DVDizzy Forum

Finally saw this and enjoyed it a lot. Found it to be pretty funny and very entertaining. Pascal is awesome, I have a feeling his toy will be very popular this holiday.

The songs as a whole were very solid and it was nice to hear new music from Menken. It lacked an "it" song for me, but "I See The Light" came close as the visuals during the piece were excellent.

I look forward to talking about this more in my next podcast.

Guess who I just spotted on little Rapunzel's mobile

Wonderlicious wrote:Well...let me just say that we should be glad that we didn't get that trashy train wreck. It starts off well enough (even the San Francisco joy ride scene, as much as it clashes with the enchanted forest part), but this clip shows that the idea of wanting to take two teens from the real world into the Rapunzel story was a stupid idea.

I totally agree with you on this. EEEKKK! What we got was excellent, I am so, so glad we didn't get that version, no offense to Mr. Keane or anyon else.

LucilleBallFilms wrote:Guess who I just spotted on little Rapunzel's mobile

That's adorable. <3 I don't recall noticing the chameleon during my first viewing. Also I want a mobile like that.

Fairytales wrote:

estefan wrote:So, I saw the official Tangled dolls for the first time today and I find it interesting that the boxes don't have the word "Tangled" anywhere. I understand why Rapunzel's box would only have her name, but even Flynn's box only says "Rapunzel" (funnily enough, her name is bigger than Flynn's, haha).
So, is this the first time that a character's film title doesn't appear on their box?

that reminds me of toy story 3, with Ken xD

Mostly with the "Groovin with Ken" featurette where the interviewer asks Ken if it bothered him if his name was 10 times smaller than Barbie's on his own box. I seriously never laughed that hard at a trailer before, let alone a Pixar trailer before. That trailer was the main reason I went to see it on the first day it came out (a bit OT, I'm sorry.)

But now we can call Flynn "a glorified Rapunzel accessory." XD

I'm sure most of you have already seen these on Facebook, but here are the originals and the 'final color' pic is in HQ

Progression sequence illustrating animation process from concept to final frame

Did anyone catch this? There's talk of Tangled 2! :O

http://www.whatsplaying.com.au/2010/12/ ... uel-slate/

However, do note that the article erroneously referred to Dick Cook when it should have been Rich Ross...

The other film, also a sequel, that’s high up on Cook’s to-do list is Tangled 2.

“No surprise, have you seen the numbers?” my contact asks. “It’s [Disney's] Shrek franchise”.

Stats87 wrote:Finally saw this and enjoyed it a lot. Found it to be pretty funny and very entertaining. Pascal is awesome, I have a feeling his toy will be very popular this holiday.

The songs as a whole were very solid and it was nice to hear new music from Menken. It lacked an "it" song for me, but "I See The Light" came close as the visuals during the piece were excellent.

I look forward to talking about this more in my next podcast.

Agreed. I finally took a two-hour walk to the nearest cinema just for this movie. it had all those moments prominent in Disney faerie tales.

note that Menken flew solo for the songs yet collaborated for the score.

the dynamic between mother gothel and rapunzel is very reminiscent of real-life parent/child relationships. All the more interesting making the mother figure the actual bad guy.

Next time somebody breaks into my house, im going straight for the cookware.

DisneyChris wrote:Did anyone catch this? There's talk of Tangled 2! :O

http://www.whatsplaying.com.au/2010/12/ ... uel-slate/

However, do note that the article erroneously referred to Dick Cook when it should have been Rich Ross...

The other film, also a sequel, that’s high up on Cook’s to-do list is Tangled 2.

“No surprise, have you seen the numbers?” my contact asks. “It’s [Disney's] Shrek franchise”.

wow - I am not buying this at all. Flubber 2??? That article sounds like BS to me.

I wouldn't mind a Tangled prequel, to be honest... if done right.

DisneyChris wrote:Did anyone catch this? There's talk of Tangled 2! :O

http://www.whatsplaying.com.au/2010/12/ ... uel-slate/

However, do note that the article erroneously referred to Dick Cook when it should have been Rich Ross...

The other film, also a sequel, that’s high up on Cook’s to-do list is Tangled 2.

“No surprise, have you seen the numbers?” my contact asks. “It’s [Disney's] Shrek franchise”.

NO MOAR SEQUELS

DisneyChris wrote:Did anyone catch this? There's talk of Tangled 2! :O

http://www.whatsplaying.com.au/2010/12/ ... uel-slate/

However, do note that the article erroneously referred to Dick Cook when it should have been Rich Ross...

The other film, also a sequel, that’s high up on Cook’s to-do list is Tangled 2.

“No surprise, have you seen the numbers?” my contact asks. “It’s [Disney's] Shrek franchise”.

Yeah, I don't believe a word of that article, considering it never even mentioned Rich Ross but Cook instead. And those sequel ideas are pretty ridiculous, especially Flubber 2.

Plus, Lasseter has killed the idea of direct-to-video sequels to animated features happening. Doesn't explain the endless Tinkerbell series, though.

And the Disney department that Lasseter seems to have no involvement with is intent on making DTV talking-dog pictures forever. Do those seriously sell well?

LucilleBallFilms wrote:Guess who I just spotted on little Rapunzel's mobile

I noticed Pascal hanging on the mobile on first viewing, but didn't realise the Snugly Duckling was there, too. Nice fore-shadowing to Rapunzel later saying "I like ducklings" in addition to the pub visit.

UmbrellaFish wrote:Yeah, I don't believe a word of that article, considering it never even mentioned Rich Ross but Cook instead. And those sequel ideas are pretty ridiculous, especially Flubber 2.

While I agree that Flubber 2 is an absurd idea (but absurd things can happen...), Three Men and a Baby 3 (or Three Men and a Bride) had already been reported to be in the works, even Tom Selleck confirmed this.

About Tangled 2, I'm not sure what to say, but this decade is already set to be bloated with animated sequels/spin-offs/remakes. From the top of my head:

Disney
Cars 2, Winnie the Pooh, Monsters, Inc. 2, Enchanted 2, Who Framed Roger Rabbit 2, the Tinker Bell movies, Planes (Cars spin-off)

Non-Disney
Kung Fu Panda 2/3/4/5/6 (!!), Happy Feet 2, Puss in Boots, Madagascar 3/4, How to Train Your Dragon 2/3, Ice Age 4, Warner Bros.' reboots of classic characters (Bugs Bunny, Marvin the Martian, Speedy Gonzales, Pepe le Pew etc.)

Seriously, it's a bit too much.

estefan wrote:Plus, Lasseter has killed the idea of direct-to-video sequels to animated features happening. Doesn't explain the endless Tinkerbell series, though.

tinkerbell's actually good. Plus, theres no mention of theatrical sequels.

And the Disney department that Lasseter seems to be intent on making DTV talking-dog pictures forever. Do those seriously sell well?

yes. and Lasseter has no say in them.

Have you seen these (new) pictures?


New Japanese poster background:

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/7315/bgpopup.jpg

A new still:

http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/8374 ... elarge.jpg

From the Panini sticker book:

http://img813.imageshack.us/img813/3255 ... qf0fbf.jpg

Another Background:

http://img836.imageshack.us/img836/1907 ... paskal.jpg

And another picture:

http://img547.imageshack.us/img547/1088 ... lpaper.jpg

ajmrowland wrote:

And the Disney department that Lasseter seems to be intent on making DTV talking-dog pictures forever. Do those seriously sell well?

yes. and Lasseter has no say in them.

Wow, massive typo on my part. Remind me never to go on here before breakfast. I meant to type "And the Disney department that Lasseter seems to have no involvement with is intent on making DTV talking-dog pictures forever. Do those seriously sell well?"

Major oops, there. Going back to edit the original post now.

A Tangled sequel? You're kidding, right?

Don't get me wrong, I love sequels and Tangled was amazing. But a sequel? That's completely unnecessary.

mokka456 wrote:Have you seen these (new) pictures?

Thanks! I especially love the last one with Rapunzel and Flynn!

DisneyJedi wrote:A Tangled sequel? You're kidding, right?

Don't get me wrong, I love sequels and Tangled was amazing. But a sequel? That's completely unnecessary.

I must agree. I do not think that, "Rapunzel (Tangled)," needs a sequel. And besides, Rapunzel just got a hair cut by Flynn (Eugene) at the end of the movie, unless Disney decided to make her hair grow out again, only this time in brown.