Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:57 pm
^ There's also a Hercules edition...
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
Yep, I have that version! I have also seen the version posted on the previous page in the library, though the cover for it is actually the same as the hardback edition, despite it being a paperback.blackcauldron85 wrote:^ There's also a Hercules edition...
That and Jordin Sparks is an actual recording artist.fatcake wrote:I have to admit that the music video is gonna be way better than snow whites cause the mv doesnt look that cheap as sw's mv
hmm... is she supposed to be the Beast?Matt wrote:Here are some screen caps of Jordin Sparks - "Beauty and the Beast" Music Video:
People still buy them though, so financially, they don't really hurt the company.Wonderlicious wrote:Seriously, though. Can't Disney just not re-release their sequels? They've come close to completely ruining their reputation, so why bring them out again?
It's good that Disney got a real singer to sing a classic song.Matt wrote:Here are some screen caps of Jordin Sparks - "Beauty and the Beast" Music Video:
I think she looks really pretty and I am sure she is gonna bring a new classic version to this song! I cannot wait.![]()
I am to siked about this Blu-ray!
It's tough to make great films within Disney when the ones they distribute from Studio Ghibli and Pixar are so much better.Timon/Pumbaa fan wrote:Frankly, television and even our beloved Pixar are more "responsible" for lack of interest in Disney's current animated films. Just compare the almost non-existent hype for PATF to the hype for Up or any Pixar film.
that sentence doesn't even make any sense...magicalwands wrote:It's tough to make great films within Disney when the ones they distribute from Studio Ghibli and Pixar are so much better.
There's no comparison. They're simply too different. Plus, PATF is not one of Disney's best, and i personally think Disney shouldn't of destroyed such a wonderful story and make a more fitting story for the black princess. Cars on the other hand was very good movie. Don't you agree?PatrickvD wrote:that sentence doesn't even make any sense...magicalwands wrote:It's tough to make great films within Disney when the ones they distribute from Studio Ghibli and Pixar are so much better.
Also, Cars and Earthsea, how do those compare against The Princess and the Frog? It's relative.
Why? Because she isn't a anirexic size 0 and she doesn't look like a walking stick and she doesn't do drugs?! Hmmmm!PatrickvD wrote:hmm... is she supposed to be the Beast?Matt wrote:Here are some screen caps of Jordin Sparks - "Beauty and the Beast" Music Video:
Matt wrote:Why? Because she isn't a anirexic size 0 and she doesn't look like a walking stick and she doesn't do drugs?! Hmmmm!PatrickvD wrote: hmm... is she supposed to be the Beast?
If she was a size 0 he wouldn't be saying that. Yes it is ugly lol, but it stands out more because she is thick.SWillie! wrote:Matt wrote: Why? Because she isn't a anirexic size 0 and she doesn't look like a walking stick and she doesn't do drugs?! Hmmmm!
Ummm... I'm pretty sure he was referring to the hideous (furry? feather?) dress.
Jordin Sparks is beautiful though IMO! Sure she is thick but that doesn't make her look ugly!UmbrellaFish wrote:Yeah, that dress is just butt-ugly.
Mmm, no, I'm pretty sure someone would still call it an ugly dress then. A bad dress is a bad dress, be it size zero or size sixteen.Matt wrote:If she was a size 0 he wouldn't be saying that. Yes it is ugly lol, but it stands out more because she is thick.