Page 2 of 2
Re: WALT DISNEY's Cinderella -- not branding, his credit
Posted: Sat May 20, 2023 2:43 am
by carolinakid
It should be Walt Disney’s for every film he touched personally; then Walt Disney Productions or Walt Disney Studios or Walt Disney Company for every film thereafter.
And I NEVER skip opening or closing credits when watching a film. It’s just unheard of to me, but of course, to each his own.
Re: WALT DISNEY's Cinderella -- not branding, his credit
Posted: Sat May 20, 2023 3:03 am
by Sotiris
Aiota wrote: ↑Fri May 19, 2023 11:14 pm
Today is the day I came to know about switching of Walt Disney's to Disney. I'm one of those who only looks at the movie name and when watching the movie, skip the starting & credits. As someone said above
True. It leaves no impression on me before.
But after reading these posts, i realize what it is about. And i, too, agree that they should have used Disney's instead of only Disney to show their possessiveness on their titles. Disney Cinderella - no sense.
Even the Marvel is good in that regard. They always MARVEL's or MARVEL STUDIO's in both, movies & games' names.
This is a bot.
Re: WALT DISNEY's Cinderella -- not branding, his credit
Posted: Mon May 22, 2023 10:17 am
by Woodrow Pride
Sotiris wrote: ↑Sat May 20, 2023 3:03 am
This is a bot.
Just because I'm crazy, I ran the post through a program to see if it was written by ai, but it said it was 77% likely to be human text...
Re: WALT DISNEY's Cinderella -- not branding, his credit
Posted: Mon May 22, 2023 11:08 am
by Sotiris
It probably copied the text of what a real person wrote somewhere else online, but that member was 100% a spam bot.
Re: WALT DISNEY's Cinderella -- not branding, his credit
Posted: Mon May 22, 2023 11:12 am
by Woodrow Pride
Sotiris wrote: ↑Mon May 22, 2023 11:08 am
It probably copied the text of what a real person wrote somewhere else online, but that member was 100% a spam bot.
Oh, okay, good to know.
