DVDizzy Forum

Posted: **Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:20 pm**

No matter how well this film does, Disney still needs the creative minds of Pixar and Pixar still needs the money bags of Disney. It is a perfect relationship.

Also...

A NY theater played a film with a suicide in it instead of Chicken Little. Everyone went crazy.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/story/3 ... 9144c.html

Posted: **Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:23 pm**

I saw it yesterday. It wasn't bad..it was watchable, but it was far too quick-paced for me. The character design was nice, along with the 3D stuff, but it just wasn't my style. I prefer movies that are more..serious.

Posted: **Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:17 pm**

Ugh- I really want to see this. I feel so out of the loop.

ckdish wrote:No matter how well this film does, Disney still needs the creative minds of Pixar and Pixar still needs the money bags of Disney. It is a perfect relationship.

Do you mean that Disney needs Pixar for CGI animated features or just in general?

-Aaron

Posted: **Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:18 pm**

Kenai wrote:Oh, Isidour, according to Yahoo! Movies, Chicken Little also debuted at no.1 in Mexico as well.

I know,it had an excelent cast on the Dub like Kalimba(who made ten years ago the voice of simba), Xavier Lopez "Chabelo" and I think that Natalia Lafourcade or someother gal...

Dvdjunkie, they did passed one trailer(that unfortunately I haven´t found on the internet) of Bambi 2, at least here in Mexico.
It maked me wonder also, because they didn´t announced it would come as a DVD releaase, so maybe exist the posibility that Bambi 2 make its first appearance here on the theaters

Posted: **Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:25 pm**

Isidour, so they actually used a whole new set of voices for the dub? Really? Interesting. Will the Mexico dub be used throughout the rest of Latin America? Who else's voices were in it? Anyone famous from Mexico besides the ones you mentioned?

Posted: **Mon Nov 07, 2005 7:31 pm**

for the dub of Bambi, I really don´t know the names and I didn´t recognized any. But is shure that they´ll use new voices totally because any of them were the sames of the movie and many people of the original cast are very old, or in the case of Carlos Petrel, the Great Prince of the Forest, passed away long ago.

Anyway, the names I posted were from the Chiken little cast

Posted: **Mon Nov 07, 2005 8:58 pm**

AwallaceUNC wrote: Do you mean that Disney needs Pixar for CGI animated features or just in general?

-Aaron

Both, mostly for CGI animated features. Disney has lost its touch, it needs the creative power of Pixar.

Posted: **Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:26 am**

dvdjunkie

Just one more reason why I think the "Star Wars Movies in 3-D" will be a total waste of time.

Is this something that is in the works? I personally love a good 3D movie and Star Wars would be great in that format.

Please inform me of any other info you have!

thanks,
T.J.

Posted: **Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:24 pm**

ckdish wrote:Both, mostly for CGI animated features. Disney has lost its touch, it needs the creative power of Pixar.

You may be right as far as CGI features go. There really isn't enough to judge their abilities in that arena yet; or at least not for me, as I haven't seen CL yet.

There's no denying the incredible creative power of Pixar, and it's reminiscent of (and inspired by) what was once found at Disney... not that long ago. I'm not at all prepared to hand animation over to Pixar on a silver platter, though, nor invite Pixar to be involved with every animated Disney outing. There is hope for Disney yet, and even traditional animation. Rapnuzel seems promising.

-Aaron

Posted: **Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:37 pm**

Kenai wrote:Isidour, so they actually used a whole new set of voices for the dub? Really? Interesting. Will the Mexico dub be used throughout the rest of Latin America? Who else's voices were in it? Anyone famous from Mexico besides the ones you mentioned?

Well it's not like all the actors know Spanish or French to make the movie French or Spanish. So they bring in other actors who can speek Spanish or French( or whatever language) to dub over the original voice. It's kind of funny though because sometimes the voices don't follow their mouths so their mouths are closed and you still hear what they're saying. But hey they do a good job though so that's kept at a minimum.

Posted: **Tue Nov 08, 2005 6:41 pm**

AwallaceUNC wrote:I'm not at all prepared to hand animation over to Pixar on a silver platter, though, nor invite Pixar to be involved with every animated Disney outing.

I agree. But Disney needs Pixar's good films to balance out their own bad in-house films. Otherwise, their reputation dies, if it hasn't already. I see them more in the market for business instead of art. What they need is a balance of the two. They aren't alone in that folly, however. Just look at this year's summer films.

Posted: **Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:36 pm**

I haven't seen this yet, but kinda heard mixed reviews.
I am hoping it is good!

Posted: **Tue Nov 08, 2005 7:51 pm**

Papa Bear wrote:dvdjunkie
Just one more reason why I think the "Star Wars Movies in 3-D" will be a total waste of time.
Is this something that is in the works? I personally love a good 3D movie and Star Wars would be great in that format.

Please inform me of any other info you have!

thanks,
T.J.

ILM converted Chicken Little over to 3D, so I am sure they are already working on Star Wars. Lucas was saying he'd like to release them in 3D for the 30th anniversary.

Posted: **Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:57 pm**

thomashton wrote: Let's also not forget the cost to transfer it to 3D. I understand that cost is about 7 million or so and they didn't do it until late in the game. Does the 60M$ or so of production costs include the 3D transfer?

Marketing costs are also amazingly high. With all the coverage they're trying to give this movie I'm sure it's crazy how much they're spending. I heard it was about 40M$ in marketing costs alone for the Cinderella DVD release. How much are they spending to promote a dying feature animation department and bring it back to life? Probabaly at least as much. I wouldn't be surprised if they needed to make 100M$ to recoup all of the costs of the film. Then, DVD, merchandising etc etc is all gravy.

Lets hope they didn't bet the bank.... I would think Disney would be smarter than to spend themselves into a precarious situation on one movie. they are making and putting out movies all year long and have seen alot of dismal results so I would think they are somewhat judicious on spending. In fact, I am thinking from just watching the last 3 releases (and you guys have watched far more movied than I go down the tubes or have very limited box office results) that they must somehow make the money on the back end - videos/DVDs? Otherwise they would have bankrupted long ago.

Posted: **Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:40 am**

And I have a lot of things to say. Better resume those in one single image:

Posted: **Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:22 pm**

Issues of spelling aside, let us know what you think of the film AFTER you have seen it in this thread, already dedicated to viewer reaction/anticipation:

http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/vie ... hp?t=11305

Posted: **Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:44 pm**

ok sorry, I'm rather new to this site.

Posted: **Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:48 pm**

HaHa! That's pretty funny! I have no doubt that's the way Mickey is feeling right about now.

Posted: **Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:03 pm**

giagia wrote:ok sorry, I'm rather new to this site.

Don't sweat it. Just remember to see if someone else has posted something similar before starting a new thread and we can all live in happy fluffy land together.

Posted: **Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:44 pm**

And re-read your post before submitting making sure all your spelling is correct and your grammar is in line.

I have already seen "Chicken Little" four times and plan on seeing it at least once more before waiting for the DVD release.

DVDizzy Forum

Chicken Little Discussion

Chicken Little: I see the horror film today.