DVDizzy Forum

As happy as I am about this news...it has me wondering. I might wait on most of these titles till Disney All Access starts. If they are going to offer HD movies as streamline purchases, there are a lot of these movies I would like to own, but don't necessarily need a hard copy of. Of course I'll buy the animated films, and some of my other personal favorites, but it will be interesting to see if these are being rushed to get people to buy hardcopies before the films go on sale online.

Barbossa wrote:Treasure Planet and Home on the Range for me as those are DACs. Should get seperate threads started for these two.

reyquila already put in a pre-order for the whole list.

zackisthewalrus wrote:Treasure Planet (Animated)
Home on the Range (Animated)

I mentioned this in another thread but seriously? Disney's two biggest flops get Blu-rays before Hunchback or Hercules? Disney celebrates Treasure Planet's 10th Anniversary but Lilo & Stitch just get blown off (also celebrating a 10th). How about Aladdin's 20th Anniversary, isn't that worth celebrating? They'll probably be either barebones or paired with cheapquels.

It's like Disney is releasing all my least favorite movies first. I'd love to see The Emperor's New Groove, Aladdin, Lilo & Stitch and Mulan get some love or even have Disney acknowledge Hunchback and Hercules existence.

Still, I'm excited for The Absent-Minded Professor.

jpanimation wrote:I mentioned this in another thread but seriously? Disney's two biggest flops get Blu-rays before Hunchback or Hercules? Disney celebrates Treasure Planet's 10th Anniversary but Lilo & Stitch just get blown off (also celebrating a 10th). How about Aladdin's 20th Anniversary, isn't that worth celebrating? They'll probably be either barebones or paired with cheapquels.

It's like Disney is releasing all my least favorite movies first. I'd love to see The Emperor's New Groove, Aladdin, Lilo & Stitch and Mulan get some love or even have Disney acknowledge Hunchback and Hercules existence.

Disney is now releasing Aladdin as a Diamond Edition; it was confirmed in the booklet for Lady and the Tramp. As far as the back catalogue is concerned, it looks as though their tactic is, within a certain time frame, to put out an even balance of fairly popular films (such as Pocahontas, The Aristocats) alongside less popular films (such as Home on the Range). I know that it does seem odd that Treasure Planet would get a 10th Anniversary Edition over Lilo and Stitch, but I'm sure that we'll see that film, and the others you mentioned, in good time. I too worry, however, about Disney pairing sequels with originals, especially as far as films with absolutely diabolical sequels are concerned (read: The Hunchback of Notre Dame II).

jpanimation wrote:

zackisthewalrus wrote:Treasure Planet (Animated)
Home on the Range (Animated)

I mentioned this in another thread but seriously? Disney's two biggest flops get Blu-rays before Hunchback or Hercules? Disney celebrates Treasure Planet's 10th Anniversary but Lilo & Stitch just get blown off (also celebrating a 10th).

It's like Disney is releasing all my least favorite movies first. I'd love to see The Emperor's New Groove, Aladdin, Lilo & Stitch and Mulan get some love or even have Disney acknowledge Hunchback and Hercules existence.

I agree with you, most specifically with regard to Hunchback and Hercules. Disney just continuously seems to be giving these two films the stiff arm, while all of the other films of that era have gotten respectable re-releases, in some cases 2 re-releases with Blu-ray included either currently or in the near future. I agree with your point on Lilo and Stitch, although it was awesome getting that 2 hour plus documentary on the Big Wave Edition DVD. That feature alone can tide me over...for now.

Hmmmm... no Blu-ray release of Who Framed Roger Rabbit yet? I guess Disney has plans for that one bigger than these catalog releases.

Though I will buy the Ed Wood Blu-ray at least. No doubt in my mind about that.

This thread is sort of a painful reminder of how a lot of Disney's films aren't important enough to me for Blu-ray upgrading. Unless I could do so for five bucks or something. Er, you listening, Buena Vista?

enigmawing wrote:Er, you listening, Buena Vista?

It's Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, now!

Cover art for Ed Wood and Beaches :


©Disney Enterprises


©Disney Enterprises

Sotiris wrote:

enigmawing wrote:Er, you listening, Buena Vista?

It's Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, now!

Old habits die hard.

enigmawing wrote:

Sotiris wrote: It's Walt Disney Studios Home Entertainment, now!

Old habits die hard.

I still call them Buena Vista, too. Not only does it give one a sense of nostalgia, but it's a lot shorter to say/write

^

I didn't even like the first movie. Why would the sequel's Blu-Ray be a big deal???????

The first movie is a modern classic. The second was pretty good too. The third was not great.

But the series as a whole seems to have quite a big fanbase. And for good reason, in my opinion.

I'm happy to see it looks like the Santa Clause films will be available in separate releases. I only want the first one.

TheSequelOfDisney wrote:

zackisthewalrus wrote: Beginning in October Disney will release Hocus Pocus

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So so so so so so excited for this release!!!!

As am IFinally!!!! The song alone is spellbinding

SWillie! wrote:The first movie is a modern classic.

Um... "okay." (For people who are already a little regressed.) If I may, though, I'd say it's just a needless screwball comedy for people who actually think Tim Allen is funny. Tell me one thing that's classic about it. Rather than dated or painfully popularizing an awful trend (fat suit comedy... and no, it certainly wasn't the first- Nothing but Trouble). And I wanted to take that little kid actor playing the son and drop him into a wood chipper. While it was on (of course).

SWillie! wrote:The second was pretty good too.

Um... NO. No.

And, my hands have been tied, you now deserve this:

<iframe src="http://blip.tv/play/AYLiolgC.html?p=1" width="480" height="390" frameborder="0"></iframe><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://a.blip.tv/api.swf#AYLiolgC"></embed>

SWillie! wrote:The third was not great.

(Neither was the first one.)

SWillie! wrote:But the series as a whole seems to have quite a big fanbase. And for good reason, in my opinion.

Too much time on their hands and no sense of taste.

That's good reason?

Lazario wrote:

SWillie! wrote:The first movie is a modern classic.

Um... "okay." (For people who are already a little regressed.)

What does this even mean??

Lazario wrote:If I may, though, I'd say it's just a needless screwball comedy for people who actually think Tim Allen is funny. Tell me one thing that's classic about it. Rather than dated or painfully popularizing an awful trend (fat suit comedy... and no, it certainly wasn't the first- Nothing but Trouble). And I wanted to take that little kid actor playing the son and drop him into a wood chipper. While it was on (of course).

Well, I suppose I'm a sucker for any "Magic of Christmas" movies. I don't think it's strictly a fat-suit comedy. It has a WHOLE lot more to it. The family struggles, the father/son relationship, the "true meaning" of Christmas. Plus, it's pretty funny. And I definitely don't see what's wrong with the kid... I think he's great?

Certainly people my age, that more or less grew up with the film, are extremely fond of it.

Hocus Pocus Blu-Ray Cover!:

http://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.php?p ... tcount=623

Mickeyfan1990 wrote:Hocus Pocus Blu-Ray Cover!:

http://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.php?p ... tcount=623

As much as I'd LOVE that cover, it looks fan made. The dead give away for me is the fact that it's so out of focus but the DMR logo and Disney Blu-ray logo are perfect.