DVDizzy Forum

enigmawing wrote:I'm not sure why it's so important to label Elsa's hairstyle? Unless one is actually offended over the whole mullet thing.

Yeah, to me it's still hideous whether or not it's technically a "mullet."

Ursula DID have a mullet. Ursula was ugly and was a bad person ( well, a bad octopus/squid).

Ok, let's talk about the movie again for a change. Even if we have nothing very new to say. We'd like to have a new thing a day but that's not possible. We're like spoiled kids waiting for Santa Claus ( Santa Claus DOES NOT have a mullet by the way, i'm sure of that at least...)

Well, for example, personnaly, i would kill to know all the official songs titles NOW, just RIGHT NOW !!!!

I wonder if we will have some music featurettes soon, but maybe not about all the songs : i can feel some songs would very spoiling.

Lady Cluck wrote:This is the saddest debate I've ever seen.

at caring so much that people are saying your precious Elsa, a fictional cartoon character in a movie you haven't seen yet but are obsessed with for some reason, has a mullet. Chill the hell out. You're not Elsa's publicist.

Once again, I think I'll settle for an all-purpose to that.

You don't like my posts, feel free to skip over them. Or continue commenting on them regularly, if you wish.

This debate is a brand new kind of crazy the likes of which I haven't yet seen on this forum. Which is saying quite a lot. I'm glad Jennifer had the sense to see that.

I love this, Frozen isn't even out yet and this Elsa already has her own club of stalkers! I'd alert Idina Menzel to be careful once she walks out the street this November...

thedisneyspirit wrote:I love this, Frozen isn't even out yet and this Elsa already has her own club of stalkers! I'd alert Idina Menzel to be careful once she walks out the street this November...

This Frozen news/promo-drought really takes its toll on some of the people here...

SWillie! wrote:This debate is a brand new kind of crazy the likes of which I haven't yet seen on this forum. Which is saying quite a lot. I'm glad Jennifer had the sense to see that.

Agreed . . . I've been watching from the sidelines, wondering whether Jackoleen had returned and rebranded herself

But, if that were the case, I'm betting we'd have been exposed to confessions about her "non-mullet" fantasies by now . . .

Another interview with Peter Del Vecho from Bleeding Cool:

http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/09/25/ ... del-vecho/

I think there are intersting things in it, like his explanation of why they chose the title "Frozen"

Mooky wrote:This Frozen news/promo-drought really takes its toll on some of the people here...

You're telling me.

D82 wrote:I think there are intersting things in it, like his explanation of why they chose the title "Frozen"

Great interview, but the title stuff just screams PR to me. It's not like he's aloud to say "yeaaahhh, since Tangled seemed to work we decided we needed to copy it with the title, promotional materials, etc."

Should we be calling her Elsa Bowie now?

enigmawing wrote:

Mooky wrote:This Frozen news/promo-drought really takes its toll on some of the people here...

You're telling me.

What's funny is that aside from the dark roots, it's not that different.

enigmawing wrote:

Mooky wrote:This Frozen news/promo-drought really takes its toll on some of the people here...

You're telling me.

I snorted so loud it freaked out my cats.

enigmawing wrote:You're telling me.

I love it! She actually looks pretty good. The 80s look suits her!

SWillie! wrote:The title stuff just screams PR to me. It's not like he's aloud to say "yeaaahhh, since Tangled seemed to work we decided we needed to copy it with the title, promotional materials, etc."

Exactly.

Yes, he's kind of lying about the choice of the title...
And that "too dark Andersen original tale", again !!!!
What is dark about a little boy joining a mysterious snow queen in a castle and a little girl going to save her ??? NOTHING.

On another hand, what is very very DARK is : little girls raised apart, with one almost killing the other, forced to wear gloves, being alone, outcast, exiled, with parents dead in a storm, forbidden to express her feelings and to hug her beloved sister, then freezing her heart til she dies transformed in a cold block of ice before an evil prince tries to cut her head !!! THAT IS DARK, yes ( and i'm lovin it )

It's just a nonsense argument. The same, again.

SWillie! wrote:

D82 wrote:I think there are intersting things in it, like his explanation of why they chose the title "Frozen"

Great interview, but the title stuff just screams PR to me. It's not like he's aloud to say "yeaaahhh, since Tangled seemed to work we decided we needed to copy it with the title, promotional materials, etc."

I know that. I was going to write "excuse" instead of "explanation" in my sentence. I don't believe him either, like I didn't believe the excuses Tangled directors gave for the title change of Rapunzel. What seemed interesting to me about that is to hear what they invent to explain it.

I would have loved to see "Wreck it Ralph" turned into "Wrecked".

From http://movies.yahoo.com/photos/frozen-m ... 69134.html

She looks great!

And... the first comment on that picture is:

Need more princesses of color. I'm seeing repeats now in every Disney princess movie.

I feel like Disney will never be seen as an entertainment company, and more as an miracle company that satisfies everyone's needs and fixes all the problems we will in our world.

Disney is magic..