Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:44 am
Singerguy, you've hit the nail on the head with every word you've said in this last post,
Thank you.
Thank you.
Disney, DVD, and Beyond Forums
https://dvdizzy.com/forum/
Neal wrote:While I overreacted on my "Save Lumpy for Winnie The Pooh 2011" topic a few months ago, for the most part, I've been a positive poster. I haven't been one of the people ranting about how racist tPatF is. I didn't jump on the bash Mandy Moore bandwagon when Kristin Chenoweth was dropped from Rapunzel. Heck, I even support most of the DTV films.
However, in my short time here, I have found most, if not all, of Duster's posts to be negative. And no, not just negative because I disagree with them. Negative because I find he almost always posts an opinion that he asserts as fact - or the opinion everyone should adopt.
Again, while I did that in my Lumpy topic, for the most part I try to have discussion - not argument in my other topics. Such as in the topic "If the DTVS were actually GOOD would you like them?" I entered that topic liking DTVs fine, framed the topic as if they were not, and then discussed both sides of the topic fairly.
I have (honestly) always been annoyed by Duster's posts long before this, because I always find them one-sided and Duster closed off to discussion. I think I've responded to his posts in the past only to be fought with to the point I just surrender and let him believe his opinion is word.
I hate to sound so rude or mean, but, this is not the first time I've felt Duster has been one-sided and biased in his opinion. I'm sure the people who were applauding Escapay felt the same way, because their applause could not have been without reason.
), it just that his views seems very shoved-in-your-face.
But with The Princess and the Frog, we got an actual teaser a year and a half before the film was released.Poody wrote:I guess we had similar issues here when Princess and the Frog was in the same state...
Do I ever say, "Duster, shut up, your opinion doesn't count" or anything along those lines?Marky wrote:Albert, you are wrong here. Because of the simple fact that you don't let DisneyDuster have his own opinion.
Pot and Kettle, you guys know the drill.Marky wrote:Don't try to silence people if they are just explaining their own opinion
He doesn't understand when someone disagrees with his opinion. He thinks that it means "You can't say your opinion, shut up" rather than "I disagree and here's why". Just look up any of his past posts. If someone says something to the contrary to what he believes in, he's either insulting and saying they don't know what he's talking about (or that they don't know what they themselves are talking about), overtly defensive and whining that he's being silenced, or just disregards it and pretends that their post never existed (such as when 2099net makes lengthy posts explaining the tech behind restorations and he disregards it because it simply proves what he's been saying is wrong).singerguy04 wrote:Marky's just helping stand Duster's ground because he shares his opinion. That doesn't me he doesn't understand, what is there not to understand?
QFT.Super Aurora wrote:He doesn't seems to say "I'm not fond of what the story of Rapunzal seems to be with royalty change etc, but I'll wait and hold my judgement."
His initial respond was more like a declaration of a fact. "Royalty change?! Prince is Bandit?! Automatic FAIL!!! No exceptions."
Trust me, I know this experience WAY too well. I agree with this statement.Escapay wrote: Makes me question why I even bother being a Disney fan sometimes. Fans are sometimes the worst thing to happen to a franchise.
My stars, that shirt has been getting around. I still maintain it would make a great fundraising item, next to our "Hunks of UD Calendar".Escapay wrote:
albert
Signed! I mean personally I probably would have made other choices once I see the final movie, and I regret the fact that Glen Keane is no longer directing. I realise it would be easy for me to condemn and critique this production and voice my frustration, but based on what really. We simply no too little to say anything about the project as a whole. It's only a matter of time before we can truelly dissect and discuss this project frame by frame...enigmawing wrote:The thing I've noticed about most fandoms is that many fans get overly-zealous to the point where they basically think they "own" the material they're fans of. As if they're entitled to be the only ones to decide what makes a good product and what doesn't, instead of backing off and letting the creators do what drew them in in the first place.
As for Disney, I figure . . . no one should be telling them what's suitable for Disney other than themselves.
THIS. Whatever happend to having fun with what you got?enigmawing wrote:The thing I've noticed about most fandoms is that many fans get overly-zealous to the point where they basically think they "own" the material they're fans of. As if they're entitled to be the only ones to decide what makes a good product and what doesn't, instead of backing off and letting the creators do what drew them in in the first place.
As for Disney, I figure . . . no one should be telling them what's suitable for Disney other than themselves.
even though I contributed to it, I agree lolIagoZazu wrote:Here's hoping we get some information on Rapunzel soon before all this drivel contiues for days.
I never understand the complaining on Blu-rays. What is it to argue over to begin with?Flanger-Hanger wrote:Oy, I'm so glad I've been avoiding this thread.
Just think of all the bickering that'll happen when this comes to Blu-ray!