Page 7 of 20
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 7:51 pm
by Rudy Matt
Worst...
Tarzan's Treehouse
Tiki Room: Under New Management
Imagination Pavillion Redo
Mickey Hand on Spaceship Earth
Mickey Hat in front of Chinese Theater
At least one of these was corrected. Here's to the others being fixed ASAP.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:04 pm
by ajmrowland
tarzan's Treehouse is an okay thing, for me. After all, it's not advertised as a ride.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:05 pm
by Rudy Matt
It's an Eisner redress ripoff.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 8:12 pm
by pap64
Rudy Matt wrote:Worst...
Tarzan's Treehouse
Tiki Room: Under New Management
Imagination Pavillion Redo
Mickey Hand on Spaceship Earth
Mickey Hat in front of Chinese Theater
At least one of these was corrected. Here's to the others being fixed ASAP.
Um, I think you are mistaking the concept of rip-off here.
This thread is about products that blatantly rip off or down right steal from Disney (or any other company). What you seem to be talking about are Disney attractions that don't deliver on their promise, hence the term "rip-off" meaning that you lose money on something that you thought was worth it.
So which is it?
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:33 pm
by Siren
Yeah, those aren't technically rip-offs. They are simply new concepts. Afterall, how is Iago and Zazu running the Tiki Room a rip off? Describe that exactly. Its the same show, with Iago and Zazu coming in now and then. Frankly, no different then adding Jack Sparrow, Barbosa, and Davy Jones to POTC ride. Its all done to "modernize" the parks. They are trying to keep up with Universal who isn't afraid to go against the grain and be a bit more adult. Frankly, Disney is doing the same, with having Genie do a Tiger Woods joke, Mad Hatter making a comment about Jerry Springer. Etc.
Disney often does surveys from guests about what they find entertaining. And a majority of guests wanted less 1930s and more 2000s. Its sad, but true. But no way are they rip offs.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:04 pm
by pap64
Siren's right. Disney fans are throwing a fit over how Disney update their rides.
A friend of mine once said that his family got tired of going to Disney because they felt they weren't updating their parks enough and not making them relevant to what is popular today.
Not to mention its been confirmed that guests want to see more of their favorite characters on the parks and rides.
So again, you have to explain why you posted those attractions as rip offs.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:39 pm
by Siren
pap64 wrote:Siren's right.
Nuff said.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:43 pm
by Rudy Matt
Siren wrote:Yeah, those aren't technically rip-offs. They are simply new concepts.
Nope - rip offs. Throwing a new dress on an old ride and calling it a new attraction is a rip off.
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:52 pm
by ajmrowland
When have they really called them new attractions?
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 10:58 pm
by pap64
If I am not mistaken, they were never called new attractions. Updated maybe, but not brand spanking new.
But really, we are going off topic. We know what this thread is really all about. If you want to make a thread about disappointing rip offs at the Disney Theme Parks we have a forum for it.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:16 am
by Super Aurora
Rudy Matt wrote:Worst...
Tarzan's Treehouse
Tiki Room: Under New Management
Imagination Pavillion Redo
Mickey Hand on Spaceship Earth
Mickey Hat in front of Chinese Theater
At least one of these was corrected. Here's to the others being fixed ASAP.
Wrong term of rip-off being discussed here.
You're describing disappointment in theme park attraction idea decision. Hence why you probably felt "rip-off". This thread is talking about outside products that rip off the Disney brand to earn their cheap bucks.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 12:38 am
by Siren
Ahhhh...its so entertaining to watch people who can't admit they are wrong.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:06 am
by Duckburger
Granted it's an older one, but I didn't see it posted before so here we go.
From the wonderful creators of such films as "Ratatoing" and "What's Up: Balloon to the Rescue" ...
TINY ROBOT-S
Here's the dvd cover: (*Warning - May induce headache from banging your head against the wall screaming WHY???*)
Somehow I don't think this needs any argument whether it's a rip-off or cash-in, 'cause it's obviously both.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:47 am
by Heil Donald Duck
There were lots of rippofs in the Golden era of American animation, Both ripped of from Disney and Disney ripping of from others. Almost all Harman and Ising stuff are Disney rippofs and Disney ripped of Paul Terry's Aesope fable series.
But it has always surprised me that this forum is not more interested in the roots of the Disney ie. in the American animated short business.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:48 am
by Heil Donald Duck
Heil Donald Duck wrote:There were lots of rippofs in the Golden era of American animation, Both ripped of from Disney and Disney ripping of from others. Almost all Harman and Ising stuff are Disney rippofs (i.e Bosko the Talking kid and Foxy) and Disney ripped of Paul Terry's Aesope fable series, when he startet the silly Simpony series
But it has always surprised me that this forum is not more interested in the roots of the Disney ie. in the American animated short business.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:46 am
by Rudy Matt
Super Aurora wrote:Rudy Matt wrote:Worst...
Tarzan's Treehouse
Tiki Room: Under New Management
Imagination Pavillion Redo
Mickey Hand on Spaceship Earth
Mickey Hat in front of Chinese Theater
At least one of these was corrected. Here's to the others being fixed ASAP.
Wrong term of rip-off being discussed here.
You're describing disappointment in theme park attraction idea decision. Hence why you probably felt "rip-off". This thread is talking about outside products that rip off the Disney brand to earn their cheap bucks.
Eisner and Katzenberg were "outside" products, who thought changing the sets on Walt's Swiss Family Robinson Treehouse would amount to a new attraction. Cheap, lazy strip-mining of the past, on order with their cheapquels. Rip offs.
Oh yeah - while we're at it - the titles you guys are mocking are no worse than the direct to video horsecrap cheapquels produced under the banner of Disney home video. They are rip offs as well.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 11:35 am
by Super Aurora
Siren wrote:Ahhhh...its so entertaining to watch people who can't admit they are wrong.
Agreed.
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 7:30 pm
by Barbossa
What about this one?
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 8:01 pm
by Margos
Heil Donald Duck wrote:Heil Donald Duck wrote:There were lots of rippofs in the Golden era of American animation, Both ripped of from Disney and Disney ripping of from others. Almost all Harman and Ising stuff are Disney rippofs (i.e Bosko the Talking kid and Foxy) and Disney ripped of Paul Terry's Aesope fable series, when he startet the silly Simpony series
But it has always surprised me that this forum is not more interested in the roots of the Disney ie. in the American animated short business.
This is a little off-topic, but....
Why did you quote yourself right after you said what you quoted?
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 9:31 pm
by pap64
Barbossa wrote:What about this one?
Siren already posted the whole movie a few pages ago for us to enjoy...
I personally think its BETTER than Disney's version... NOT!