Page 8 of 32

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 4:44 pm
by Luke
yoda_four wrote:I too am wondering that. Did BATBs sequels have the numerals on the spine?
Yes, it was for the Beauty and the Beast collection of feature film and DTV films.

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 6:43 pm
by DisneyVillains
I am pleased with the "final cover", but actually think that Aladdin's face looks more acurate in the first cover then in the later covers. Everything else I like so it really is not too bad. I am just happy that they are keeping a somewhat consistent look to the covers. They all look so great!

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 7:57 pm
by Kram Nebuer
Wasn't Lumiere on the spine for BATB? What's wrong with putting Genie on the spine if he was one of the main characters?

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 8:28 pm
by Mermaid Kelly
DisneyVillains wrote:they are keeping a somewhat consistent look to the covers. They all look so great!
Yes, I like that a lot and I hope they keep them similar looking :)

Also GREAT atavar DisneyVillains! Ursula is the coolest Disney villian!

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 10:44 pm
by DreamerQ18
Kram Nebuer wrote:Wasn't Lumiere on the spine for BATB? What's wrong with putting Genie on the spine if he was one of the main characters?
As a matter of fact you are right and now I am wondering why he was n there cause on the Lion King spine there is no numeral number and Simba is the one on the spine...werid :)

Posted: Wed Jun 09, 2004 10:49 pm
by MickeyMousePal
Um...over at Amazon Aladdin has the "First time on DVD" banner and not the Platinum Edition banner. Is it because Amazon is behind or something? I thought the final Aladdin DVD would have Platinum Edition.
I guess Amazon screw up. :lol:

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 7:53 am
by AwallaceUNC
Kram Nebuer wrote:Wasn't Lumiere on the spine for BATB? What's wrong with putting Genie on the spine if he was one of the main characters?
Yeah, so they can't be charged with inconsistency... and Genie is a little more qualified than Lumiere... but it should have been Belle & Beast on the spine and Aladdin on this one.

-Aaron

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:32 am
by DisneyVillains
Mermaid Kelly wrote: Also GREAT atavar DisneyVillains! Ursula is the coolest Disney villian!
Thanks! Ursula is by far my favorite Villain and character from Disney (right up there with Mickey)!

As for the picture on the spine... I agree that it should be the main character of the film. I don't really mind it so much but it would be nice. It seems that they are putting all the "fan favorite" characters on the spine of the DVDs (Lumiere, Genie. etc) However, I think it is wierd that they used the main characters on Snow White and Lion King and not the others. I think Bambi can almost be guaranteed to be on the spine.

Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:22 pm
by Kram Nebuer
DisneyVillains wrote:As for the picture on the spine... I agree that it should be the main character of the film. I don't really mind it so much but it would be nice. It seems that they are putting all the "fan favorite" characters on the spine of the DVDs (Lumiere, Genie. etc) However, I think it is wierd that they used the main characters on Snow White and Lion King and not the others. I think Bambi can almost be guaranteed to be on the spine.
Maybe it skips every other release :lol: . I bet Bambi will be on the spine of its DVD and Gus or Jaq will be on the spine for Cinderella Platinum Edition.

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 1:23 am
by DreamerQ18
Kram Nebuer wrote:
DisneyVillains wrote:As for the picture on the spine... I agree that it should be the main character of the film. I don't really mind it so much but it would be nice. It seems that they are putting all the "fan favorite" characters on the spine of the DVDs (Lumiere, Genie. etc) However, I think it is wierd that they used the main characters on Snow White and Lion King and not the others. I think Bambi can almost be guaranteed to be on the spine.
Maybe it skips every other release :lol: . I bet Bambi will be on the spine of its DVD and Gus or Jaq will be on the spine for Cinderella Platinum Edition.
Whoa I was thinking the same thing how it skips every realse or it could a be a new trend and maybe thumper or Flower will be on the Bambi spine.

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 12:53 pm
by Disneykid
Well, if the pattern is true, then Bambi would actually be on the cover of his movie's spine, with Gus or Jaq on Cinderella's (like Kram said). I really hope this isn't the case, though, because it really does bug me to see sidekicks on the spine of a movie's cover, ESPECIALLY when the film's title is that of the main character (Aladdin, Bambi, Cinderella, etc.).

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 1:57 pm
by StewMc
Have to say, the Aladdin in the most recent image looks absolutely nothing like the character in the film!!

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 4:15 pm
by Scabbie
On the Dutch DVD cover of Beauty and the Beast Lumiere wasn't on the spine. Belle and the Beast are on that spine.

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 5:00 pm
by DreamerQ18
Scabbie wrote:On the Dutch DVD cover of Beauty and the Beast Lumiere wasn't on the spine. Belle and the Beast are on that spine.
Thats werid is this the Dutch Beauty and The Beast realse equivalent to the Platitnium edition?

Posted: Fri Jun 11, 2004 11:13 pm
by Scabbie
Well, we had two versions over here. A 2-disc (that one doesn't have a spine) and a 1-disc.

Here a picture of the one disc:
http://disneyinfo.nl/images/dvd/classic ... ics032.jpg

And here of the two disc:
http://disneyinfo.nl/images/dvd/classic ... ics033.jpg

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 10:30 am
by enjoy
Since the Disney people are singing "Whole New World" I wonder if there is gonna be a Disney Mania 3. I hope so! I like to hear the songs sung in another way, it doesnt mean they are messing up the original, its not like thats the only version thats left and they are gonna replace the original, they are just singing it their way. I like to hear the reinventions of the songs myself!

I can see you people here dont like change much...

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:29 am
by Sulley
I personally think the "First Time On DVD" banner looks tacky. I don't mind them having it, but it could look a lot nicer. I also noticed that this is the first title in a while that does not say "Walt Disney Pictures Presents". It has reverted back to the simple "Walt Disney" that was displayed on the DVDs of Tarzan, The Little Mermaid, and all the gold collection titles.

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:43 am
by Jens
Sulley wrote:I personally think the "First Time On DVD" banner looks tacky. I don't mind them having it, but it could look a lot nicer. I also noticed that this is the first title in a while that does not say "Walt Disney Pictures Presents". It has reverted back to the simple "Walt Disney" that was displayed on the DVDs of Tarzan, The Little Mermaid, and all the gold collection titles.
Well the cover with "First Time on DVD" will not be used, so there will be a "Walt Disney Pictures Present" above the logo.. Look at the final art:

Image

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 11:46 am
by rodis
The cover looks horrible, but I have no doubt it's gonna change (for the better, I hope). First, the "First time..." banner is very unnecessary - why is it important to note "Aladdin" is first time on DVD?!

Second, Aladdin and Jasmine look laughably ugly! I seriously thought it was some sort of a joke when I first saw it. The drawing looks rough and not aesthetic AT ALL!

Thirdly, they should leave the "Walt Disney Pictures Presents" there! If they started it in the first 3 releases, they should continue with it.

EDIT: OMG! LOL, I sent the reply and then I saw the final cover LMAO!
Well, two wishes have been granted... But now Aladdin and Jasmine look better I must add. OK, I'm pleased enough.

Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2004 1:36 pm
by yoda_four
Even though I think we've all discussed this enough to death.... "Walt Disney Pictures Presents" should be included on ALL the Disney films after Walt's death. The movies from his lifetime should say "Walt Disney's ------". Something like Tarzan definitely should not have that title included on the cover, whereas like was done with Sleeping Beauty, Alice, Fantasia, Snow White, etc. it should be present.