Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:25 pm
Honestly, so long as its jammed packed I don't mind if these released are one disc. On some of the later PEs it just became a hassle switching discs when they could clearly fit on the one.
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
Oh, a lot less special. Lasseter - I'm looking at you. Explain yourself, asshole.DisneyJedi wrote:Umm... wow. The only Disney Diamond Edition to have one Blu-ray Disc and not two. Kind of makes it a little less special, ya know?
Um, as the CCO of the animation studios, exactly how much control does he have with Buena Vista Home Entertainment when it comes to the way Blu-ray releases are handled?Rudy Matt wrote:Oh, a lot less special. Lasseter - I'm looking at you. Explain yourself, asshole.
Thank you, I was too lazy to look it up.Escapay wrote:Lori MacPherson is the one in charge at Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment.
albert
No, it's not about the number of discs. It's whether or no they actually put effort into making new supplements. For Bambi, they simply ported the SD extras from the Platinum Edition DVD. So what we should be concerned about is whether they do the same for The Lion King, in which it would be a disappointing release as far a supplements go.DisneyJedi wrote:... Great. Now all we have to worry about is whether or not the DE of Lion King will get two BR discs and not just released in the stupid 3D Blu-ray pack
You need a very expensive audio system (at least $1500) and very good ears to hear any difference.yamiiguy wrote:Why does it make a difference if it's on two discs or one? If they don't have anything to fill a second disc it doesn't make much sense to split it across two to make it "special". I would have liked DTS-HD MA rather than DTS-HD HR. Though I have to admit I probably can't tell the difference, I don't even have surround sound
I agree, plus, I think the most important thing about any release is the picture/sound quality of the feature itself. Everyone seems hung up on the number of discs/paper inserts/additional features, and no one has even asked about the picture quality of the film (hello?). Unless everyone is just assuming without a doubt that the quality is going to be perfect, that is the question I am most curious about and would want answered from those that have advance copies.jpanimation wrote:No, it's not about the number of discs. It's whether or no they actually put effort into making new supplements.
Yes, it's still missing. It's the sped-up, RKO title-length blue castle (rather than the new CG one).jpanimation wrote:2099net, can you confirm that the RKO title is indeed still missing (that was another reason I wanted to upgrade to Blu).
None! After the opening Disney Blu-ray title, it goes straight to the main menu and I couldn't see any Sneak Peek option.nachonaco wrote:What are the previews on the bluray?
This is what I was thinking as well. Bambi was the first Platinum to really set the standard for the future releases, in particular in the structure of its documentary (having chapters of sorts, not featuring a narrator etc). That's my theory as to why Bambi is reusing the same documentary (which was pretty good, for the record), whereas Beauty and the Beast got a new one. I do honestly think that The Lion King will have a new documentary (unless the film is now cursed to receive bad home video releases2099net wrote:To be fair, I think that there's a justifiable reason for not including a new Making Of on the disc.
The Blu-rays released so far didn't really have any recent "making of" content from earlier DVD releases. Pinocchio had nothing, Sleeping Beauty's DVD just had a recycled Laser disc documentary, and I believe Snow White's earlier Platinum was mostly a re-edited Laser Disc documentary. Arguably Beauty and the Beast did have a documentary made for its platinum release - but that was release some time before Bambi's DVD release.
So Disney could be justified for not commissioning a new making of - the Platinum release has a reasonably modern making of documentary and this combined with the Inside Walt's Story Meetings feature (which I've been told runs to around 2 hours with the various extensions) mean a new extensive documentary would be somewhat redundant.
While I'll agree that one or two new featurettes could have been made, or a few old trailers be sourced, I do agree that the release is okay. In fact, it's probably on the same level with Alice in Wonderland, or the elusive Dumbo. It's probably better that we get a one-disc Blu-Ray with most everything left on as opposed to a two-discer with lots of features left off (read: Snow White, a, surprise, Diamond Edition).2099net wrote:The disc isn't really a disappointment - were this any other release I'm sure people would on the whole be positive about what it does do rather than what it is perceived not to do. Disney's various collection titles really are a mill-stone around their neck.
The picture quality is (virtually) perfect.MJW wrote:...I think the most important thing about any release is the picture/sound quality of the feature itself. Everyone seems hung up on the number of discs/paper inserts/additional features, and no one has even asked about the picture quality of the film (hello?). Unless everyone is just assuming without a doubt that the quality is going to be perfect, that is the question I am most curious about and would want answered from those that have advance copies.
nachonaco wrote:What are the previews on the bluray?
What!?! No sneak peeks? That's beyond odd for Disney not to advertise on their own movies.None! After the opening Disney Blu-ray title, it goes straight to the main menu and I couldn't see any Sneak Peek option.
Thanks. That looks awesome. A shame it's a DMC exclusive. At this point I don't think joining right now would be that big a benefit to me.jinkinquackers wrote:The_Iceflash wrote:Where can I find info in this Bambi book edition? I tried checking the DMC site but nothing's mentioned.
Bambi Diamond Edition Premium Package
That's all they have up on the website about it so far. I don't see any other information. If I find anything, I will post it and let you know.
That makes me excited! I can't wait for this now!jamesslater wrote:Hi from the UK. Sometime reader, first-time poster.
The picture quality is (virtually) perfect.MJW wrote:...I think the most important thing about any release is the picture/sound quality of the feature itself. Everyone seems hung up on the number of discs/paper inserts/additional features, and no one has even asked about the picture quality of the film (hello?). Unless everyone is just assuming without a doubt that the quality is going to be perfect, that is the question I am most curious about and would want answered from those that have advance copies.
Hope that answers your question.