
by ajmrowland
^yeah I see that as a possible issue. While it doesnt really harm the background, the chair and parts of the floor are altered too much.

edit: actually looking again, the background loses significant depth and contrast by comparison.

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 3:04 am
by Atlantica
So is it easier/cheaper for Disney to do the type of restoring they do?

Posted: Sun Sep 02, 2012 3:12 am
by JustOneBite87
atlanticaunderthesea wrote:So is it easier/cheaper for Disney to do the type of restoring they do?

It's certainly a less intelligent, no-brainer manner of restoration. Not cheaper or correct.

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 2:49 am
by ajmrowland
yeah, as in "using the original prints for reference is a no-brainer".

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 3:55 am
by Atlantica
Eugh.....who knows what planet Disney is on at the moment..... :?

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 4:09 am
by ProfessorRatigan
Eugh.....who knows what planet Disney is on at the moment...
Treasure Planet, maybe? Lame joke, I know. :P

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:51 am
by Atlantica
Haha, very good :lol:

This will indeed be a poop release with no promotion then I guess. Tied in to Secret of the Wings maybe ? Not sure if that has been given a release date yet.

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:53 pm
by miklc
atlanticaunderthesea wrote:This will indeed be a poop release with no promotion then I guess. Tied in to Secret of the Wings maybe ? Not sure if that has been given a release date yet.
I bet your right! Whilst I am very excited to add this much loved classic to my Blu-Ray collection if the latest Disney releases are anything to go buy it will not receive the treatment it deserves

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:58 pm
by ichabod
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Peter-Pan-Blu-r ... 70&sr=1-16

UK release date brought forward to November 5th?

Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:03 pm
by Atlantica
Thank you for the release link.

This really will have no promotion, and will be tied in to the fourth Tink film, much as the first Tink film was to Peter's Platinum.

And it isn't a Diamond either! Depressing.

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:17 am
by Scamander
atlanticaunderthesea wrote:Thank you for the release link.

This really will have no promotion, and will be tied in to the fourth Tink film, much as the first Tink film was to Peter's Platinum.
You mean, much as the first Tink film was supposed to be tied in with the Peter Pan Platinum Edition. ;)

Regarding the Diamond Edition, I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest, if The Little Mermaid turns out to be the only remaining release.

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:42 pm
by thelittleursula
^ Yup and the sequel and prequel will be paired together; plus a undersea themed collection set for everything to go in it.

Aladdin will also get the snob and just be a lousy " here's the movie I guess.... "

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 11:03 pm
by JustOneBite87
I imagine a deciding factor in removing Peter Pan from the Diamond Edition line-up was a lack of desire on Disney's part to produce new bonus features.

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 am
by Atlantica
JustOneBite87 wrote:I imagine a deciding factor in removing Peter Pan from the Diamond Edition line-up was a lack of desire on Disney's part to produce new bonus features.
Is it being billed as anything at all ? Or a 'Special Edition' ?

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:09 pm
by jrboy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 4:12 pm
by PatrickvD
Interesting

Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:50 pm
by Sotiris
The cover art for the UK release is out. It's the same as the German one. :(