DVDizzy Forum

Posted: **Fri Jan 14, 2011 4:57 pm**

Julian Carter wrote:
Lazario wrote:That was a rather mean-spirited post...
Now if Disney had announced Robin Hood for Diamond Edition status the mean-spiritedness would have been justifiable.

Just the words "Robin Hood" and "Diamond Edition" don't go together. A sparkling precious gem in the rustic backwoods commune of Sherwood forest. Sounds mighty fancy, huh?

Posted: **Tue Jan 25, 2011 12:00 am**

Lazario wrote:
Julian Carter wrote: Now if Disney had announced Robin Hood for Diamond Edition status the mean-spiritedness would have been justifiable.
Just the words "Robin Hood" and "Diamond Edition" don't go together. A sparkling precious gem in the rustic backwoods commune of Sherwood forest. Sounds mighty fancy, huh?

Robin Hood is an embarassment. Too bad, as the character designs are wonderful. There's just no story.

Posted: **Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:45 am**

I do kind of agree that Platinum Edition stretched out too far...I personally don't think films like Aladdin, Lady and the Tramp stick out as shining gems of Disney filmmaking. That said, the last two Platinum Editions, Sleeping Beauty and Pinocchio are absolutely PE-worthy all the way.

And it's just a name, but I'd rather 2-disc editions get called PE's than the stupid edition names they got. The Alice Un-Anniversary Edition, and Lilo and Stitch Big Wave (???) Edition come to mind hehe. If they aren't PEs, they should just get simple classy names, like the Pocahontas 10th Anniversary Edition.

Posted: **Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:42 pm**

Rudy Matt wrote:Robin Hood is an embarassment.

No it's not.

DVDizzy Forum

The Rescuers is a Platinum/Diamond edition?