DVDizzy Forum

Another new pet! Aurora got a chipmunk named Chipper. This time we get to see the pet in sketch form as the product hasn't been finalized yet.


Source: http://www.laughingplace.com/w/articles ... ce-pets/2/


Update: Chipper in color!


Source: https://www.hellobrendaho.com/disney-palace-pets

The princesses must do nothing but care for all their pets now. In fact, each of them could start a farm or something.

Mulan's new pet is a baby rhino named Alora!


Source: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01N0FRKMC/

They're not meaning that "Lee" = Li Shang, right...??!

Snow White's new pet is a hamster named Madame Hamilot!




Source: https://www.amazon.com/Disney-Whisker-F ... 0757VGBWY/


Rapunzel's new pet is a bear cub named Cubbie!




Source: https://www.amazon.com/Palace-Pets-New- ... 075MY4C71/

The newest episode of Whisker Haven Tales titled Tunnels of Fun introduced new Palace Pets.

Jasmine's cheetah named Sandstorm




Mulan's red panda named Chai




Ariel's puffin named Waddles




Aurora's new pet whose a name we don't know yet.

In the episode Ashes to Ashes, Belle's new pet Lacy made an appearance.

New pets are coming! Tiana is getting a tiger cub and Jasmine a puppy.

Cinderella has a new puppy named La Grande.


Source: https://www.kevinramirez.com/disney-whi ... ace-pets-1

I saw this books at Amazon and I don't know what to think. It doesn't have any sense to release this books now, Disney has not released anything about Palace pets in these years and now they release books. What do you think?

That's peculiar, indeed. The brand has been dormant for quite some time now. The upcoming book is just a repackaging of an older book called "Blossom: A Happy Panda for Mulan". No new story or artwork have been produced. My guess is this was something hastily put together by the publisher to capitalize on the release of the live-action Mulan. I highly doubt the line has been revived.

Sotiris wrote:That's peculiar, indeed. The brand has been dormant for quite some time now. The upcoming book is just a repackaging of an older book called "Blossom: A Happy Panda for Mulan". No new story or artwork have been produced. My guess is this was something hastily put together by the publisher to capitalize on the release of the live-action Mulan. I highly doubt the line has been revived.

But there's also another one with Rapunzel

I don't know what to tell you. That's also an older book titled "Blondie: Rapunzel's Royal Pony" getting republished under the "Step into Reading" label. The situation is weird for sure, but if they were reviving the brand there would be some activity in other areas like toy manufacturing.

Sotiris wrote:I don't know what to tell you. That's also an older book titled "Blondie: Rapunzel's Royal Pony" getting republished under the "Step into Reading" label. The situation is weird for sure, but if they were reviving the brand there would be some activity in other areas like toy manufacturing.

That's what I think...I actually think that this brand would not work if they decide to released it again.

I don't think it was very lucrative in the first place because they didn't waste much time in cancelling it. And on social media and online, it was mainly being lambasted.

Um guys, Disney never replaced the original pets and animal sidekicks of the Disney Princesses when they did Palace Pets, they had them acknowledged during the Palace Pets sub-franchise such as the Palace Pets books.





Does that make any of you less angry about the Palace Pets and accept them better?

DEEcat98 wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 10:31 am Um guys, Disney never replaced the original pets and animal sidekicks of the Disney Princesses when they did Palace Pets, they had them acknowledged during the Palace Pets sub-franchise such as the Palace Pets books.





Does that make any of you less angry about the Palace Pets and accept them better?

Why do you keep deleting and reposting this?

nachonaco wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 2:17 pm

DEEcat98 wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 10:31 am Um guys, Disney never replaced the original pets and animal sidekicks of the Disney Princesses when they did Palace Pets, they had them acknowledged during the Palace Pets sub-franchise such as the Palace Pets books.





Does that make any of you less angry about the Palace Pets and accept them better?

Why do you keep deleting and reposting this?

Um, because can anyone be aware and see the evidence that Disney never replaced the original pets and animal companions of the Disney Princesses with the Palace Pets?

I mean, does that save the Palace Pets?

Who said that Palace pets replaced Disney Princesse's original pets?.
Nobody cared about them because they were a cheap franchise that mixed My little pony with Littlest Pet shop. They didn't even created good stories for them and the designs were lazy. They only wanted to release more and more toys without a good development of each of the new characters.

I dont think their intention was to replace the animal Sidekicks, but to create furry versions of the princesses

And i agree with Thumper, the Littlest pet Shop and MLP hype in the 2010s playeda big influence too