Disney Duster wrote:Well Slave2moonlight, because I'm looking out for you, I'm going to say what I honestly feel it sounds like, even though you may feel differently, and may not like it. It sounds...like its possible...that she is excited for you just because she wants to be friends, and you're a really good friend to her. She said to move on, once, and she said she didn't want to date you anymore when she got back with her boyfriend. She says that she needs to be comfortable with someone to fall in love, so...did she get comfortable very fast with her schizo boyfriend? And how does she still get nervous for you when she is clearly not in full-on love and she spent so many previous times with you and knows you and clicked with you so well? This must be about one of the most timid girls ever who cares more about security than anything or she's not being fully honest with herself or you.
Well, the thing is, she IS very timid with this kind of thing. I get the impression she expects the guy to be the aggressive one (as most women probably do), and she is a very timid girl in general. I have thought over several possibilities, including that she only wants to be friends. The problem is, she has sent out both types of signals, sometimes on the same dates. Honestly, I get the impression she is just trying to be very, very careful about everything, partly because of bad experiences she has had already, including with the guy she is currently living with. We actually, finally went out again today, and it all went very nicely, but I still got both kinds of signals. It does read very much though like she is just worried about trusting another guy. But, the way I see it, she knows very well how I feel about her, so if she wants to flat out end things, she can. I realize she sent me packing once, but she also changed her tune. She knows, though, that my interest in her is not a "just friends" kind of thing. And, even today, we have talked about sharing an apartment together. She is just very unsure, and even says it's because of her experience living with the guy she is currently living with. She said she was planning to get her own place when the lease was up, and I said, "That's cool, I just didn't know you could afford your own place (as in, paying for a place without a roommate)," and she said she could, but she also then said, "but, maybe we could," because I don't seem like the "angry" type. So, I still get the vibe she is just very, very cautious. She has told me of some bad dating experiences she has had, so I can understand that. She's probably not "in love" with me at the moment, but I believe that she might not really be opened up to love at the moment. If you're not ready to trust anyone at all, I believe that's going to get in the way, and I can understand her not quite being ready to trust me 100 percent yet. We have had some big gaps in seeing each other, and the time in which we had several dates in a row still only went over the course of a month or so. But, yeah, things went well today, er, last night, and I expect to see her again over the weekend. I kinda think she expected me to kiss her goodnight tonight, and again I didn't really catch it till it was too late. I kinda went into tonight thinking I should not try anything since we hadn't seen each other in so long, but... I might have goofed up there, ha. I hope not. Maybe I'll get another chance if we do make it to Beauty and the Beast this weekend. In different ways, and sometimes the same ways, we are both very timid.
Disney Duster wrote:What do you mean when you say you don't believe "love has to be instantly recognized by both people"? You mean you don't think she recognizes the love while you do? If she's falling in love...she should know.
Aaaah, doesn't always work that way. You gotta realize that it can work all different ways. But, I don't remember what I was talking about when I said that, and I'm too lazy to go back and read it right now, ha. Maybe I was talking about being open to love. Like, what I just said a minute ago. I am like 100 percent sure that I am more open to falling in love than she is, and I believe that can cause one person to fall faster than another. And, yeah, that other might not fall at all, but they might. No, I DO NOT agree that it has to happen simultaneously. I think some of these ideas (and I don't mean this to offend at all) are a little more on the idealistic side than reflecting real-life. I love the Disney movies too, but they are unquestionably idealistic (and at the same time, not; for example, nobody cares what happens to someone like LaFou; he never gets to fall in love, and if he does, it would probably have to be a girl who looks just like him as a rule; and the end of Enchanted didn't make me feel much better, because that was unrealistic too). Then again, even in the Disney movies, there are examples of one character falling in love before the other one does, or before the other realizes it (like with Ariel and Eric; actually, their whole situation was really confusing; Aladdin and Jasmine might be a better example; He was smitten over her first, if I recall).
Disney Duster wrote: I do however agree that two people must work to get their situations lined up right to be able to be together...I actually agree with a lot of things you said about not waiting for love and it not being a Disney movie, but something that's also like a Disney movie is waiting and pining for someone with a lot of hope instead of reading things more realistically which perhaps you are doing. Realistically, people that are good for each other should fall in love about equally and around the same time, don'tcha think? It makes sense. Disney movies do have that point. Even though I am in love with someone who isn't with me, I'm just not as hopeful for it as you sound. I suppose I'm doing the same thing as you now that I think about it, I'll keep trying to get with them...I'm just going to give up sooner I think if not much happens.
Well, I don't think what I'm doing is the same as waiting and pining because I am actually going out on dates with her and trying to see where it will lead. I think waiting around pining for someone not interested in you would only count if you weren't getting any dates with the person anymore, or if things weren't progressing. If things don't progress or she stops showing any interest, I certainly will eventually TRY to move on. She hasn't gotten to the point of not showing any interest anymore though, and the thing about back when she told me she was back with her boyfriend and I should move on, well, I still don't know why that happened out of nowhere, but I have to tell you that just before that, she was acting very much like she was falling as much in love with me as I fell with her, and that's probably what keeps me after her so strongly as long as she is still willing to go out. I don't know what happened with the sudden turn around, maybe I announced my love too fast, and because I'm older, she thought I might try to propose next or something. I honestly think that's a possibility. There are plenty of things to be skiddish about. I kinda got a vibe that she found it weird that I had never tried another physical with her too. But, anyway, I can't properly describe how, but for a while there, she was nearly as smitten with me as I was with her, and I could just see it in the way she acted and even moved. And even that fact could have scared her a little. So, right now, I'm just trying to see if I can respark that attitude in her. But, this current emergency need I have right now for an apartment and job is complicating things now too. I may have to be on the other side of town for a while starting next week, which sucks, because it is a LOOONG way away...
As for the whole thing about it being realistic in Disney films that people who were good for each other would fall in love with each other at the same time, I sorta talked about that before, but I really believe that most of the time one person falls in love before the other. I don't agree that it is necessary for it to happen at the same time because I believe it has to do with how open you are to falling in love and also how much you share about yourself with the other person and they with you, which doesn't always turn up in equal amounts. It's like, while I don't believe in love at first sight in the most literal, Disney sense, I do believe you can fall in love with someone from afar and without them knowing you, IF you know enough about them. Actually, have you ever seen the movie, "The Shop Around the Corner"? If not, you really should. I highly recommend you see that one. It's a good example of how one person can know that they love someone before the other person knows it. It's not a perfect example of MY situation, but it is a great example of how you can see someone every day and they can be the right person for you, but you don't see it because you don't know enough about them. Of course, some people could read it the wrong way and think it means that people who don't get along are a good match. I don't agree with that and don't think that is what the film is getting at...
Disney Duster wrote:So...I guess you have a good plan. To wait until you get a job and apartment and then see. Since you need to get those quick for not just her but also yourself, maybe you won't be waiting too long after all. So, I wish you the very best in that.
Thanks, I just hope I CAN land those things quickly. I really needed more time than I've got.
Disney Duster wrote:And you know, I can't believe you don't have your first kiss yet. I'm just surprised, and a lot of it is because from that tiny picture I saw of you a long time ago you looked cute and handsome. That usually gets a kiss regardless of love, ya know?

I appreciate that. I guess the stiff competition during my lifetime in regards to male physical fitness and the fact that I am not aggressive in sexual matters (despite a very active libido) may be part of the problem. Though I also am far from trim these days, ha, but as we've discussed in this thread, no, maybe it was the New Year's Resolution thread, I have had weight issues since I was put on steroid asthma medication as a child. For some people, those cause you to put on weight, which causes the teasing from other kids and harassment from adults, which causes a mental complex that screws everything up and usually causes more weight gain. And, the fact seems to be that most people aren't interested in kissing someone who is overweight, especially these days when everyone has a six pack. I can't say I blame them or anything. Morbid obesity isn't exactly a turn-on for me either, ha.
Disney Duster wrote:As for love at first sight - no, the sight part of love does not automatically only mean it is physical attraction. What it can mean is that by seeing someone, sight is simply the method by which you know they are someone you will be in love with. Say you know and love someone for a very long time. As soon as you see them, you know they are the one you've loved for a long time. You don't know it because you are physically attracted, you know it because you can see it is them. And remember, the way Belle could tell the handsome prince was the Beast was because she saw the look in his eyes that he had when he was kind and bearing the lovely soul she fell in love with. That is love at sight. You could see a person drawing something that you also love to draw and you love their drawing, too, and it's one thing you love about them. That would be love by sight.
Hang on. Huh? Okay, at the first part of this, I could simply shake my head, because I don't agree that sight is showing you more than what is visible, and so if you like what you see, well, that's what you're liking. But then you said, "Say you know and love someone for a very long time." If that's the starting point, how are we talking about love at first sight? If you mean like two people who have been writing letters to each other and fell in love that way, that's not the same as love at first sight... That's a cheating sorta love at first sight, ha. When I talk about it, I mean two people who have never met before and know nothing about each other. I think that's what most of us mean when we discuss love at first sight. Not when you somehow already know a lot about the other person but just haven't seen them yet, and that seals the deal. Maybe I'm misunderstanding? With Beauty and the Beast, that's not what happened, by the way. She looked in his eyes and recognized his eyes as the Beast's, that's all. There was no love at first sight in that movie.
Disney Duster wrote:And maybe that's not how love at first sight really happens, I'm just explaining the idea, one that I still like to believe can happen, no matter how magically impossible it sounds. But love can be pretty magical...
Well, ha, I had a bitter college professor once who could really explain to you all the chemical reactions and how that's all the feeling and emotion of love is, but I'll agree to ignore that guy too, even if I don't believe in love at first sight, ha.
Disney Duster wrote:Your assesment of a lot of unhappy couples does sound like it could be true, though, which is sad. When you've been married to someone for how many years, you wouldn't want to believe you are not in true fulfilling love so it would be nice to think that attachment love really is as good as any other love and its who they were meant to be with. Society's and religions rules on marriage may have people say they were in love to the end, but who knows if inside they realize they could have had true love with someone else. And on the subject, who can say what fulfilling love always is. If one love can be truer or better than another, we could always wonder if there's a better match for us out there, couldn't we? I guess it's when you really feel like someone is "the one" that you know that's the love you, and everyone, is supposed to have. When you don't want anyone else (and I don't know if I would make this a requirement, but it should be when you keep not wanting anyone else, after a long time, when you've seen other people, but maybe you do sometimes think you want someone else before you realize you only want the one you've always had).
I do agree that the feeling you should be looking for is that feeling of not wanting anyone else. This is something I feel about the girl I've been dating. However, I don't believe a person has to feel that right away, nor that two people have to discover this feeling at the same time. After she told me to move on, her later e-mails seemed to imply that she wasn't happy without me, and that could be the start of something. It might just stay that way. She might decide she wants me around, but just as a friend, but it could grow into more than that.
Disney Duster wrote:As for your love being with you since you're children, I think I can say it better now. Okay, when you're children, you're not in love. Real romantic love between you would only happen by like high school or perhaps later than that. But I get why even though you wouldn't be in love them, you like the idea of having that time and memories together. But when you find the one...it doesn't matter how much time you spend with them. You WANT to spent all the time in the world you can with them (metaphorically since in reality you will always want and need some time without them, especially alone time), but when you're so in love, every second is so great, you could spend a hundred years together or one day, and it doesn't matter. And don't you like the idea of telling someone about your childhood to get closer?
Telling someone about your childhood is nice, but I think getting more time to spend with them would be better. I think discovering things over time would be better. I think there's something very romantic about sharing your first kiss, and other stuff like that. Yes, I've know people who did that, people who married their childhood sweethearts, and I think that if you are a good match (not all were), then that is about as good as it gets. I don't wish it for me because I never had a childhood sweetheart. The girl I'm in love with, she wouldn't have been born when I was a kid, and I don't want anyone but her. But, I don't agree that "a hundred years together or one day" are just as good. A hundred years with someone you love is definitely better than one day. Let's not get toooo romantic with our ideas so that we end up b.s.ing ourselves, ha.
Disney Duster wrote:And who...who...who gets to experience having their loved ones be people they were with when they were kids? That doesn't happen very often and I really do wonder what that is like because, well, it still sounds weird to me lol.
Well, like I said, I've seen it happen. I think just as far back as adolescence is nice enough, to share all those special kinda things with each other and no one else. That would really be special. And, yeah, I've seen junior high couples who never lost their feelings for each other and got married. Really good matches though. One particular pair comes to mind, because I was quite jealous of that guy, ha.
Disney Duster wrote:Thanks for the advice on what I should do for a job. Maybe I'll minor in art while I major in something else, but I'd like to go for the highest in art I can. You majored in art? I'm sorry about the fine arts thing not working out. I'm surprised you didn't try to refine your talent into that kind of art, Disney artists even draw like that aside from their cartoony designs. I think you should have tried to do that. You still could. You have shown such skills in your Disney Girls piece I think. You know, maybe I could become an illustrator, or a designer for plays, shows, movies. Why wouldn't you want to do that?
[url]
I never really understood the importance of a minor. As in, what you can do with it? (I don't mean it's worthless, just that I literally don't know what they are for) I don't remember exactly what I said, but as I was having a similar conversation with the girl I've been seeing over dinner yesterday, I hope what I told you was the best thing you can get for art in college is the opportunity to hone your skills (the absolutely most helpful part is the use of live models, which she might not get, nude anyway, since it's a catholic university she attends). I don't know if the paper would mean much unless you get the ones to teach it too, which I really should have, but I dabbled in the Masters program, and it was unbearable for me. Yes, I am capable of doing Fine Art, there is a small bit of it in my DeviantArt gallery, but I just don't enjoy it much, and the school I attended expected every such piece you did to have some deeper meaning to it. You had to stand beside it and explain it, and that's what I hated. And I didn't like doing the stuff half the time, either, especially since what they REALLY wanted was abstract stuff, which is something I never could fake convincingly, even if I think most of the real abstract stuff is b.s. also.
Super Aurora is right though. Fine Art is very difficult to make a living on unless you teach. As for me, I never had much interest in fine art as a career though. I was always more illustrative with my work. And even a lot of the work the Disney artists do that you are referring to as fine art is more on the illustrative side and not completely unlike some of the work I have done (but don't show much or do much these days). Illustration was always a better bet for making a career in the past, and frankly, I do consider myself an illustrator, but that, and any area of art (or anything in the arts, really) is really hard to make a living out of or even break into at all. For years, I made nothing on my art. Then, I started pulling in a few hundred a year. Last year, I made like 3 thousand on my illustrating. That's basically all I made last year (I'm wondering how much I'm going to have to pay in taxes for it, and how to do my taxes at all as a freelancer, since I've never had to before). Some people define being a professional as making money off your work, some people say you have to be able to make a living off of it. I figure, factoring in my degree, the state of the economy, and that it's my only income at the moment, I can call myself a professional illustrator, but not a very successful one, ha, and I certainly couldn't live on it independently, which is why I'm desperately looking for any kind of day job right now and wishing I was certified to teach (sort of, I don't really want to teach though). But, at least I have had my work published in actual comics lately (independents, but whatever). It's funny, but my work ended up going the comic book route, even though I think I'm better at the kind of art you would see on covers, and would probably enjoy that more, ha. I used to always want to be a Disney animator. While I still would love to do some work for Disney someday, I don't think I would want to animate for them. I do wish I had animation training, but it wasn't offered where I went to school, and at the time, Disney wanted Fine Art majors (probably the more illustrative kind, too, like myself), but they were firing instead of hiring when I graduated, and now they don't train Fine Artists anymore, they take trained animators fresh outta school, if and when they're hiring anyone, and work 'em like dogs, so I hear, ha. But most of the work IS in computer animation these days. But, really, I don't think I would like doing all those drawings over and over, with only slight changes. But, maybe I'm wrong. What would make ME really happy is if I could ever be my own boss, working from home doing my comic strip and freelancing. But, yeah, that's hard to make a living doing. Some people support themselves purely by putting designs on sites like zazzle though, and tapping into a niche subject that is popular. I wanna keep trying to do that too. Right now I get like 25 or 50 bucks a year from Cafepress and Zazzle, but, admittedly, I don't have a lot of really great stuff posted there yet. I need to do less fan art and more original stuff, ha.
Oh, ha, but what was I talking about? Ah, yeah, so, even illustration, it is hard to get to a point where you make a living on it. Breaking into, say, book illustration, or any other kind, really, it's a big question of HOW it is done. I have never been able to get a good answer from anyone. Most people will tell you it's all in who you know, others simple will say it's very hard. Working on commissions, try to get tips on an artist about where to get them or how? Most will not give any advice, because it's a very competitive thing. It's easy to say, "I'm going to be an illustrator," or whatever else in school (not trying to discourage you here), but when you get out, it can be hard to know how to do it, and probably hard even when you do know. There are so many good artists out there. Just so many, in a world that usually uses photographs these days... I mean, compared to 100 years ago. As for being a designer for plays or shows, as much as I love the theater, I think that's a different kind of art. With movies, well, I love movies and there are probably many jobs for artists, but you have to be in the right place. Most other places, you just have independent film, and independent film usually wants you do work for free, ha. I dabbled in it. I've done some storyboarding just for my credit in something really crappy, or things that end up not getting made at all. I did a ton of work for a werewolf film (storyboarding, ads, creature design) that just ended up getting canceled. Pay was promised from the profits, so that was a real waste of my energy, EXCEPT that at the time, I hadn't drawn for years, so it did get me out of my slump of not drawing since college. That and the introduction someone online gave me to DeviantArt.com. If you don't have a DeviantArt gallery, start one. It keeps your artistic energies up to have an audience that likes your work, ha.