Page 3 of 7
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 5:22 pm
by Ciaobelli
RJKD23 wrote:Ciaobelli wrote:I migt rent it, first I'll read Luke's review though.
Oh yes of course!
Luke, your review is NECESSARY for me.
It basically tells me if the movie is worth buying!
only thing tough, even if it sucks beyond reason Luke will still make it sound like its not that bad. I don't know how he does it. He says it sucks but in a different way that other reviewers.
Princess Diaries 2 review is a good example.
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:37 pm
by Siren
Not to be TOO nit-picky, but that is a rhino, not a hippo
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 10:55 pm
by Thumper
YAY I can't wait til this comes out! I loved Tarzan!
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 10:56 pm
by RJKD23
Thumper wrote:YAY I can't wait til this comes out! I loved Tarzan!
Welcome
Thumper!
Glad to see there's someone else anticipating Tarzan II!
Posted: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:49 pm
by singerguy04
i'm excited to see what they can pull off for tarzan II, i think i'll be impressed, but then agains that's only because i'm anticipating the worse
that may be the best way to handle a movie like this.
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:54 pm
by Dan05
hasn't their been a Tarzan 2 already
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:55 pm
by RJKD23
Dan05 wrote:hasn't their been a Tarzan 2 already
You're probably thinking of Tarzan & Jane. (another sequel to Tarzan)
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 8:58 pm
by Dan05
RJKD23 wrote:Dan05 wrote:hasn't their been a Tarzan 2 already
You're probably thinking of Tarzan & Jane. (another sequel to Tarzan)
wouldn't that be classified as Tarzan 2 and this one be Tarzan 3
it would make more sense that way
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:00 pm
by RJKD23
Dan05 wrote:RJKD23 wrote:
You're probably thinking of Tarzan & Jane. (another sequel to Tarzan)
wouldn't that be classified as Tarzan 2 and this one be Tarzan 3
it would make more sense that way
well, you know Disney!
they found an idea to get money off us fans and decided to call it
TARZAN II since that name wasn't taken.
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:03 pm
by Dan05
RJKD23 wrote:Dan05 wrote:
wouldn't that be classified as Tarzan 2 and this one be Tarzan 3
it would make more sense that way
well, you know Disney!
they found an idea to get money off us fans and decided to call it
TARZAN II since that name wasn't taken.
lol yeah i guess so
but i don't get it if those are Tarzan 2 photos why is Tarzan, Tantar, and Turk so young again?
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:12 pm
by RJKD23
Dan05 wrote:lol yeah i guess so
but i don't get it if those are Tarzan 2 photos why is Tarzan, Tantar, and Turk so young again?
For
Tarzan II, they decided to film younger Tarzan.
I don't get why, but the idea's cute.
More info can be found here:
http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/vie ... =tarzan+ii
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:13 pm
by Isidour
I don´t really think this would be a good sequel--in fact, which one had?--
Don´t know, as it have said before, the draws are too basic, the story it´s like a "Bambi and the Great Prince" but in the jungle (and I´m not saying than BatGP will be a great sequel).
I don´t think than this movies are worthy to have a place in our disney collection, but hey, It´s JUST my opinion.
for me, maybe I rent BatGP--depends what the time let us know--but certanlly I´m not a sequel-buyer
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:19 pm
by Dan05
RJKD23 wrote:
For
Tarzan II, they decided to film younger Tarzan.
I don't get why, but the idea's cute.
oh ic see... seems more like a prequel to me, i'll probably end up watching it but won't like it cause i usually don't like sequels
thanks for helping me out RJKD23
Posted: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:35 pm
by Sunset Girl
I initially expected a continuation of the first film, with Tarzan traveling to England. That would have been very cool; the Tarzan from the original stories felt just as at home in civilzation as he did in the jungle.
Still, I'm looking forward to this. It should be interesting to see how his adaptability grew.
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:59 am
by Christian
I initially expected a continuation of the first film, with Tarzan traveling to England.
Maybe they'll still do that.
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:54 am
by Todd_star
RJKD23 wrote:Dan05 wrote:
wouldn't that be classified as Tarzan 2 and this one be Tarzan 3
it would make more sense that way
well, you know Disney!
they found an idea to get money off us fans and decided to call it
TARZAN II since that name wasn't taken.
Tarzan and Jane was not a sequel.
It was the Pilot episode to the tv series,
just like Stitch the movie.
That was not either a movie.
Tarzan II and Lilo & Stitch 2 will be the new real sequels.
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:03 pm
by Christian
Tarzan II and Lilo & Stitch 2 will be the new real sequels.
Exactly.
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:12 pm
by RJKD23
Todd_star wrote:Tarzan and Jane was not a sequel.
It was the Pilot episode to the tv series,
just like Stitch the movie.
That was not either a movie.
Tarzan II and Lilo & Stitch 2 will be the new real sequels.
Alritey, thanks for the info.
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:49 pm
by Dan05
Todd_star wrote:
Tarzan and Jane was not a sequel.
It was the Pilot episode to the tv series,
just like Stitch the movie.
That was not either a movie.
Tarzan II and Lilo & Stitch 2 will be the new real sequels.
Oh ic, that makes sense thanx todd star
to tell you the truth i hate how they make a disney movie into a series that is just dumb they are meant to be a movie and tv series are just awfully boring they've done this with aladdin, tarzan, lilo and stitch, etc and soon they will do it to emperors new groove i think it kills these movies as it has nothing really to do with the movie, so why won't Disney just stop with making disney movies into a tv series
sorry for getting a bit off topic
Posted: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:04 pm
by Mermaid Kelly
Thanks Luke for all the great pictures!!!
(I agree though, the frightened hippopotamus is kinda weird!
)
