Page 4 of 45

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:54 pm
by Flanger-Hanger
Disneykid wrote:Luke has posted revised cover art on the front page. I think it's a big improvement. Cinderella and Tremaine don't seem nearly as squashed together, the Prince is given an action pose (which confirms what the filmmakers said about him actually doing something in this), and the dark red background makes it appropriately more sinister. Since the original had a blue cover and this has red, I'm assuming the inevitable re-release of Dreams Come True will be predominately green (for puking...how convenient.)
I was thinking the same thing about cover art. They don't need to make it green for me to puke, all they need to do is mention the title :P

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:08 pm
by Dottie
Wow!! I didn't think the cover-art could become worse than it already was!!!
But BV was able to do it!!! They should make Cinderella II now yellow, then Cinderella III red and keep the PE blue to get the 3 primar colors! :lol:
And then make a puking green box!!!!!

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:23 pm
by goofystitch
I think the new cover art is MUCH better. Cinderella isn't so HUGE and it works better with Lady Tremain on the right. My only problem with it is that Prince Charming looks a little bit menacing.

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:10 pm
by lord-of-sith
I also think the new cover is an improvement. Lady Tremain seems a lot more, what's the word I'm looking for? Proportionate? When she was squished over to the side, her hand looked really long and her face did too.

Also, the red background does make it look for hellish and menacing. I also like the inclusion of the prince in his "action pose"

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 4:22 pm
by Simba3
I agree, I think the new cover art is definately an improvement over the last one.

The Revised Cinderella III Cover

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 6:00 pm
by Disney Duster
Yes, I'd say it is an improvement for the most part. I actually like how the Prince looks angry. He is losing his bride to someone he doesnt' love (and, yes, I'll say it, isn't so hot). Even his horse looks angry. How awesome. My only problem is Cinderella. Her hair is really bad, and her pose is the same as a very often used stock image of her. It was the one used on Disc 1 of the Cinderella DVD.

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:16 pm
by MickeyMousePal
Now Cinderella 3 artwork looks better but it could still have another revised cover...

I kind of still don't like the artwork come on even Cinderella 2 artwork looks better. :o

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 9:29 pm
by disneystarsfan
a much better background, i love the darkness in the red because it goes along with the feel of thestory and cinderella looks like like's she's supposed to. i'm glad her and the step-mother look closer to equal size. i also like how they expanded the cover a little bit by moving the prince to the other side of the cover. i think they should stick to that new cover but fix the step-mother's face like it supposed to look like.

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:06 pm
by DisneyRoyalty
Much better improvement! But I still don't think Cinderella and Tremaine look right. I mean where they are on the cover is fine, but their faces look off to me. But I like how the step mother has the wand with the magic going to the slipper on Anastasia's foot, it all shows up much nicer on the red background.

So the Prince is getting more of a role in this movie? Good! I never liked how uncharacterized he was. I wonder if they'll call him Prince Charming? Like actually say it. Or at least give him a real name!

Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 10:52 pm
by Ting Ting
I much prefer the new cover art to the old. A change for the better, IMO.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:12 am
by Super Aurora
DisneyRoyalty wrote:Much better improvement! But I still don't think Cinderella and Tremaine look right. I mean where they are on the cover is fine, but their faces look off to me. But I like how the step mother has the wand with the magic going to the slipper on Anastasia's foot, it all shows up much nicer on the red background.

So the Prince is getting more of a role in this movie? Good! I never liked how uncharacterized he was. I wonder if they'll call him Prince Charming? Like actually say it. Or at least give him a real name!
Didn't Disney officially named him that?

Anyway, Yea the cover is an improvement. And the Prince even wearing a new outfit. Let's hope His rescue isn't akin to Philip's in Sleeping Beauty....

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 1:57 pm
by cup_cake_05
I don't know how a Cinderella 3 will turn out. I didn't really care too much for the second one. I believe that it drug out too long, it just wasn't as interesing as the first.

Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 2:01 pm
by Flanger-Hanger
Super Aurora wrote:
DisneyRoyalty wrote:Much better improvement! But I still don't think Cinderella and Tremaine look right. I mean where they are on the cover is fine, but their faces look off to me. But I like how the step mother has the wand with the magic going to the slipper on Anastasia's foot, it all shows up much nicer on the red background.

So the Prince is getting more of a role in this movie? Good! I never liked how uncharacterized he was. I wonder if they'll call him Prince Charming? Like actually say it. Or at least give him a real name!
Didn't Disney officially named him that?


Yes they did Occording to the Encyclopedia of Walt Disney's Animated Characters. The only real prince names are Eric and Phillip

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:30 pm
by disneystarsfan
i'm hoping that along with this release, cinderella II will be re-released even though its probably unlikely. my collection wouldn't be complete if i only have cindy 1 and 3 :shock:

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:47 pm
by Super Aurora
disneystarsfan wrote:i'm hoping that along with this release, cinderella II will be re-released even though its probably unlikely. my collection wouldn't be complete if i only have cindy 1 and 3 :shock:
Actually it would. Cinderella II never did exist.

Posted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:56 pm
by Josh
WOW! :D :o :D :o I just stopped by this conversation because I was bored and there's a new cover art!!! I love it when you read there is new cover-art, and there is that 30-45 seconds where you are trying to find it, imagining what it's going to look like, I get so excited :P I know...it's sad.
I don't really like the new cover, the colors black, yellow and red just don't work, especially considering it's Cinderella...Cinderella= Blue, Blue, Blue! I hope Australia gets the old C3 cover, and a new release of Cinderella 2...I don't like our Cinderella 2 cover.
Image

Cinderella III: Rated PG?

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:55 am
by Disney Duster
If this is true...WOAH. I found this on Wikipedia's Cinderella III article:
The MPAA originally gave the film a PG rating, due to some violence scenes, but most were cut and the final film was given a G rating.
:o So maybe Lucifer finally ate one of the mice.

Re: Cinderella III: Rated PG?

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 11:11 am
by Disneykid
Disney Duster wrote:If this is true...WOAH. I found this on Wikipedia's Cinderella III article:
The MPAA originally gave the film a PG rating, due to some violence scenes, but most were cut and the final film was given a G rating.
:o So maybe Lucifer finally ate one of the mice.
Either that or Prince Charming gets to kick some serious butt. Just exactly whose butt remains to be seen, though. Perhaps Tremaine casts a spell on the guards, and we get a Sleeping Beauty-esque climax.

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:37 pm
by w00t
I would pick this up but I am still waiting to get the first and second

Re: Cinderella III: Rated PG?

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:47 pm
by xxhplinkxx
Disney Duster wrote:If this is true...WOAH. I found this on Wikipedia's Cinderella III article:
The MPAA originally gave the film a PG rating, due to some violence scenes, but most were cut and the final film was given a G rating.
:o So maybe Lucifer finally ate one of the mice.
OH!!! I hope we get to see the deleted/alternate scenes!!!!