DVDizzy Forum

Goliath wrote:

I know there's been press releases of the company that produces the clothes, saying that it's not "lingerie". It's a form of damage control after the backlash they've received. However, the costumes these press releases describe match the outfits shown in the photo's *exactly*. They're just distancing themselves of the term "lingerie" and think that will make it all all-right.

... because we all know how much grown women looooooooove to dress up like ladybugs, TUTUS INCLUDED! Obviously somebody has never been to Party City. (half joking).

A while back, I bought a Miley Cyrus book on secondhand to read out of curiosity. It's titled Mad for Miley.

Here's an intriguing tidbit from page 88:

Billy Ray knows all too well the pressures that come with the biz. And he has cautioned Miley to watch out for the good as well as the bad. Billy Ray's also confident that Miley won't be a wild teenager who's always getting into trouble.

O RLY?

And to me, the girl holding up forked fingers is giving the 'V' for victory sign.

Goliath wrote:

Ok, as for the ladybug outfit(s?) . . . whether or not they're labeled as lingerie, I certainly wouldn't want to see any little girls wearing those things. They look like a slutty excuse of the Halloween-type costumes that older girls like to wear, but to be fair it looks as though they're leaning against a giant pumpkin. And the black dress thing, why is it so short? The boots certainly don't help with the supposed innocence of the images here either.

The tutus . . . ok, I can deal with them. But the pole is pushing it. And in the last pic, once again, why are the dress things so short (I hesitate to call them actual dresses). They are definitely being sexualized in all these pics and it's sad the Billy Ray is ok with his young daughter going out in public like this.

As for the peace sign . . . if the back of the hand is facing the signer, it's "peace" or "victory." If the palm is facing the signer, it's insulting in certain countries, not typically the US. She probably didn't know better.

This is simply another reason why ever member of the Cyrus family is a complete idiot.......


It's like they just don't get it.

TheSequelOfDisney wrote:It's like they just don't get it.

Yes they get it. They get lot$ of it!

Perhaps Billy Ray should have another kid to target the 0-5 range?

deleted

KennethE wrote:... because we all know how much grown women looooooooove to dress up like ladybugs, TUTUS INCLUDED! Obviously somebody has never been to Party City. (half joking).

Grown women? This line is meant for young children. I don't get what you're saying. What is your point, if you have any at all? Are you here to downplay the disgrace that is putting makeup and sexually provocative outfits on 9 year old children? If so, why? Because her sister is a Disney 'star'?

You know, this is why Pedophiles say the little girl was asking for it... No respectable parent should let their child dress this way. You might as well just tape a big "RAPE ME" sign to them.