Re: The Little Mermaid (Live-Action)
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2021 4:23 pm
I hope she's not Ariel's mother. Her mom also becoming human and living on land makes Ariel's dream and predicament less unique, special, and radical.
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
I think so.UmbrellaFish wrote:Are they filming the scene where Eric washes up ashore after the shipwreck?
That's an interesting theory, maybe you're right. But I think it's more likely Eric's family because they look worried about him. Well, at least Noma's character does.UmbrellaFish wrote:Could Eric find himself shipwrecked in a kingdom that is not his own?
Noma definitely stands out, doesn’t she? Her character seems most active in this scene and her costume is much more elaborate than anybody else’s. I really like the way her dress is moving in that picture.D82 wrote:That's an interesting theory, maybe you're right. But I think it's more likely it's Eric's family because they look worried about him. Well, at least Noma's character does.UmbrellaFish wrote:Could Eric find himself shipwrecked in a kingdom that is not his own?
That's true. That's why I'm not completely sure if the other two characters are part of the family or not. Maybe the old man is Grimsby, but do people who are not royalty wear that kind of sash he wears?UmbrellaFish wrote:Noma definitely stands out, doesn’t she? Her character seems most active in this scene and her costume is much more elaborate than anybody else’s.
You're right, Max should be in that scene too.UmbrellaFish wrote:And where is Max? They wouldn’t leave out Max would they???
I personally don't think Max is necessary to the plot, but I feel like Abu has been the only live-action animal that had prominent scenes. Bruno was cut, Lucifer only appeared in 4 scenes, and Rajah was barely around.UmbrellaFish wrote: And where is Grimsby? We know he was cast in the movie, but I guess he no longer finds the shipwrecked Eric? And where is Max? They wouldn’t leave out Max would they???
According to DisInsider, Grimsby is played by actor Jude Akuwudike. From pictures on the internet, he doesn’t look anything like the actor in these photos. Although until the casting is confirmed by Disney or in the trades, we should probably take this with a grain of salt even if it’s all we have to go on for now.D82 wrote:That's true. That's why I'm not completely sure if the other two characters are part of the family or not. Maybe the old man is Grimsby, but do people who are not royalty wear that kind of sash he wears?UmbrellaFish wrote:Noma definitely stands out, doesn’t she? Her character seems most active in this scene and her costume is much more elaborate than anybody else’s.
You're right, Max should be in that scene too.UmbrellaFish wrote:And where is Max? They wouldn’t leave out Max would they???
But Max is adorable, tsom.tsom wrote: I personally don't think Max is necessary to the plot, but I feel like Abu has been the only live-action animal that had prominent scenes. Bruno was cut, Lucifer only appeared in 4 scenes, and Rajah was barely around.
Maybe you're right.tsom wrote:maybe these are all courtiers and members of the nobility? King and Queens are not the only ones at court that dress stately. The Grand Duke and Captain wore nice costumes, and so did Jafar in Aladdin. Lumiere and Cogsworth wore nice outfits as well,
Yes, I noticed that too, but I think the DisInsider is most likely wrong about Noma's character being Carlotta, so they could be wrong about Grimsby too. I agree, we should take all the info that's not official with a grain of salt.UmbrellaFish wrote:According to DisInsider, Grimsby is played by actor Jude Akuwudike. From pictures on the internet, he doesn’t look anything like the actor in these photos. Although until the casting is confirmed by Disney or in the trades, we should probably take this with a grain of salt even if it’s all we have to go on for now.
I've now remembered the Grand Duke in Cinderella also wears a sash, so maybe that character could indeed be Grimsby or another member of the nobility and not necessarily a king.UmbrellaFish wrote:Re: the sash, I mean it’s American movie fairy tale royalty. We play fast and loose with the details haha. I think real royalty only wear sashes for formal occasions.
It’s funny you suggest the beginning of the climax scene Being altered and taking place on the beach, because that’s what they did in Kingdom Hearts IIDisney's Divinity wrote:There is the scene of the false wedding in the animated film where there are the group of aristocrats shocked at Ariel's voice returning and Ursula exploding out of the wedding dress. Perhaps they moved the fake wedding to the beach to put more focus on the sun setting in the ocean behind or something? Or perhaps because Ursula and Triton's confrontation will happen at the shore with the humans present instead of underwater where Eric has to go after Ariel alone. (And since, as brought up in this thread before, I think there will not be a Giant Ursula climax.) Yeah, it sounds so far like barely anything's going to be the same in this film. God, why even make remakes then? Why not make an original adaptation under one of the 5,000 companies they own now, Jesus.
Perhaps the movie is simply imitating the Broadway show and instead of a wedding taking place, there will be a singing competition before Ursula floods her way onto the beach at sunset.![]()
I suppose if they were to write a brother into the story for Eric, they might be changing the ending so that Ariel doesn't leave the ocean behind forever to be with Eric, but that they alternate back and forth underwater and on land. A brother, particularly an older brother, would mean Eric doesn't really have any real obligations and so he could go back and forth that way.
I think the scene being filmed in those images is most likely the one in which Eric is found on the shore after being rescued by Ariel, but I guess it could also be after the fake wedding and the climax with Ursula. Yes, that could maybe explain that outfit, if she really is Carlotta. It would also mean that part of the movie has also been changed and Ariel doesn't appear to Eric immediately after he wakes up on the shore.Disney's Divinity wrote:On second thought, the more I look at the picture, the more I can see the man with the sash being Grimsby. He and Carlotta did have a fairly intimate relationship towards one another, and played pseudo parental figures towards Eric. If this were a scene like the fake wedding or perhaps the real wedding, the dress there wouldn't be so weird on Carlotta then. She would be dressing better than usual at an event like that. That would also explain why there would be lesser maids standing so near to them.
I think it's possible they have taken some ideas from Kingdom Hearts. I know the production of Kingdom Hearts 3 was different from other games in the series because Lasseter was micromanaging it since it was the first time the series had used properties he had been involved with (Frozen, Tangled, etc.). He forced the KH people to work with the producers / directors from those films in making their worlds in KH3--for the films he had worked on, it didn't seem to be the case for the Hercules or PotC worlds. So the people at WDAS may have taken a few thoughts from their experience working with the Square Enix during that. Raya and the Last Dragon definitely felt very KH-inspired with the dark creatures coming out of the light, which had been fought over by the people. And of course Raya literally being called a princess of Heart.Patricier21 wrote: It’s funny you suggest the beginning of the climax scene Being altered and taking place on the beach, because that’s what they did in Kingdom Hearts IIIndeed, it seems as though Disney is taking more and more influence from Kingdom Hearts In some of their projects lately. The change in the climax to the live action Aladdin is also reminiscent of Kingdom Hearts I in more ways than one, Not only from Iago becoming a giant monster version of himself like a heartless, but more precisely like how the boss battle in the Aladdin world in Kingdom Hearts one it’s actually you battling Iago Who is Carrying the lamp. Rafiki Having another area similar to his tree Beside/within The side of pride rock On the lion guard being exactly what they did to His tree in Kingdom Hearts II. Even Gabby Gabby‘s plot to steal Woody‘s voice box in toy story four is essentially a Kingdom Hearts plot with her metaphorically trying to steal his heart [As a Sidenote directly related to this topic, It’s also more obviously reminiscent of Ursula trying to steal Ariel’s voice eh? Not to mention Woody want to escape his original world and Be part of the wider one with his true love
Oh, yes, I often think that was the case, too, that Triton would transform on special occasions when they would have a family get-together. I think they may just make it more explicit here in the dialogue so it doesn't seem so permanent when Ariel says by at the end to Triton.It’s also kind of funny like you’re suggesting about Ariel and Eric alternate between land and sea because when I was younger that’s what I kind of thought they were going to do, and I used to always think that during poor unfortunate souls that those Merpeople that were shown when Ursula was explaining her powers were Ariel and Eric, the latter As a merman. As another Sidenote, it may be Rob Marshall essentially doing/expanding upon what happened to the mermaid and human couple In his other Disney movie, Pirates of the Caribbean on stranger tides, and indirectly giving confirmation and will officially happened with that
I think so too.D82 wrote:I think the scene being filmed in those images is most likely the one in which Eric is found on the shore after being rescued by Ariel.
I hope not. That would be too Cinderella-like.D82 wrote:By the way, I wonder what that piece of cloth Eric is holding in several of the photos is, like for example here. Could it be something Ariel leaves behind before running away?
I take it you meant Eric transformed for family get together’sDisney's Divinity wrote:I think it's possible they have taken some ideas from Kingdom Hearts. I know the production of Kingdom Hearts 3 was different from other games in the series because Lasseter was micromanaging it since it was the first time the series had used properties he had been involved with (Frozen, Tangled, etc.). He forced the KH people to work with the producers / directors from those films in making their worlds in KH3--for the films he had worked on, it didn't seem to be the case for the Hercules or PotC worlds. So the people at WDAS may have taken a few thoughts from their experience working with the Square Enix during that. Raya and the Last Dragon definitely felt very KH-inspired with the dark creatures coming out of the light, which had been fought over by the people. And of course Raya literally being called a princess of Heart.Patricier21 wrote: It’s funny you suggest the beginning of the climax scene Being altered and taking place on the beach, because that’s what they did in Kingdom Hearts IIIndeed, it seems as though Disney is taking more and more influence from Kingdom Hearts In some of their projects lately. The change in the climax to the live action Aladdin is also reminiscent of Kingdom Hearts I in more ways than one, Not only from Iago becoming a giant monster version of himself like a heartless, but more precisely like how the boss battle in the Aladdin world in Kingdom Hearts one it’s actually you battling Iago Who is Carrying the lamp. Rafiki Having another area similar to his tree Beside/within The side of pride rock On the lion guard being exactly what they did to His tree in Kingdom Hearts II. Even Gabby Gabby‘s plot to steal Woody‘s voice box in toy story four is essentially a Kingdom Hearts plot with her metaphorically trying to steal his heart [As a Sidenote directly related to this topic, It’s also more obviously reminiscent of Ursula trying to steal Ariel’s voice eh? Not to mention Woody want to escape his original world and Be part of the wider one with his true love
![]()
Oh, yes, I often think that was the case, too, that Triton would transform on special occasions when they would have a family get-together. I think they may just make it more explicit here in the dialogue so it doesn't seem so permanent when Ariel says by at the end to Triton.It’s also kind of funny like you’re suggesting about Ariel and Eric alternate between land and sea because when I was younger that’s what I kind of thought they were going to do, and I used to always think that during poor unfortunate souls that those Merpeople that were shown when Ursula was explaining her powers were Ariel and Eric, the latter As a merman. As another Sidenote, it may be Rob Marshall essentially doing/expanding upon what happened to the mermaid and human couple In his other Disney movie, Pirates of the Caribbean on stranger tides, and indirectly giving confirmation and will officially happened with that
It's also possible the DisInsider was wrong and she's not playing Vanessa. Maybe Jessica Alexander is the actress who's playing her. I think she looks the part more.Sotiris wrote:Anyway, Coates' character doesn't seem to be part of the nobility. I thought they'd make Ariel's rival a princess like she was in the original fairytale, but it seems that won't be the case.
Who knows, maybe you're right about him being Grimsby. If Eric has parents in this version, there's no need for another father figure for him.Sotiris wrote:The other white guy is either the captain of the guard or Eric's younger brother. Maybe he's Grimsby and they made him younger and Eric's friend instead of an older father figure.
You make a good point. She does look the part more and DisInsider is far from reliable.D82 wrote:It's also possible the DisInsider was wrong and she's not playing Vanessa. Maybe Jessica Alexander is the actress who's playing her. I think she looks the part more.
That's true.D82 wrote:If Eric has parents in this version, there's no need for another father figure for him.