poco wrote:I just read on Yahoo! that Big Fish beat out ROTK this past weekend. I know the two movies are battling it out right now because ROTK says it was number one but the polls are saying different.
The actual numbers are in now - and RotK beat out BF by about $400k.
Return of the King - $14.2 million,
Big Fish - $13.8 million. So the King still reigns, but the Fish put up a good fight!
Maerj wrote:It just opened wide here Friday, it was only in NY and LA before that. It looks good...there was only one Burton film that I thought sucked and that was Planet of the Apes. Bleech! Nice effect and make ups, but it seemed like there wasn't much plot and the ending was horrid!
Well, it was in a
limited release before - not exclusively NY and LA. In fact, all my friends and I went to see it on Dec. 26th, 'cause our favorite haunt was lucky enough to have it. That was the weekend they widened it from 6 to 124 screens - it
was a NY/LA exclusive for 2 weeks before that.
Now that it's
wide-wide, more people will have a chance to see this delightfully Burton-esque film. I like to entertain the thought of it being nominated for a Best Picture Oscar - but I dunno if there will be room in those 5 slots...
As for Burton in general (LOL - wasn't this a RotK thread? Maybe Luke should split it...), yes, I
lurve his stuff. It's all so twisted - in a
good kind of way. Nothing truly freaky or repulsive about it. But yeah -
Planet of the Apes was
bad. Me no likey. And I
still have no idea why he's "re-imagining"
Willy Wonka. Especially with Johnny Depp rumored to be Wonka himself. I mean, the guy does a silly whimsical character in
Pirates - can't we just leave it at that? No - he
must now be the Candy Master!
...and Tim Burton having used him several times before doesn't make it any more of an inspired choice... e_e I'd rather have seen Christopher Walken, if you wanna talk about uninspired type-casting - the guy's weird enough in real life to fit the role... LOL
That, and he "looks" more age-appropriate for Wonka. I know Depp is 40, but he still looks too "young" to be Wonka. Walken is 60 and shows it. Plus I've always seen Wonka, in both the book and the movie, as a man who looks old and acts young - it fits his character. Plus, Walken could pull off the eccentric, potentially frightening behavior of Wonka more effectively, I think. Depp just doesn't feel threatening enough - even when he
has played creepy characters.
Um... okay. I'll stop now before this tangent flies completely off the handle... LOL