Page 7 of 8
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 8:54 pm
by Escapay
chaychay102royal wrote:
I know your name isn't really Bree, but I couldn't think of anything else to call you.
LOL, try Escapay. I always sign off at the bottom of my posts (like Aaron).
Escapay (see?)
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 9:12 pm
by MinnieMe
Side note: I had a little chat with Marcia Cross on a train to NYC in April of 2000! I recognized her because my mom had been a big fan of... was it Melrose Place? Didn't think she'd ever get famous again! Very happy to see her doing so well on DHW
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:20 pm
by chaychay102royal
MinnieMe wrote:Side note: I had a little chat </a>with Marcia Cross on a train to NYC in April of 2000! I recognized her because my mom had been a big fan of... was it Melrose Place? Didn't think she'd ever get famous again! Very happy to see her doing so well on DHW
Cool! I like her red hair (anybody who has read enough of my messages knows that I love red hair).
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:24 pm
by chaychay102royal
I notice DisneyHollywood hasn't been on today.
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:09 pm
by goofy108
chaychay102royal wrote:I notice DisneyHollywood hasn't been on today.
Unfortanetly (*Cough*Cough*),
DisneyHollywood has been gone for quite a while now. It sure was a short visit!
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:15 pm
by Zoltack
goofy108 wrote:chaychay102royal wrote:I notice DisneyHollywood hasn't been on today.
Unfortanetly (*Cough*Cough*),
DisneyHollywood has been gone for quite a while now. It sure was a short visit!
Yeah she was going post crazy then stopped. Like she had 50 posts in 2 days.
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:30 pm
by Isidour
maybe he just want the avatar
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:46 pm
by Zoltack
Isidour wrote:maybe he just want the avatar
But if she wanted an avatar don't you think she would of got one instantly after 50 post.
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:50 pm
by Isidour
she didn´t?
Posted: Tue May 03, 2005 5:54 pm
by chaychay102royal
No. She never used an avatar. I even sent her a private message about it, and she totally ignored it.
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 1:27 pm
by Lars Vermundsberget
I never saw the word "avatar" until I started using this forum.
Posted: Wed May 04, 2005 3:55 pm
by chaychay102royal
Avatars are used commonly on any website with a forum. Neopets even makes a big fuss about "a new avatar's out" and then the people on there have to do something on the website to get the avatar.
No More Hand Drawn Movies?
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:30 pm
by jamminjake245
Is it true that there will be no more hand drawn Disney movies? Say it ain't so! Does that mean they will all be CG (The Incredibles, Shrek, Shrek 2, Toy Story, Toy Story 2, Toy Story 3, etc)
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:45 pm
by Pasta67
There's already a
thread on this. There are a few more, but I don't want to look for them.
The future is looking bleak for hand-drawn movies, which is a terrible loss for many, including me. It's basically Eisner's fault; he thinks that hand-drawn movies aren't good anymore just because they're not CGI, which proves how blind he is.
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:53 pm
by Timon/Pumbaa fan
Pasta67 wrote:
It's basically Eisner's fault; he thinks that hand-drawn movies aren't good anymore just because they're not CGI, which proves how blind he is.
I think Mr. Toad said it best: "It is not the fault of Eisner. It is not the fault of Iger.It is the fault of people who buy the movie tickets and DVDs."
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:51 pm
by Tolhurst
after a few 3d failures, they will produce a 2d film if only to gain the publicity from doing so.
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 8:59 pm
by jamminjake245
Hopefully. CG is nice, but nothing can match up to hand drawn animation featured in the Lion King, Aladdin, etc.
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:16 pm
by chaychay102royal
Tolhurst wrote:after a few 3d failures, they will produce a 2d film if only to gain the publicity from doing so.
Well, um, currently Disney hasn't experienced an awful lot of failures in the 3D department. It will be quite a while, I believe, before the American public gets bored of Disney's 3D films.
Posted: Sun Aug 14, 2005 9:17 pm
by Zoltack
Well if they balanced it out 50/50 I wouldn't mind. But I'm seeing more CG previews than I am animation preview. That suggest to me that animation is becoming extinct. But it better not or some heads are gonna fly. I mean hand drawn animation is what made Disney so great in the past, you'd think they use the same method that will keep it popular. Unforturnatly, now they're running out of creative ideas (not saying The Incredibles wasn't creative). But all I see know is movie's with animals (birds actually) and it's totally unrealistic, and sequels to classic movies (I think we had enough of that). So basically what I'm saying is that they need some movies that have some realistisity in it and not be CG and actually have a good story behind it.
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2005 7:31 am
by Isidour
well, I understand that, because as we have seen, the human character isn´t the CGI´s best work
They could do super real humans like they did on Final Fantasy but how long would this movie take? or they could do it Shrek 2-like, but here again, is Dreamworks...
anyway, If they do better animals than the ones f "Shark tale" or however it calls that horrible movie with the weird yellow and blue fish