Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 5:20 am
Edit: Well, never mind. Needlessly hostile.
I hope you don't feel offended by someone just voicing his opinionqindarka wrote:Edit: Well, never mind. Needlessly hostile.
Page 2 of 39
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 9:43 am
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:27 am
Wow Reinier, you're certainly a negative nancy today.
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:49 pm
This better be for real...
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 1:18 pm
it's clear you did not read my previous postSWillie! wrote:Wow Reinier, you're certainly a negative nancy today.
Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 2:08 pm
Yes I did, you're allowed to voice your opinion all you want. I'm not offended, just pointing out that it seems very negative.REINIER wrote:it's clear you did not read my previous postSWillie! wrote:Wow Reinier, you're certainly a negative nancy today.
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 10:04 am
Hey hey hey! Let's not get negative here. This is very happy news thread. Let's be happy. 
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Oo4OnQpwjkc?rel=0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Oo4OnQpwjkc?rel=0" frameborder="0"></iframe>
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:09 pm
I must admit reading back I was kinda crankySWillie! wrote:Yes I did, you're allowed to voice your opinion all you want. I'm not offended, just pointing out that it seems very negative.REINIER wrote: it's clear you did not read my previous post
sorry SWillie! You were right for pointing it out to me
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:11 pm
Just a thought... doesn't Mickey look like he was drawn with the Paperman technique here? Or not...
http://newsletter.disneyinternational.c ... _Hhe-wt1xl
http://newsletter.disneyinternational.c ... _Hhe-wt1xl
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 2:14 pm
hahaLnds500 wrote:Just a thought... doesn't Mickey look like he was drawn with the Paperman technique here? Or not...
http://newsletter.disneyinternational.c ... _Hhe-wt1xl
so true!Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:15 pm
Umm... No. He's simply rendered in black and white.
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:18 pm
If you think that looks like Paperman you should see steamboat willie.
Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 3:52 pm
Kyle wrote:If you think that looks like Paperman you should see steamboat willie.
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:41 pm
I agree with you of Mickey Mouse Clubhouse, but with all due respect, I like Mickey Mouse Works shorts. They're fun.PixarFan2006 wrote:TsWade is going to have a heart attack from excitement when he (or she) hears this. I wonder how this will turn out. Hopefully they will be more like the classic shorts and not like the preschool shows or Mickey Mouseworks shorts from the late 90s.
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:51 pm
Apparently, this is what the new shorts will look like.
Unfortunately, I can't watch the video, since I don't live in the United States.
Definitely looks like an old-school design (albeit with a twist), based on the thumbnail.
Unfortunately, I can't watch the video, since I don't live in the United States.
Definitely looks like an old-school design (albeit with a twist), based on the thumbnail.
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:52 pm
I would prefer the classic look, but this is good too!estefan wrote:Apparently, this is what the new shorts will look like.
Unfortunately, I can't watch the video, since I don't live in the United States.
Definitely looks like an old-school design (albeit with a twist), based on the thumbnail.
Mickey Mouse Shorts officially announced by Disney: Preview!
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:54 pm
Here is the press release from D23 along with the preview
http://d23.disney.go.com/news/2013/03/m ... ary-flair/
What do you guys think?
I think they look really cheap and i hate that animation style with a passion. It's not as lush and beautiful as the 1930s-50s style of color cartoons from the Walt Disney Company.
The designs of the characters are terrible too, plain ugly.
But if you read the press release it sort've makes sense. These will only be on the website and on Disney channel. I bet the budget is small.
Thats no excuse for the character design being so terrible though!
http://d23.disney.go.com/news/2013/03/m ... ary-flair/
What do you guys think?
I think they look really cheap and i hate that animation style with a passion. It's not as lush and beautiful as the 1930s-50s style of color cartoons from the Walt Disney Company.
The designs of the characters are terrible too, plain ugly.
But if you read the press release it sort've makes sense. These will only be on the website and on Disney channel. I bet the budget is small.
Thats no excuse for the character design being so terrible though!
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:11 pm
They look terrible. Compare them to the 1930s-0s shorts in animation,design, and background quality. How do they hold up?
The character designs are horrendous, this looks like it's for toddlers much like MMCH.
These are for Disney Channel and their website, so it probably has no budget.
I was hoping for theatrical shorts in the same quality as runaway brain, such a letdown.
The character designs are horrendous, this looks like it's for toddlers much like MMCH.
These are for Disney Channel and their website, so it probably has no budget.
I was hoping for theatrical shorts in the same quality as runaway brain, such a letdown.
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:55 pm
Eeek! I'll hold judgement until I actually see one of these but yeah, they aren't meant to look lavish, are they? They *may* be funny and entertaining and may be popular.
Update: Just watched it. I wasn't overwhelmed by it, it was okay. I didn't think that they were going to go this direcetion but it was alright. Worth watching.
Update: Just watched it. I wasn't overwhelmed by it, it was okay. I didn't think that they were going to go this direcetion but it was alright. Worth watching.
Posted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 2:56 pm
I'm digging the designs. However, I prefer they be done in 2-D traditional but this is nice too.
So yeah, I'm gonna like this. ^_^
So yeah, I'm gonna like this. ^_^