Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:06 am
by akhenaten
why dont they do a disney princess babies..so we can have the ORIGINAL mothers...partying with the disney princess as babies...including kida's mother..and mulan's mother can proudly say she's the only surviving good mother.arurora's mom knows zilch about her..so yeah.

Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:41 am
by Ariel'sprince
akhenaten-Actually there is Disney Princess Babies,it's scary,there's Snow White,Cinderella,Aurora,Ariel (What's funny about her that they made her a human),Belle,Jasmine and Mulan (At least Pocahontas is saved),it's creepy.

Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:43 am
by akhenaten
show me proof! no pocahontas? :(

Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:52 am
by Ariel'sprince
Proof of what?.
Turst me,you should be happy that she's not there.

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:41 am
by supertalies
Behold:
Image
Ariel is a mermaid, as you see.
I couldn't find one of Jasmine and Mulan, but they look the same as these.
I have seen their pictures in a store somewhere, so that is how I know.
(And Poca wasn't there!)
Mulan in her green/girl clothing and Jas in the dress she wore in the 2e sequel, only dark purple.

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 11:51 am
by Ariel'sprince
That's not Baby Princesses,that's little Princess,here's Jasmine,Pocahontas and Mulan:
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p61/ ... baby1c.gif
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p61/ ... baby2c.gif
http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p61/ ... lpokic.gif
That's Baby Princesses (Warning-Do NOT click on this link if you have a week stomach or are easy scared):
http://www.amazon.com/Disney-My-Baby-Pr ... B0002CK9GQ
No Pocahontas.

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:08 pm
by supertalies
Ow!
I had found those pictures before, but aren't those the same as the ones I posted, only dolls of it?

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 12:22 pm
by akhenaten
yikes! i donno whether to kiss em or to slap em.

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 5:16 pm
by Sotiris
akhenaten wrote:yikes! i donno whether to kiss em or to slap em.
:lol: :lol:

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 7:06 am
by supertalies
well, why don't you do both :lol: :P

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 7:12 am
by Ariel'sprince
supertalies wrote:Ow!
I had found those pictures before, but aren't those the same as the ones I posted, only dolls of it?
No,those are Baby Princesses with much different cliparts from the Little Princesses (What you posted is Little Princesses).
Those are just scary.

Posted: Sun May 18, 2008 11:05 am
by Prudence
There actually was a Baby Pocahontas in the collection, as well as a Baby Mulan.

Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 8:28 pm
by musicradio77
Nice pic, this was not from the film, it was from a book as well as a Disney read-along book and record/tape. I remember these are from the 80's.

Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 9:28 pm
by Isidour
Geez...Is Disney that desperate for money?

Come on, they're horribly deformed!(Except Snowhite which reminds me somehow Paola when she was just a little cute girl :D )

Posted: Wed May 21, 2008 1:26 am
by BelleGirl
Back to the original topic: I used to have a Disney book of Snow white which showed the exactly same picture of Snow White's mother as posted on this forum, in colour. Wonder who drew this picture first, since it was not in the original movie. Maybe it was taken from an abandoned scene?
( I know they deleted two scenes in which the dwarfs were eating soup/building a bed for Snow White)

Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 10:52 pm
by pinkrenata
Yes, there was a Snow White Golden Book from the 1980s which features a picture of Snow White's mother ( I have the book as well!), but it is a reprint of the book that was originally published in 1948. This must have been a trend because I also have similar Cinderella and Alice in Wonderland books. In fact, I specifically hated my Cinderella book when I was little because the pictures looked nothing like the movie. I've always figured that the reasoning behind books not matching up with the movie has something to do with the illustrations being based on concept art, maybe even preceding the film itself by a year or two. Obviously the 1948 Snow White book would not fit that scenario, but who knows. Maybe that version is a reprint of an even older one. I'll do my research/keep my eyes open in antique stores. :tink: