DVDizzy Forum

this round is closed.

leaving this round is one of my personal favs (for which i did no lobbying, mind you)
Serenity
along with
The Constant Gardner
and
Wedding Crashers

we're down to 12 movies, votes cut down to two...
see you in round 26!

Prince Eric- Next time we ever decided to argue like this(and I pray it's not anytime soon) at least READ what I have to say. Your last post didn't even make sense since you wouldn't have even said the first part.

I COMFIRMED MYSELF that when I said "crappy" that I was referring to King Kong ONLY! I edited my list, I confirmed it wasn't, I EVEN APOLOGIZED!!! You obviously skipped alot of days of school or just didn't pay attention in third grade.

Also, I'm not a "devotee of George Lucas". I hate Phantom Menace. I also didn't care for "Attack of the Clones" to much. Heck I admited Revenge of the Sith had it's problems, BUT I still loved Revenge and the original trilogy, but still I'm not all "that obsessive. I still think think Peter Jackson needs an editor since he has obviously never heard of editing. I'm not the ONLY one by the way, ever some critics agree with me, so you can't really call my opinion completely unique.

Also, I don't know how to say this, but you have informations, FROM YOUR OWN reviews, WRONG!!

Unlike a blind person like you, I READ what my "online enimies" have to say, and you even gave both King Kong and Charlie an "A"! You even gave Batman Begins an "A-"! So stop your lying!

Well okay I think we're pretty much done and I have won as I don't see how you can possibly argue anymore.

But next time Eric, learn to READ. Because even though I might have not seen as many Independant films as you, at least I know HOW to watch a film, and HOW to write a review, unlike you. I'm not sure how anyone can take you as seriously as you take youself after this!

jwa1107 wrote:this round is closed.

leaving this round is one of my personal favs (for which i did no lobbying, mind you)
Serenity
along with
The Constant Gardner
and
Wedding Crashers

we're down to 12 movies, votes cut down to two...
see you in round 26!

Well, why didn't you lobby for it? We had room in the alliance!

it was overwhelming, no alliance swing could have staved off that elimination

nifty though that it made it's way into the top 15...

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:Prince Eric- Next time we ever decided to argue like this(and I pray it's not anytime soon) at least READ what I have to say. Your last post didn't even make sense since you wouldn't have even said the first part.

I COMFIRMED MYSELF that when I said "crappy" that I was referring to King Kong ONLY! I edited my list, I confirmed it wasn't, I EVEN APOLOGIZED!!! You obviously skipped alot of days of school or just didn't pay attention in third grade.

Also, I'm not a "devotee of George Lucas". I hate Phantom Menace. I also didn't care for "Attack of the Clones" to much. Heck I admited Revenge of the Sith had it's problems, BUT I still loved Revenge and the original trilogy, but still I'm not all "that obsessive. I still think think Peter Jackson needs an editor since he has obviously never heard of editing. I'm not the ONLY one by the way, ever some critics agree with me, so you can't really call my opinion completely unique.

Also, I don't know how to say this, but you have informations, FROM YOUR OWN reviews, WRONG!!

Unlike a blind person like you, I READ what my "online enimies" have to say, and you even gave both King Kong and Charlie an "A"! You even gave Batman Begins an "A-"! So stop your lying!

Well okay I think we're pretty much done and I have won as I don't see how you can possibly argue anymore.

But next time Eric, learn to READ. Because even though I might have not seen as many Independant films as you, at least I know HOW to watch a film, and HOW to write a review, unlike you. I'm not sure how anyone can take you as seriously as you take youself after this!

Whoa, I haven't even been on this thread much lately, so I'm not surprsied I missed this.

Can't someone change their grades? In retrospect, the initial awe of King Kong, Charlie and the Chocolate Factor, and Batman Begins has worn off. They're all "B" territory for me now. Is that a crime, or do I have to do a final relisting of every 2005 movie so everyone can see my final grades? I don't mind it, if that's what you HAVE to have.

Also, was I lampooning your criticism of editing? No, I did not. Again, you can say what you want, but your initial attack was on three films, two of which you had not seen.

Prince Eric wrote:
Whoa, I haven't even been on this thread much lately, so I'm not surprsied I missed this.

Can't someone change their grades? In retrospect, the initial awe of King Kong, Charlie and the Chocolate Factor, and Batman Begins has worn off. They're all "B" territory for me now. Is that a crime, or do I have to do a final relisting of every 2005 movie so everyone can see my final grades? I don't mind it, if that's what you HAVE to have.

Also, was I lampooning your criticism of editing? No, I did not. Again, you can say what you want, but your initial attack was on three films, two of which you had not seen.

I never said you couldn't change your grades. In fact everyone has slight change of opinion after rewatching it. I was just saying that because you were saying you don't agree with what Entertainment Magazine says, yet it seems funny that you do agree with what they say the first time you see a movie and because you keep insulting me by saying I don't know how to judge a movie, but yet nobody is perfect as my example points out.

I never attacked Brokeback or Howl's. They don't look interesting to me, but I can't make an opinion. I have seen King Kong and that was why I used the word "crappy". I never implied that the other two were!

Okay I think we both agree that we've taken this longer than it shoud've. In the end we'll just agree to disagree, I think Star Wars was better than King Kong, you think visa-versa.

That's all!

You know it's a good Survivor when an argument in a closed round is higher up than the newest round.

You said "crap like these," implicating all three movies involved.

I should have made that point sooner.

End of story.

Prince Eric wrote:You said "crap like these," implicating all three movies involved.

I should have made that point sooner.

End of story.

That's what I was trying to point out! That's why I even apologized!!!

There! Now it's done!

Agree, it's done, you were wrong to begin with.

Wrong? No I wasn't? On what?

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:Wrong? No I wasn't? On what?

We're done.