Page 4 of 4
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 3:40 pm
by Isidour
maybe they did that just so they could go to another country,so they wouldn`t have to make bigger contracts that the one you could do in India, China or Corea, besides it will be cheaper
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 3:47 pm
by Lars Vermundsberget
From a certain business point-of-view there's no doubt that could make sense...
Posted: Wed May 17, 2006 8:37 pm
by Isidour
on the other hand, maybe they just like to travel to foreign countries

Shrek in 2-D
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 7:04 pm
by Owlzindabarn
In conclusion, I would like to add that 2-D animation will never return completely, not even if they thaw out old Walt Disney himself and put him back to work. Thank you, and good night!
Re: Shrek in 2-D
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 7:10 pm
by Escapay
Owlzindabarn wrote:In conclusion, I would like to add that 2-D animation will never return completely, not even if they thaw out old Walt Disney himself and put him back to work. Thank you, and good night!
Kind of hard to thaw out ashes
Escapay
Re: Shrek in 2-D
Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:09 pm
by Zoltack
Escapay wrote:Kind of hard to thaw out ashes

You can do it, all you need is a big enough hammer and a flamethrower.

Posted: Sat May 20, 2006 8:36 pm
by Isidour
can we use the "Bambi 2 official Flamethrower with new stickers and extra load"?

Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 9:27 am
by Aladdin from Agrabah
What a macabre discussion!
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 10:44 am
by Escapay
Aladdin from Agrabah wrote:What a macabre discussion!
I know, isn't it fun?
You know, Zoltack, I can always build another time machine, and we can go back to 1995 and make Toy Story a flop so that no one would want to watch CGI films anymore, thus keeping 2D around...
Escapay
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 11:48 am
by Aladdin from Agrabah
Escapay wrote:You know, Zoltack, I can always build another time machine, and we can go back to 1995 and make Toy Story a flop so that no one would want to watch CGI films anymore, thus keeping 2D around...
Now, THAT seems really interesting!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 12:25 pm
by Lars Vermundsberget
That's an intriguing thought, but there's really no way of knowing what else would change, either, so I guess you'd better not.
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 1:09 pm
by Escapay
Lars Vermundsberget wrote:That's an intriguing thought, but there's really no way of knowing what else would change, either, so I guess you'd better not.
Hmm, you're right. We may accidentally keep Finding Nemo from happening!

Okay, scrap the time machine (again). Sorry, Zoltack.
Escapay
Posted: Sun May 21, 2006 4:23 pm
by Isidour
Or we could just call Teedee back, send her to Eisner`s and Iger`s house so they tell them in person that it wont be a TGMD sequel...if we`re lucky, we might have a bloody carnage...

Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:19 pm
by Lars Vermundsberget
Escapay wrote:Hmm, you're right. We may accidentally keep Finding Nemo from happening!

Okay, scrap the time machine (again). Sorry, Zoltack.
According to chaos theory you'd have to expect even greater unforeseeable consequences than that.
Posted: Mon May 22, 2006 2:25 pm
by Isidour
Like Bill gates being the CEO of Disney?
