DVDizzy Forum

yea she does Aurora Rose......and yea i think Pocahontas is a princess 2 but if ya take a look above sum ppl disagree!

DisneyFan 2000 wrote:Pocahontas ain't a princess... Though she is pretty sexy!

Lazario wrote:Um... how about : THEY ARE CARTOONS, THEY ARE NOT REAL... Maybe you people are cartoons as well.

Well, I don't know about others, but for me it's all in good fun. I also said to a friend of mine how hot Ariel was, and she was like: "But she's a cartoon... ". All in good fun. I'm sure it is for everyone else here too.

I believe she is an Indian Princess

Though I disagree with using the word "hot" to describe Disney princesses especially since I'm a hetrosexual female, I think the character of Aurora is quite visually appealing.

dear me....i'm straight 2.....buts its abit of fun! Just coz ur able to appreciate another females beauty......(yeah i no there cartoons b4 u all start!) but think u may have sum issues with ur sexuality there!

After much deliberation and controvery, Pocahontas and Mulan were both canonized into the Disney pantheon of princesses. Pocahontas is by every means a legitmate princess. My opinion of a Disney Princess is a female heroine who ends up in a royal line and who's film was a sizeable hit and/or eventual classic. (Sorry Kida and Eilonwy.) Mulan...well, I'll maintain the view that women of importance in Eastern lands could be referred to as princesses, but that's a stretch.

Oh, and none of the ones listed are the hottest, because that title goes to Pocahontas.

I'll just have to go with "Cinderella".

It's not about real people being sexier than cartoons, okay. It's not an uptight thing. It's that, we are people and forgive me if I'm sane enough that I believe we should find other people sexy. Seriously, things are getting sick in here.

1.Jasmine
2. (tie) Belle/Ariel
3.Sleeping Beauty (Aurora)

definitely Belle!!!

I'll try to imagine them as real life women, and the winner is..... Belle. She's just plain gorgeous! Second in line would be Jasmine, just look at them curves..lol

Anyone remember the episode of Friends where they made lists of five celebrities they'd sleep with and Chandler listed Jessica Rabbit?

Anyways, in terms of animated female characters that is the most visually appealing to the eyes...I'd have to say Belle.

And from the countless faces of each princess I've seen at MK, the hottest is definitely the southern Belle that sat next to me in the computer lab once. I could just drown in her accent...*rowwrr*

Escapay

Lazario wrote:Seriously, things are getting sick in here.

As I said, it's all in good fun. It all depends on how you approach this...

And if you were to be one of the last customers walking around in a shopping mall and saw a guy humping a mannequin, you're saying you'd laugh and think; "he's having fun" ? Let's just come to a point we can both agree on, never been anything wrong with masturbation. The problem a lot of people have with it, other than the sexual aspect, is that it presents an unrealistic form of sexual gratification. I don't feel that way, so this is not about me being uptight. It's perfectly healthy, and the fact that the person gratifying themselves is not procreating, means nothing. I think we can both agree, masturbation is healthy. Because it's a natural fantasy. Not anything like this lusting after drawings. Animated versions of people have none of the real elements of human attraction about them, other than appearence. There is no sense of intimacy, only a sort of disgusting doll / robot = inhuman quality about the artificial person. It's the same as saying blowup dolls make good life partners, forsaking all of the things a REAL person will give you.

This animation-phile thing falls into a different category. The one where now people are just being perverted, overtly. And everyone is taking this seriously, they're answering this assanine question with all honesty. And it's disturbing, completely disturbing. It's sick, it really is. Maybe not criminally sick, but it's not right at all. Wake up- how can we expect to get away with slapping people on the wrist for lusting after animals, corpses, and children, if now they're allowed to find pencils and paper sexy! We can't, it's as simple as that. This a boundry that, when crossed, is just not right. This is, in fact, sick.

Lazario being negative again, if you dont like the thread stay out

memnv wrote:if you dont like the thread stay out

No. And I think you can't stand the fact that you can't make me. So go deal with it and if you have nothing to say about the statement I'm making, you can stay out of it.

Lazario I think you're taking it a bit too serious for what it is.

I mean it's not a dangerous issue to society, it's saying what artwork you like. You can admit saying you like how a cartoon looks without actually *loving* it.

you love to complain, is that all that you know how to do mam. You have no reason to be complaining if someone thinks a cartoon character is hot, Jessica Rabbit was made to make you think she is hot. I think your jealous because it is a princess not a prince thread.

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:I mean it's not a dangerous issue to society

I can agree with you on that.

Timon/Pumba fan wrote:...it's saying what artwork you like. You can admit saying you like how a cartoon looks without actually *loving* it.

But here, I have to say - it's past that point now. The people here are expressing (with the exception of whoever said they were the heterosexual female) sexual attraction to an image with no human attributes other than the unrealistic, Barbie figure. It's an insult to real women, and to human nature. It's saying that animation will do everything a real person can, when a person chooses a drawing over real human form.

memnv wrote:I think your jealous because it is a princess not a prince thread.

I don't think you meant the sentence the way it came out, but that is probably really offensive to people like Lazario. It wasn't funny AT ALL.

It was directed at lazario so yes it was meant that way