DVDizzy Forum

disneyboy2022 did say that these were spoilers.

Prince Ali wrote:

Anthony wrote:If popular, the special will re-air on a 15 year cycle. YAY - Shrek 'til 2022!

I don't see what would make them automatically decide 15 seasons of Shrek. That's a bit odd.

Perhaps they'll just keep airing it until people stop watching. Or maybe it'll become like the Rudolph and Frosty films and become a Christmas tradition.

I think that's what ABC is hoping for. A new holiday special for the 21st century. A brand new Rudolph tradition.

I do find the Dronkeys cuter than the baby orges, but they are still cute.

And if you didn't want to be spoiled...next time, don't click on a link that says "SPOILER" and the b**** about it later.

Siren wrote:I do find the Dronkeys cuter than the baby orges, but they are still cute.

And if you didn't want to be spoiled...next time, don't click on a link that says "SPOILER" and the b**** about it later.

Agreed, and agreed. Dronkeys. Why didn't I think of that term before? They were my favorite part of Shrek 2.

I dont consider it a spoiler, if you see the new preview before Spiderman 3 they show 3 baby ogres

pap64 wrote:

numba1lostboy wrote: All the trailers have been hinting at a baby from the very beginning...

I know the baby hint was first seen in the trailers. But what I mean the actual surprise of seeing the babies for the first time is ruined.

You know, seeing the thrill of the scene for the first time.

Maybe they just want to avoid many heart attacks because of those ugly things

Prudence wrote:disneyboy20022 did say that these were spoilers.

Thanks for defending me.... That is why I put a warning possible spoiler... although its true pap64 if you went to the theaters you probably would have seen this anyway.... Unless you prefer not to see spider-man 3 and boycott it until shrek 3 comes out Just kidding

But I think what pap64 is saying is why did Dreamworks show the babies already.. Not an attack on me but rather a question of why Dreamworks showed them so soon.... I mean the baby carrige issuing gallons of puke at shrek was enough... They didnt need to show the Baby(s) or how many there were...

Does anybody know what the names of the babies are?

"One of us! One of us!"

Go to Walmart and they have a TON of toys of the triplets. So no one can blame disneyboy for spoilers. Blame corporate America. If they made Shrek toilet paper, people would buy it.

Do they have...diapers with the baby ogres printed on them?

If you go to IMDB they just call them baby ogres in the cast

what a family... ini mini miney Fiona and Shrek

why show the babies now? it's like the whole focus is going to the babies and none of it is going to Artie. the babies are cute like Fiona.
personaly i'm looking forward to the princess fighting part.
and don't worry it'll all end with Shrek 4, the special, and Puss In Boots.

I dont think number 4 will be the last, ifyou go on the shrek web page and look at the timeline there is a ? after #4

i think the babies are really cute, but they should not have shown them. it definitely does spoil the surprise. but i was really curious

Isidour wrote:what a family... ini mini miney Fiona and Shrek

Um, Isidour? That's called inevitable genetics; all families share inevitable genetics.

Give us the deffinition of inevitable genetics, I cant find any deff for it

-head meets desk-
Are you serious?! Mike, look up "inevitable" and look up "genetics." I simply wrote a three-syllable word after writing a four-syllable word!

of course I know that's genetic,for the pictures I can say that Shrek's genes compared to Fiona's would be more recesive or "less strong" considering that two of the three...ogres have red hair but I was just "naming" the green brats