Posted: Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:46 pm
So how many of you are going to buy the new 2 Disc of High School Musical?
I probably will who knows...
I probably will who knows...
DVDizzy Forum
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
High School Musical: Remix Edition DVD Press Release
Page 3 of 3
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:33 pm
I might be picking it up.
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2006 4:20 pm
Albert's review has been posted here:
http://www.ultimatedisney.com/highschoo ... remix.html
http://www.ultimatedisney.com/highschoo ... remix.html
Posted: Tue Dec 05, 2006 2:03 am
Great review Albert. I agree with you, I'm so over it. It's so cliched, I just hope that our generation isn't defined by it, as The Breakfast Club, etc. were for the 80's. I hope that our generation is like defined by the movie "Thirteen", or something like that, I can't really think of something else right now.
-James
-James
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2006 10:26 pm
I actually might give my old one to one of my sibs and buy this cause I actually do wanna watch the new features.....It would have been a lot smarter if just this one would have been released
Posted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 2:10 pm
Well, I bought and recieved this "superficial"* dvd.
Oh my word. How the image suffers when shown in 4:3. Why do Disney insist on this when it was obviously filmed widescreen. I couldn't begin to count the number of times a supporting cast member disappeared out of frame, only to appear later (sometimes seconds later) when it's obvious they would remain onscreen all the time in 1:85 or so.
Plus, in addition to this, there's just so many camera set-ups which look cramped, or the main subjet is almost, but not quite, in the centre of the composition (something I doubt would be so noticable in widescreen).
It's hideous.
It reminds me of Ghostbusters in Pan and Scan: for a long time I thought that there were only 2 ghostbusters!
* Superficial® 2099net 2007
Oh my word. How the image suffers when shown in 4:3. Why do Disney insist on this when it was obviously filmed widescreen. I couldn't begin to count the number of times a supporting cast member disappeared out of frame, only to appear later (sometimes seconds later) when it's obvious they would remain onscreen all the time in 1:85 or so.
Plus, in addition to this, there's just so many camera set-ups which look cramped, or the main subjet is almost, but not quite, in the centre of the composition (something I doubt would be so noticable in widescreen).
It's hideous.
It reminds me of Ghostbusters in Pan and Scan: for a long time I thought that there were only 2 ghostbusters!
* Superficial® 2099net 2007