Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 12:15 am
Whoa too much information needed !Jules wrote:I hope Kristoff's hella hot. I want a male Disney character I can masturbate to.
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
Whoa too much information needed !Jules wrote:I hope Kristoff's hella hot. I want a male Disney character I can masturbate to.
You need even more information than that!?thelittleursula wrote:Whoa too much information needed !
I think I just peed a littleJules wrote:I hope Kristoff's hella hot. I want a male Disney character I can masturbate to.
Thats the same old story regarding Frozen. Every time someone posts "New Frozen artwork" we've already seen it. I wonder if Disney is getting a kick out of kick out of people wanting to see Frozen images.DisneyDude2010 wrote:^ that's already been posted.
Please look back before posting something. That got my hopes up!
Oh, I swore that no'one had posted this before. Either way, I'm sorry. But please don't offend me for making an honest mistake.DisneyDude2010 wrote:^ that's already been posted.
Please look back before posting something. That got my hopes up!
I never said anything "offending" in the first place? ....DisneyFan09 wrote:please don't offend me for making an honest mistake.
Source: http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movi ... n/1667373/What's up for Disney features next year? Another fairy tale, Frozen, which could be taken as a show of studio confidence or reliance on a sure bet. Like Tangled, it is loosely based on a classic story — The Snow Queen — about a clash between sisters that involves a journey across a treacherous frozen landscape.
"It's not a love story," assures Lasseter as he makes a case for upholding the studio's princess past. "I believe strongly that Disney needs to make these kinds of films. It is classically Disney, yet fresh and original for today's audiences. And not just for little girls."
Sounds about right. Could be pretty fresh since Disney don't often do anti-villains, the only previous example I can think of being Long John Silver. I only hope the snowmen don't usurp the role of villain, with the worst case scenario with them continuing to become a threat even after Elsa's presumed redemption.jazzflower92 wrote:I was thinking that they are trying to reinvent what a princess movie can be about.I mean a movie about the relationship between sisters could be interesting.Espically if there will be a villian who is possibly an antivillian.But yeah I could possibly see them downplaying the romance in favor of the sisterly relationship.Brave did it for the mother and daughter relationship maybe Frozen will do it for a sister relationship.
Romance might be a small subplot but the sibling relationship is the main focus.In fact I would be happy to see it.
We will see whats happens but I have a feeling that maybe Disney will put other elements from the original story into the movie in subtle ways.I am just glad this wasn't made in the early 2000's or this would have turned into a Shrek like comedy.qindarka wrote:Sounds about right. Could be pretty fresh since Disney don't often do anti-villains, the only previous example I can think of being Long John Silver. I only hope the snowmen don't usurp the role of villain, with the worst case scenario with them continuing to become a threat even after Elsa's presumed redemption.jazzflower92 wrote:I was thinking that they are trying to reinvent what a princess movie can be about.I mean a movie about the relationship between sisters could be interesting.Espically if there will be a villian who is possibly an antivillian.But yeah I could possibly see them downplaying the romance in favor of the sisterly relationship.Brave did it for the mother and daughter relationship maybe Frozen will do it for a sister relationship.
Romance might be a small subplot but the sibling relationship is the main focus.In fact I would be happy to see it.
(minor rant) I'm looking forward to the day when Disney doesn't feel the need to act so apologetic for doing a fairy tale again. I really miss when they played up the fact that these were based on classic tales and were not all "don't worry boys, this isn't going to be like Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast, we've changed the title and some plot lines to make it "cool"."It's not a love story," assures Lasseter as he makes a case for upholding the studio's princess past. "I believe strongly that Disney needs to make these kinds of films. It is classically Disney, yet fresh and original for today's audiences. And not just for little girls."
Couldn't agree more.DancingCrab wrote:I'm looking forward to the day when Disney doesn't feel the need to act so apologetic for doing a fairy tale again. I really miss when they played up the fact that these were based on classic tales and were not all "don't worry boys, this isn't going to be like Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast, we've changed the title and some plot lines to make it "cool".
Don't think they have really been changing plotlines to make it cool. Agreed about the titles. And rightly or wrongly (I say wrongly), the public has now lumped classic Disney movies into one big category where they are all homogenous "fairy tale princess movies" so I wouldn't blame Lasseter for the PR talk.DancingCrab wrote:(minor rant) I'm looking forward to the day when Disney doesn't feel the need to act so apologetic for doing a fairy tale again. I really miss when they played up the fact that these were based on classic tales and were not all "don't worry boys, this isn't going to be like Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast, we've changed the title and some plot lines to make it "cool"."It's not a love story," assures Lasseter as he makes a case for upholding the studio's princess past. "I believe strongly that Disney needs to make these kinds of films. It is classically Disney, yet fresh and original for today's audiences. And not just for little girls."
Absolutely. It's very annoying.Sotiris wrote:Couldn't agree more.DancingCrab wrote:I'm looking forward to the day when Disney doesn't feel the need to act so apologetic for doing a fairy tale again. I really miss when they played up the fact that these were based on classic tales and were not all "don't worry boys, this isn't going to be like Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast, we've changed the title and some plot lines to make it "cool".
Yeah, they have done a lot of damage to the perception of Disney movies in the public eye, even critics aren't immune. It is Disney's own fault really but I feel for the folks at WDAS and even Pixar (Brave) for having their their movies dismissed simply as 'princess movies' whatever that is supposed to mean. As if princess was a genre.thelittleursula wrote:I sort of blame the Princess Collection for it. They made those movies feel like they're only girls only, so yeah. Their fault.