Page 2 of 2
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:32 pm
by orestes.
That slipcover you drew out is my favourite kind. If people need an actual one to look at go see the original DVD release of Moulin Rouge! or the Clerks. X dvds.
Re: Mulan not good enough?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:36 pm
by RJKD23
Wonderlicious wrote:
Speaking of slipcovers, does anybody think that Disney should try a type of slipcover like in this very bad diagram that I've drawn on Paint (though I've given the sample DVD a nice message)?
Diagram:
I would prefer that slipcover!:D
Re: Mulan not good enough?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:39 pm
by Dan05
Wonderlicious wrote:
Diagram:
Not to be rude or anything but I prefer the current slipcovers
Although I got to admit thats a pretty cool idea
Re: Mulan not good enough?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 4:41 pm
by RJKD23
Dan05 wrote:Not to be rude or anything but I prefer the current slipcovers
Although I got to admit thats a pretty cool idea
The reason I said I preferred that..was because somtimes my DVD is too tight in the current Disney slipcover.. I have to force and push the DVD to come out.
and then other times, it's too loose!
dang it Disney.
Get your dimensions right with these slipcovers!
Re: Mulan not good enough?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:16 pm
by PrincessJen
RJKD23 wrote:Dan05 wrote:Not to be rude or anything but I prefer the current slipcovers
Although I got to admit thats a pretty cool idea
The reason I said I preferred that..was because somtimes my DVD is too tight in the current Disney slipcover.. I have to force and push the DVD to come out.
and then other times, it's too loose!
dang it Disney.
Get your dimensions right with these slipcovers!
i've noticed this problem too. makes it seem like the slipcovers gonna be damaged
Re: Mulan not good enough?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:36 pm
by The Lizard King
stitcharielbeast wrote:I don't exactly remember 101 Dalmatians or Lady and the Tramp being based on books but they are going to have a book slip covers because they are Platinum editions...
How do you know that they will have a book slip cover?
TLK
Re: Mulan not good enough?
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:51 am
by ichabod
Wonderlicious wrote:
Diagram:
That's what the french DVDs such as Brother and Lilo and Stitch are like!
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 1:59 am
by 2099net
Do you guys not actually think that a Slipcover should have a different cover to the actual DVD case too? I mean, the Mulan cover is pretty pointless, and when you think about it, so are the "opens like a book" covers.
At least Disney France has different images.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 2:09 am
by ichabod
2099net wrote:At least Disney France has different images.
Really? My Brother Bear DVD has the same image on the slipcover and on the actual DVD case!
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:24 am
by 2099net
ichabod wrote:2099net wrote:At least Disney France has different images.
Really? My Brother Bear DVD has the same image on the slipcover and on the actual DVD case!
Well, Lilo and Stitch and Pocahontas do!
Re: Mulan not good enough?
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:17 am
by Jayden
RJKD23 wrote:Wonderlicious wrote:
Speaking of slipcovers, does anybody think that Disney should try a type of slipcover like in this very bad diagram that I've drawn on Paint (though I've given the sample DVD a nice message)?
Diagram:
I would prefer that slipcover!:D
I don't think I would, honestly. However, it all depends on the DVD case inside. If it's a standard Amray case inside, great! That'd be good. However, if it's one of those oh so annoying digipacks, forget it. Those things drive me up the wall and I would prefer Disney stick with the Amray cases.
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 7:23 am
by Jayden
Mulan isn't the only one with this style of slipcover, as Finding Nemo, A Bugs Life, and Pirates of the Carribean: Curse of the Black Pearl (All Special editions) all have the same style of cover. I'm thinking that you'll see Disney's October SE release in this format now, and only their Platinum's and "Anniversary Editions/Masterpiece Editions" will have the book style. We'll have to wait and see though