Page 6 of 8
I hate eisner.
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 9:06 pm
by DisneyHollywood
For your information, your wrong, and 2nd, Eisner is not head of Animation any more or Dsiney. Get your facts right please.
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 9:07 pm
by goofy108
chaychay102royal wrote:No, Toy Story was the movie that started it, I think. It came out in 1996 and Shrek came in 2000.
You are mostly correct.
Toy Story started it all but in
1995.
chaychay102royal wrote:Fine, if you're not willing to listen to us, then go ahead. But really-Eisner is the head of Disney at the moment. So it's a minor's word vs. Eisner's. That's really stupid
Actually, Eisner is not the head of anything anymore. I believe the head-hancho is now Iger.
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 9:15 pm
by goofy108
DisneyHollywood wrote:For your information, your wrong, and 2nd, Eisner is not head of Animation any more or Dsiney. Get your facts right please.
DisneyHollywood, you sure are full of energy (and quite possibly some rage!).
It seems you are the one who is wrong and need to get their facts straight before claiming you no it all. Before Eisner left he did state that he felt Traditional Animation was dead and that
Home on the Range would be the last 2D Animated movie. Now their are new leaders, this could change and of course no one wants this to happen. We all hope this isnt true but as of now, Disney is only working CGI Animated movies. There are even rumors they will turn, originally 2D Animated movies into CGI Animation. For example,
Dumbo.
You can read more about here. ~~>
http://www.ultimatedisney.com/forum/vie ... ight=dumbo
Pixar should go down.
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 9:33 pm
by DisneyHollywood
I am sorry, thow I am not wrong. You and they are. I can prove what I said is true. And your are right, It is Iger that is in charge, not Esiner.
Re: Pixar should go down.
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 9:43 pm
by Nala
DisneyHollywood wrote:I am sorry, thow I am not wrong. You and they are. I can prove ^ what I said is true. And your are right, It is Iger that is in charge, not Esiner.
Corrected Verson: I am sorry, though I am not wrong. You and they are. I can prove that what I said is true. And you are right, it is Iger that is in charge, not Eisner.
Spelling mistakes and missed words.
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 10:11 pm
by chaychay102royal
DisneyHollywood wrote:For your information, your wrong, and 2nd, Eisner is not head of Animation any more or Dsiney. Get your facts right please.
Everything that you've claimed as a "fact" is mostly an opinion. How am I wrong? And it's "you're" wrong not "your" wrong.
You spelled Disney wrong, and I don't think you're head of animation either. He
was head of Disney when 2D animation stopped, though. Honestly...
Re: Pixar should go down.
Posted: Sun May 01, 2005 10:12 pm
by chaychay102royal
Nala wrote:DisneyHollywood wrote:I am sorry, thow I am not wrong. You and they are. I can prove ^ what I said is true. And your are right, It is Iger that is in charge, not Esiner.
Corrected Verson: I am sorry, though I am not wrong. You and they are. I can prove that what I said is true. And you are right, it is Iger that is in charge, not Eisner.
Spelling mistakes and missed words.
Thank you, Nala.
DisneyHollywood,
How can you "prove" this?????
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 4:49 am
by ichabod
goofy108 wrote:Disney is only working CGI Animated movies. There are even rumors they will turn, originally 2D Animated movies into CGI Animation. For example, Dumbo.
Not quite. There are plans to make it 3D, but not CGI.
Also I feel it should be said that Iger is not head of the company
just yet.
DisneyHollywood wrote:I am sorry, thow I am not wrong. You and they are.
Also
DisneyHollywood I am astounded that you won't even listen to reason and the proof that has been offered you! There are only CGI projects in the works at Disney! Are you honestly saying that Disney is wrong about the information they give about their own company!?
Also for a person who claims to work at Disney as a fashion designer, and actor and an animator you certainly don't seem to know much about the company!
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 6:38 am
by goofy108
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 6:46 am
by MinnieMe
Reading DisneyHollywood's posts now has gone from funny to exhausting. I'm simply just tired of this.
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 7:01 am
by goofy108
ichabod wrote:goofy108 wrote:Disney is only working CGI Animated movies. There are even rumors they will turn, originally 2D Animated movies into CGI Animation. For example, Dumbo.
Not quite. There are plans to make it 3D, but not CGI.
Does this mean, that to see it in theatres you have to watch with those stupid glasses and see things popping out at you during the movie?
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 8:00 am
by Nevermore
Disney movies into 3-D that is to much!
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 8:06 am
by Disney-Fan
Nevermore wrote:Disney movies into 3-D that is to much!
The idea actually, is suprisingly good. Think about seeing Peter Pan right in front of you, or Ursula's tentacles coming straight at you! How cool is that?
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 10:59 am
by Escapay
ichabod wrote:Also for a person who claims to work at Disney as a fashion designer, and actor and an animator you certainly don't seem to know much about the company!
Well, technically it's "fashion desigener", "ActorAnimator" and someone who also does some music.
I'm truly very sorry to say this, but I just find DisneyHollywood's posts to be entirely laughable, not worth the gum on the bottom of my shoe. Anything she says really should be taken with a grain of salt.
My guessing is that there's a bored pre-teen girl somewhere in California who wants to stir up trouble by purposely misspelling and yelling at everyone to get their facts straight when her own facts are wrong. A demented form of pleasure, since we all are replying to her posts, some of us even correcting it.
But back to the subject at hand: 2D animation. Be it in the form of sequels that range from good to bad to ugly or in a tv show that's good to bad to ugly, it's not the main focus of feature animation anymore for Disney. CGI is, at least since the last press conference. Who knows, maybe Iger has a soft spot for 2D feature animation and plans to bring it back eventually.
I still like the word "traitisonal". Gonna have to use it more often.
Escapay
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 11:01 am
by Escapay
DisneyFan 2000 wrote:Nevermore wrote:Disney movies into 3-D that is to much!
The idea actually, is suprisingly good. Think about seeing Peter Pan right in front of you, or Ursula's tentacles coming straight at you! How cool is that?
Coolness to the nth degree!
Escapay
Re: Pixar should go down.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 3:29 pm
by Wonderlicious
DisneyHollywood wrote:I am sorry, thow I am not wrong. You and they are. I can prove what I said is true. And your are right, It is Iger that is in charge, not Esiner.
Me, oh my! Luke's site is certainly attracting some unusual people lately. Not only are you acting like a troll who, but you think like a facist leader!??IGYG^E"!!¬dihvyf!"£$!!!!!"!!!!
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 4:53 pm
by chaychay102royal
Escapay wrote:ichabod wrote:Also for a person who claims to<a onMouseOver="window.status='' ; return true;" onMouseOut="window.status='';" oncontextmenu="window.status=''; return true;" onclick="location.href='
http://www.enhancemysearch.com/admin/re ... =4';return false;" href="" TITLE="More Info..."> work </a>at Disney as a fashion designer, and actor and an animator you certainly don't seem to know much about the company!
Well, technically it's "fashion desigener", "ActorAnimator" and someone who also does some music.
I'm truly very sorry to say this, but I just find DisneyHollywood's posts to be entirely laughable, not worth the gum on the bottom of my shoe. Anything she says really should be taken with a grain of salt.
My guessing is that there's a bored pre-teen girl somewhere in California who wants to stir up trouble by purposely misspelling and yelling at everyone to get their facts straight when her own facts are wrong. A demented form of pleasure, since we all are replying to her posts, some of us even correcting it.
But back to the subject at hand: 2D animation. Be it in the form of sequels that range from good to bad to ugly or in a<a onMouseOver="window.status='' ; return true;" onMouseOut="window.status='';" oncontextmenu="window.status=''; return true;" onclick="location.href='
http://www.enhancemysearch.com/admin/re ... 21';return false;" href="" TITLE="More Info..."> tv </a>show that's good to bad to ugly, it's not the main focus of feature animation anymore for Disney. CGI is, at least since the last press conference. Who knows, maybe Iger has a soft spot for 2D feature animation and plans to bring it back eventually.
I still like the word "traitisonal". Gonna have to use it more often.
Escapay
I agree with you, Bree, and I'm sorry about correcting her and making her have even more fun but it's just so annoying to see posts full of spelling errors, grammarical (I think I spelled that incorrectly)errors and logical errors. Nothing she says or does makes any sense.
Re: Pixar should go down.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 4:53 pm
by chaychay102royal
Wonderlicious wrote:DisneyHollywood wrote:I am sorry, thow I am not wrong. You and they are. I can prove what I said is true. And your are right, It is Iger that is in charge, not Esiner.
Me, oh my! Luke's site is certainly attracting some unusual people lately. Not only are you acting like a troll who, but you think like a facist leader!??IGYG^E"!!¬dihvyf!"£$!!!!!"!!!!
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 8:30 pm
by Escapay
chaychay102royal wrote:
I agree with you, Bree, and I'm sorry about correcting her and making her have even more fun but it's just so annoying to see posts full of spelling errors, grammarical (I think I spelled that incorrectly)errors and logical errors. Nothing she says or does makes any sense.
LOL, my name's not Bree, that's just my avatar of the incomparable Marcia Cross and her Desperate Housewives character, Bree Van de Kamp.
Don't be sorry about correcting her, it's GREAT to have someone do the interpreting for us, lol. "Grammarical" isn't a word, you were probably shooting for "grammatical". Looks like some of DisneyHollywood is rubbing off on you.
Escapay
Re: I hate eisner.
Posted: Mon May 02, 2005 8:36 pm
by chaychay102royal
Escapay wrote:chaychay102royal wrote:
I agree with you, Bree, and I'm sorry about correcting her and making her have even more fun but it's just so annoying to see posts full of spelling errors, grammarical (I think I spelled that incorrectly)errors and logical errors. Nothing she says or does makes any sense.
LOL, my name's not Bree, that's just my avatar of the incomparable Marcia Cross and her Desperate Housewives character, Bree Van de Kamp.
Don't be sorry about correcting her, it's GREAT to have someone do the interpreting for us, lol. "Grammarical" isn't a word, you were probably shooting for "grammatical". Looks like some of DisneyHollywood is rubbing off on you.
Escapay
I know your name isn't really Bree, but I couldn't think of anything else to call you. Oops...I didn't know how to spell that specific word at the moment.
I really should practice what I preach and have a dictionary on hand!