DVDizzy Forum

But not in the second US trailer, and I only recall her being named "Rapunzel" in the Behind the Scenes featurettes. What's really surprising is that they're doing it for a Disney Channel featurette.

New stuff...or more of the same really

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A5d2OBO1wNQ?fs ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A5d2OBO1wNQ?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

New video from the facebook page about the hair, nothing new

Well, I think there's a bit more Menken music in the background there.

^ I had the same thought since it sounds significantly celtic to me.

Great signature, ajmrowland!

Tristy wrote:Well, I think there's a bit more Menken music in the background there.

Yeah and it was about time.

Mr. Psycho wrote:^ I had the same thought since it sounds significantly celtic to me.

Especially the last part did. But I can't wait to hear more.

I wonder if the tune was from a song or it was from a score cue.

It sounds like it could be the inn song.

Tristy wrote:It sounds like it could be the inn song.

It could be.

Well, I'm glad that the hair turned out the way it did. You'd think 10 years of advancing technology past Monsters, Inc. it'd be much easier to do than it is now.

That first hair test wasnt exactly great(looked a little flat). it seems the filmmakers thought so too and changed it.

Mr. Psycho wrote:^ I had the same thought since it sounds significantly celtic to me.

Great signature, ajmrowland!

Thanks!

And it's totally Menken Music.

Dear Disney Enthusiasts,

Thank you for the updates, the photos, etc.

You're so lucky, Poody! I think that Donna Murphy is super cool!

I really think that "Tangled" will be an incredible movie!

Do any of you think that the death of traditional animation is upon us? I certainly hope that traditional animation will not die, and that it'll be even better during the future than it was in "The Princess and the Frog".

Thank you in advance for your replies.

Do any of you think that the death of traditional animation is upon us? I certainly hope that traditional animation will not die, and that it'll be even better during the future than it was in "The Princess and the Frog".

Thank you in advance for your replies.

Good question. Unfortunately I can't give a specific answer, but I really hope now that traditional animation will die - if not, I'm gonna kill myself, lol. I love that kind of animation

DisneyFan09 wrote:

Do any of you think that the death of traditional animation is upon us? I certainly hope that traditional animation will not die, and that it'll be even better during the future than it was in "The Princess and the Frog".

Thank you in advance for your replies.

Good question. Unfortunately I can't give a specific answer, but I really hope now that traditional animation will die - if not, I'm gonna kill myself, lol. I love that kind of animation

I don't think it'll ever die, honestly. People still paint on canvases and on computers right?

ajmrowland wrote:Well, I'm glad that the hair turned out the way it did. You'd think 10 years of advancing technology past Monsters, Inc. it'd be much easier to do than it is now.

That first hair test wasnt exactly great(looked a little flat). it seems the filmmakers thought so too and changed it.

Mr. Psycho wrote:^ I had the same thought since it sounds significantly celtic to me.

Great signature, ajmrowland!

Thanks!

And it's totally Menken Music.

It depends on how the hair is used. In Monsters Inc. Sulley's hair didn't play a role in the store, but Sulley manipulated it in different ways. He didn't take it off like a coat or used it as a weapon. Rapunzel, however, does, and with that comes different things like weight, physics, animation and speed, as well as interaction with other objects and characters. So its something that is more complex to animated and I can see why they would have issues with it despite the technology being advanced.

Regarding Tangled being the death of 2D animation, it depends on how that does at the box office. If its a bigger hit than Princess and the Frog then we might have a problem. If it isn't then that's a whole nother can of worms to deal with.

DisneyFan09 wrote:

Do any of you think that the death of traditional animation is upon us? I certainly hope that traditional animation will not die, and that it'll be even better during the future than it was in "The Princess and the Frog".

Thank you in advance for your replies.

Good question. Unfortunately I can't give a specific answer, but I really hope now that traditional animation will die - if not, I'm gonna kill myself, lol. I love that kind of animation

That kind of opinion is not safe to express here.

ajmrowland wrote:

DisneyFan09 wrote: Good question. Unfortunately I can't give a specific answer, but I really hope now that traditional animation will die - if not, I'm gonna kill myself, lol. I love that kind of animation

That kind of opinion is not safe to express here.

I didn't meant it litterally.

Is Dreamwork Movies more popular than Disney Movies?

I was on Facebook and Dreamwork's Megamind has more "Like" than Disney's Tangled.

As of right now:
Tangled: 19,064
Megamind: 19,145

If you have a Facebook "Like" Disney's Tangled. I already did.

http://www.facebook.com/DisneyTangled

Frankly, I have yet to see much to like about Megamind. I mean, how many of those ppl just "like" it for Will Ferrell and Tina Fey?

I became a fan, and sent the page to my friends.

pap64 wrote:I became a fan, and sent the page to my friends.

I became a fan myself.