Re: Home on the Range
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2022 1:56 pm
This is a podcast episode with John Sanford and Will Finn, the two directors of HotR. It's just over an hour long, and I thoroughly enjoyed it. The HotR stuff really starts at 24:53 if you want to save a little time, but I thought it was all interesting.
Secret History of Disney's Home on the Range
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAbqyfGtxkM
Some highlights:
*I know that Sarah Jessica Parker was assumed to be Pearl on websites before the movie came out, but the podcast said that she was originally Grace, but when they rewrote the character, she didn't understand the character (being tone deaf). (They figured they needed one of the cows to be immune to Slim's power, or else there would be 3 main characters "unconscious" for a large part of the movie.)
*McDonald's wouldn't allow marketing of a movie with "Bullets" in the title, so the podcast says that's why the title was changed to Home on the Range. I'm not sure how that coincided with the fact that Bullets the calf wasn't part of the story anymore, though...
*Michael Eisner wanted The Willies to tell the story in flashback from jail, with 6 months left of production.
*One of the directors (it was hard to keep them straight sometimes) asked if HotR could be CGI but was told no.
*Previews went well.
*"HotR didn't appeal to anyone. Thomas Schumacher said it appealed to young and dumb." "They didn't understand who the true audience was." [It should have been for everyone, not just small kids...Jeffrey Katzenberg understood that but 2004 Disney didn't.]
*The directors and Michael Eisner liked a trailer that was made, and Marketing went ahead and used a different trailer, the one that ended up coming out.
*The film was delivered on time and under budget. The budget was $125 million, and they made it for $115 - $120 million. (Earlier in the podcast, they had said that a lot of the budget had been used up with the previous version directed by Mike Giamo and Mike Gabriel.)
*At the premiere, "you don't know if it's a failure or a success." Leonard Maltin liked the movie. I think it was John Sanford that said, "The look of the film is flawless. Storywise it's at least coherent."
*Under previous animation execs, the mindset was 'we're all a team, we stick together no matter how the film does.' Under David Stainton, "suddenly we weren't invited to meetings anymore." Both directors tried pitching movies after HotR and David Stainton wasn't interested. Making the directors feel blamed for the "failure" of HotR.
*John Sanford "made it clear" that he didn't want to collaborate with Will Finn again (per Will). John "can't watch that movie," but he is proud of some of it.
*"Everybody did their best and yet the movie's not that good."
Secret History of Disney's Home on the Range
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dAbqyfGtxkM
Some highlights:
*I know that Sarah Jessica Parker was assumed to be Pearl on websites before the movie came out, but the podcast said that she was originally Grace, but when they rewrote the character, she didn't understand the character (being tone deaf). (They figured they needed one of the cows to be immune to Slim's power, or else there would be 3 main characters "unconscious" for a large part of the movie.)
*McDonald's wouldn't allow marketing of a movie with "Bullets" in the title, so the podcast says that's why the title was changed to Home on the Range. I'm not sure how that coincided with the fact that Bullets the calf wasn't part of the story anymore, though...
*Michael Eisner wanted The Willies to tell the story in flashback from jail, with 6 months left of production.
*One of the directors (it was hard to keep them straight sometimes) asked if HotR could be CGI but was told no.
*Previews went well.
*"HotR didn't appeal to anyone. Thomas Schumacher said it appealed to young and dumb." "They didn't understand who the true audience was." [It should have been for everyone, not just small kids...Jeffrey Katzenberg understood that but 2004 Disney didn't.]
*The directors and Michael Eisner liked a trailer that was made, and Marketing went ahead and used a different trailer, the one that ended up coming out.
*The film was delivered on time and under budget. The budget was $125 million, and they made it for $115 - $120 million. (Earlier in the podcast, they had said that a lot of the budget had been used up with the previous version directed by Mike Giamo and Mike Gabriel.)
*At the premiere, "you don't know if it's a failure or a success." Leonard Maltin liked the movie. I think it was John Sanford that said, "The look of the film is flawless. Storywise it's at least coherent."
*Under previous animation execs, the mindset was 'we're all a team, we stick together no matter how the film does.' Under David Stainton, "suddenly we weren't invited to meetings anymore." Both directors tried pitching movies after HotR and David Stainton wasn't interested. Making the directors feel blamed for the "failure" of HotR.
*John Sanford "made it clear" that he didn't want to collaborate with Will Finn again (per Will). John "can't watch that movie," but he is proud of some of it.
*"Everybody did their best and yet the movie's not that good."