DVDizzy Forum

Posted: **Mon Sep 18, 2006 7:53 pm**

numba1lostboy wrote:I always wanted a really great live-action PP movie, and was mildly disappointed with the 2003 version. Having Capt Hook fly and the whole story revolve around the love between Peter and Wendy kinda pissed me off.

And I would love a music video!!

I really liked the 2003 version because of how faithful so much of it was to the Barrie. But yes, the Peter and Wendy 'does she like him?' tension was WAY overdone. There is tension between the 2 of them, but when I saw that version, a little kid (maybe 8?) screamed out "THEY SHOULD HAVE SEX NOW!!!!!!" in the theatre. THAT means you've gone a little over the top.

Tinker Bell annoyed me in that version, too, but I still clapped to revive her with my friends...which the rest of the audience did not get, but oh well.

Posted: **Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:16 pm**

Disney Princess Ariellen wrote: I really liked the 2003 version because of how faithful so much of it was to the Barrie. But yes, the Peter and Wendy 'does she like him?' tension was WAY overdone. There is tension between the 2 of them, but when I saw that version, a little kid (maybe 8?) screamed out "THEY SHOULD HAVE SEX NOW!!!!!!" in the theatre. THAT means you've gone a little over the top.

I'm confused. You saw that version in theaters when you were 8? Or was it another version you saw when you were 8?

Posted: **Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:28 pm**

lord-of-sith wrote:
Disney Princess Ariellen wrote: I really liked the 2003 version because of how faithful so much of it was to the Barrie. But yes, the Peter and Wendy 'does she like him?' tension was WAY overdone. There is tension between the 2 of them, but when I saw that version, a little kid (maybe 8?) screamed out "THEY SHOULD HAVE SEX NOW!!!!!!" in the theatre. THAT means you've gone a little over the top.
I'm confused. You saw that version in theaters when you were 8? Or was it another version you saw when you were 8?

When she saw the 2003 version, there was an 8 year old in the thetre who screamed "THEY SHOULD HAVE SEX NOW!!!!!!"

Escapay

Posted: **Mon Sep 18, 2006 8:47 pm**

Ariellen, that must have been hilarious! And I clapped too

!

Another cool feature would be a 'Disney Fun Facts' track, such as those that the Aladdin PE and Narnia DVD had.

Posted: **Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:10 am**

Escapay wrote: When she saw the 2003 version, there was an 8 year old in the thetre who screamed "THEY SHOULD HAVE SEX NOW!!!!!!"

Escapay

Ohhhhh, ok. Thanks Escapay. I totally misread that post.

Posted: **Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:28 am**

I can just imagine the embarassed parents of that 8 year old boy. Honestly, what is the world coming to? (Seriously) Since when do 8-year old boys know about sex and already say the word aloud in public?

Posted: **Tue Sep 19, 2006 11:50 am**

I am absolutely in love with the 2003 version! Nearly (if not) everything about it!

Posted: **Tue Sep 19, 2006 7:45 pm**

numba1lostboy wrote:Ariellen, that must have been hilarious! And I clapped too !

It was hysterical in a somewhat sad sort of way...

But being with a group of people who clapped was awesome!

And thanks, Escapay, for explaining what my story meant.

Posted: **Thu Sep 21, 2006 1:55 am**

Disney has finally released cover art for the Peter Pan Platinum Edition! I don't really like it. Considering Disney don't make any Traditionally Animated 'Classics' anymore, I don't think they had enough money to pay for this cover-art, anyway, you be the judge.

And yes Wendy is a fish

Posted: **Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:04 am**

Josh wrote: And yes Wendy is a fish

Funny, I thought she was a bird. Tink said she was...

Escapay

Posted: **Thu Sep 21, 2006 8:43 am**

I like that cover art. They should release that one in March for the PE of Peter Pan.

Posted: **Thu Sep 21, 2006 8:48 am**

Hahaha

But, actually, Disney made the first film where Peter Pan was a boy...and in that coverart, he definitely is not a boy. lol.

Posted: **Thu Sep 21, 2006 8:54 am**

A lot of things can happen in about 50 years.

Posted: **Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:53 am**

Josh! That cover art almost gave me a heart attack!

Naughty naughty! Tsk tsk. You almost had me murdered boy!

Posted: **Thu Sep 21, 2006 11:52 am**

Dottie wrote:A lot of things can happen in about 50 years.

Yes but I think digitally painting breasts onto Peter in every scene would be a bit far to go even for Disney!

Posted: **Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:12 pm**

That would be the thread: "Peter Pan, restoration gone far too far?!"

Posted: **Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:56 pm**

ichabod wrote:
Dottie wrote:A lot of things can happen in about 50 years.
Yes but I think digitally painting breasts onto Peter in every scene would be a bit far to go even for Disney!

lol, I love how everyone instantly thinks about how Peter breasts would have to be digitally installed...never mind the fact that he would have a tail!

Posted: **Sat Sep 23, 2006 9:51 am**

Josh wrote:
ichabod wrote: Yes but I think digitally painting breasts onto Peter in every scene would be a bit far to go even for Disney!
lol, I love how everyone instantly thinks about how Peter breasts would have to be digitally installed...never mind the fact that he would have a tail!

But at least a green one. So there wouldn't be a lot of change to his normal otfit.

Posted: **Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:14 pm**

I'm really glad that Peter Pan is coming so soon! I loved this movie when I was little and The platinum edition should be great!

Posted: **Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:04 pm**

When is the Peter Pan Platinum Edition front cover going to be revealed?

DVDizzy Forum

Peter Pan: Platinum Edition DVD Press Release and Discussion